Advertisement

Soil Modifiers (Ca-Zeolite and Gypsum) as Ecosystem Engineers in Soils of Humid and Semi-arid Tropical Climates

  • D. K. Pal
Chapter

Abstract

The presence of soil modifiers such as Ca-zeolites and gypsum in Indian tropical soils was reported few decades back by the researchers of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (ICAR-NBSS&LUP), Nagpur, to highlight their unique roles in fine-tuning the exiting soil classification scheme and also the management practices to enhance and sustain the soils’ productivity. But their specific role in ecosystem services as both sustained and temporary ecosystem engineers remained to be evaluated. Both Ca-zeolite and gypsum release Ca2+ ions, which make soils fairly saturated with Ca ions. A hypothesis on the unique role of Ca-zeolites (heulandite) was proposed in the early 1990s on the formation and persistence of several million years old acidic ferruginous Inceptisols, Vertisols, Alfisols and Mollisols in intense leaching environment of humid tropical (HT) climate on the Deccan basalt rock system in Pune district of the north-western part of the Western Ghats in the state of Maharashtra and in Mandla district of the Satpura ranges in the state of Madhya Pradesh. The formation and persistence of these million years old acid soils then led soil researchers to hypothesize that the favourable release of Ca ions from heulandite prevented the progressive pedogenesis towards the formation of Ultisols and also prevented the soils from losing their productivity. This may suggest that Ca- zeolites as prolonged ecosystem engineers would also support a sustained ecosystem services to agriculture, horticulture and forestry enterprises in similar soils under HT climate in other districts of the Western Ghats (WG) and the Konkan Region (KR) representing the Deccan basalt geology. Validation of this hypothesis was made on similar soils of Satara and Kolhapur districts of the WG and the Ratnagiri districts of the KR areas, and it was observed that the soils developed on the Deccan basalt support agriculture, forestry and mango crop as natural vegetation and also as cultivated system in the vast area of the WG and KR regions. Irrespective of their physiographic regions, ferruginous soils of both the WG and KR show highly comparable physical, chemical and mineralogical characters, which indicate that the rate of soil weathering remained almost similar under the dominating effect of HT climate prevailing for the last several million years. The acid ferruginous soils of the Satara and Kolhapur districts of the WG and the Ratnagiri districts of the KR areas are also endowed with Ca-rich zeolites (heulandite) derived from the Deccan basalt similar to those of the Pune district of the WG. Constant slow release of Ca2+ ions from heulandite prevented the total transformation of the smectite (the first weathering product of the basalt) to pure kaolinite even under intense weathering environment of the HT climate. Instead of phasing towards the formation of kaolinitic/gibbsitic Ultisols/Oxisols, soil formation yielded acidic but organic carbon (OC)-rich Inceptisols and Alfisols and also Mollisols with abundant kaolin, which is an interstratified mineral consisting of 0.7 mineral with hydroxy-interlayered smectite (Sm/K). In semi-arid tropical (SAT) environment, Ca-zeolites exhibit their ecosystem services by creating a favourable drainage even amidst sodicity in Vertisols. They help in redefining sodic soils and support good agricultural practices by retaining NH4+ions in their crystal structure and releasing K ions into soil solution and by not fixing solution P. But in some Vertisols, even Ca-zeolites are unable to arrest the adverse effect of regressive pedogenesis because Ca-zeolites behaved as transitory ecosystem engineers, and thus the soils turned out to be sodic in the SAT environment. On the contrary, gypsum as a soil modifier could arrest the development of sodicity in SAT Vertisols by providing enough soluble Ca ions which helped to overcome the ill effects of regressive pedogenesis and also transformed the soils into a vibrant and productive agricultural system. The present sustainability of crop productivity in SAT Vertisols would however be further improved by using good-quality irrigation water as gypsum has been available for the last several thousands of years as a better ecosystem engineer than Ca-zeolites.

Keywords

Soils of semi-arid and humid tropical climates Soil modifiers Soils’ ecosystem engineers Prolonged and transitory ecosystem engineers 

References

  1. Ahmad N (1996) Occurrence and distribution of Vertisols. In: Ahmad N, Mermut A (eds) Vertisols and technologies for their management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  2. Almeida EV, Fernandes FM, Prado RM, Bolianil AC, Corrêa LS (2012) Mango tree response to lime applied during the production phase. Open J Soil Sci 2:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhatia A, Pathak H, Aggarwal P (2004) Inventory of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils of India and their global warming potential. Curr Sci 87:317–324Google Scholar
  4. Bhatia A, Aggarwal PK, Jain N, Pathak H (2012) Greenhouse gas emission from rice-wheat growing areas in India: spatial analysis and upscaling. Greenhouse Gases Sci Technol 2:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Deshpande SB (1993) Genesis and transformation of minerals in the formation of red (Alfisols) and black (Inceptisols and Vertisols) soils on Deccan Basalt in the Western Ghats, India. J Soil Sci 44:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Srivastava P (1999) Role of zeolites in persistence of high altitude ferruginous Alfisols of the humid tropical Western Ghats, India. Geoderma 90:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Chandran P, Ray SK (2005) Land-use, clay mineral type and organic carbon content in two Mollisols-Alfisols-Vertisols catenary-sequences of tropical India. Clay Res 24:105–122Google Scholar
  8. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Lal S, Chandran P, Ray SK (2006) Formation and persistence of Mollisols on zeolitic Deccan basalt of humid tropical India. Geoderma 146:609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Pal DK, Mandal C, Mandal DK (2015a) Distribution of zeolitic soils in India. Curr Sci 109:1305–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharyya T, Chandran, P, Ray SK, Mandal C, Tiwary P, Pal DK, Maurya UK, Nimkar AM, Kuchankar H, Sheikh S, Telpande BA, Kolhe A (2015b) Walkley-Black recovery factor to reassess soil organic matter: Indo-Gangetic plains and black soil region of India case studies. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46:2628–2648. ISSN: 0010-3624 print/1532–2416 online/.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1089265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown G, Catt JA, Weir AH (1969) Zeolites of the clinoptilolite-heulandite type in sediments of south-east England. Miner Mag 37:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandran P, Ray SK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Krishnan P, Pal DK (2005) Lateritic soils of Kerala, India: their mineralogy, genesis and taxonomy. Aust J Soil Res 43:839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesworth W (1973) The parent rock effect in the genesis of soil. Geoderma 10:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chesworth W (1980) The haplosoil system. Am J Sci 280:969–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El Abedine AZ, Robinson GH, Tyego V (1969) A study of certain physical properties of a Vertisol in a Gezira area, Republic of Sudan. Soil Sci 108:358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ICAR-NAAS (Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) (2010) Degraded and waste lands of India-status and spatial distribution. Published by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Idnurm M, Schmidt PW (1986) Paleo-magnetic dating of weathered profile. Geol Survey India Mem 120:79–88Google Scholar
  18. Joshi NS, Vaidya KP, Pawar CD (2015) Assessment of physico-chemical properties in soil from mango orchards of Ratnagiri district. Int J Agric Sci Res 5:131–136Google Scholar
  19. Joshi NS, Prabhudesai SS, Burondkar MM, Gokhale NB, Pujari KH, Dhekale JS (2016) Stage-wise nutrient status of leaf and soil of Alphonso mango grown in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra, India. Indian J Agric Res 50:318–324Google Scholar
  20. Kadrekar SB (1979) Utility of basic slag and liming material in lateritic soils of Konkan. Indian J Agron 25:102–104Google Scholar
  21. Kadu PR, Vaidya PH, Balpande SS, Satyavathi PLA, Pal DK (2003) Use of hydraulic conductivity to evaluate the suitability of Vertisols for deep rooted crops in semi-arid parts of Central India. Soil Use Manag 19:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lal S (2000) Characteristics, genesis and use potential of soils of the Western Ghats, Maharashtra. PhD thesis. Dr. PDKV. Akola, Maharashtra, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Ming DW, Allen ER (2001) Use of natural zeolites in agronomy, horticulture and environmental soil remediation. Rev Mineral Geochem 45:619–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pal DK (2013) Soil modifiers: their advantages and challenges. Clay Res 32:91–101Google Scholar
  25. Pal DK (2017) A treatise of Indian and tropical soils. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pal DK, Deshpande SB (1987) Characteristics and genesis of minerals in some benchmark Vertisols of India. Pedologie (Ghent) 37:259–275Google Scholar
  27. Pal DK, Durge SL (1987) Potassium release and fixation reactions in some benchmark Vertisols of India in relation to their mineralogy. Pedologie (Ghent) 37:103–116Google Scholar
  28. Pal DK, Dasog GS, Vadivelu S, Ahuja RL, Bhattacharyya T (2000a) Secondary calcium carbonate in soils of arid and semi-arid regions of India. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 149–185Google Scholar
  29. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Deshpande SB, Sarma VAK, Velayutham M (2000b) Significance of minerals in soil environment of India. NBSS Review Series 1. NBSS&LUP, Nagpur, 68 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Pal DK, Srivastava P, Durge SL, Bhattacharyya T (2001) Role of weathering of fine grained micas in potassium management of Indian soils. Appl Clay Sci 20:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Ray SK, Bhuse SR (2003a) Developing a model on the formation and resilience of naturally degraded black soils of the Peninsular India as a decision support system for better land use planning. NRDMS, DST project report, NBSSLUP (ICAR), Nagpur, 144pGoogle Scholar
  32. Pal DK, Srivastava P, Bhattacharyya T (2003b) Clay illuviation in calcareous soils of the semi-arid part of the Indo-Gangetic plains, India. Geoderma 115:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Ray SK, Chandran P, Srivastava P, Durge SL, Bhuse SR (2006) Significance of soil modifiers (Ca-zeolites and gypsum) in naturally degraded Vertisols of the Peninsular India in redefining the sodic soils. Geoderma 136:210–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pal DK, Mandal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Mandal C, Sarkar D (2009a) Revisiting the agro-ecological zones for crop evaluation. Indian J Genet 69:315–318Google Scholar
  35. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009b) Tectonics-climate-linked natural soil degradation and its impact in rainfed agriculture: Indian experience. In: Wani SP, Rockström J, Oweis T (eds) Rainfed agriculture: unlocking the potential. CABI International, Oxfordshire, pp 54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK, Satyavathi PLA, Durge SL, Raja P, Maurya UK (2009c) Vertisols (cracking clay soils) in a climosequence of Peninsular India: evidence for Holocene climate changes. Quat Int 209:6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Wani SP (2012a) Formation and management of cracking clay soils (Vertisols) to enhance crop productivity: Indian experience. In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds) World soil resources and food security. CRC Press/Francis and Taylor, Boca Raton, pp 317–343Google Scholar
  38. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2012b) Vertisols of tropical Indian environments: pedology and edaphology. Geoderma 189-190:28–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2013a) Zeolitic soils of the Deccan basalt areas in India: their pedology and edaphology. Curr Sci 105:309–318Google Scholar
  40. Pal DK, Sarkar D, Bhattacharyya T, Datta SC, Chandran P, Ray SK (2013b) Impact of climate change in soils of semi-arid tropics (SAT). In: Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Wani SP (eds) Climate change and agriculture. Studium Press, New Delhi, pp 113–121Google Scholar
  41. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL, Srivastava P (2014) Red ferruginous soils of tropical Indian environments: a review of the pedogenic processes and its implications for edaphology. Catena 121:260–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Lal S (2018) Sustained mango cultivation in the ferruginous soils of Konkan and the Western Ghats: soil acidity and pedological enigma. In: Abstracted in International mango conference, 2018 May 8–10, Vengurle, Near Goa, India. ISASaT. Abstract No. PNRM-P-15Google Scholar
  43. Puranik UY, Prabhudesai SS, Dhopavkar RV, Zodge SD, Kapse VD (2016) Physico-chemical properties of soil in Alphonso mango orchards from Ratnagiri and Devgad in relation to yield. Adv Life Sci 15:5071–5073Google Scholar
  44. Puranik UY, Bhosale AR, Kapse VD, Zodge SD, Prabhudesai SS (2017) Secondary nutrient status in soil and leaf of alphonso mango orchards from Ratnagiri and Devgad in relation to yield. Int J Chem Stud 5:43–46Google Scholar
  45. Robinson GH (1971) Exchangeable sodium and yields of cotton on certain clay soils of Sudan. J Soil Sci 22:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saadat MN, Gupta K (2016) Impact of soil on the productivity of mango crop in Malda district, West Bengal. Am Int J Res Humanit Arts Soc Sci 14:121–126Google Scholar
  47. Sahrawat KL (1995) Fixed ammonium and carbon-nitrogen ratios of some semi-arid tropical Indian soils. Geoderma 68:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sahrawat KL, Warren GP (1989) Sorption of labeled phosphate by a Vertisol and an Alfisol of the semi-arid zone of India. Fertil Res 20:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sahrawat KL, Bhattacharyya T, Wani SP, Chandran P, Ray SK, Pal DK, Padmaja KV (2005) Long-term lowland rice and arable cropping effects on carbon and nitrogen status of some semi-arid tropical soils. Curr Sci 89:2159–2163Google Scholar
  50. Sehgal JL (1998) Red and lateritic soils: an overview. In: Sehgal J, Blum WE, Gajbhiye KS (eds) Red and lateritic soils. Managing red and lateritic soils for sustainable agriculture 1. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, pp 3–10Google Scholar
  51. Soil Survey Staff (1994) Keys to soil taxonomy, sixth ed. SMSS Technical Monograph no. 19. SMSS, Blacksburg, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  52. Talibudeen O, Weir AH (1972) Potassium reserves in a ‘Harwell’ series soil. J Soil Sci 23:456–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomar SS, Tembe GP, Sharma SK, Tomar VS (1996) Studies on some land management practices for increasing agricultural production in Vertisols of central India. Agric Water Manag 30:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Truc MT, Yoshida M (2011) Effect of zeolite on the decomposition resistance of organic matter in tropical soils under global warming. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 59:1664–1668Google Scholar
  55. Warren GP, Sahrawat KL (1993) Assessment of fertilizer P residues in a calcareous Vertisol. Fertil Res 34:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zade SP, Chandran P, Pal DK (2017a) Ca-zeolites as transitory eco-system engineers: hydro-pedological evidence in cracking clay soils (Vertisols) of semi-arid Marathwada region, Maharashtra. Clay Res 36:90–105Google Scholar
  57. Zade SP, Chandran P, Pal DK (2017b) Role of calcium carbonate and palygorskite in enhancing exchangeable magnesium to impair drainage of Vertisols of semi-arid western India. Clay Res 36:33–45Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Pal
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Soil Resource StudiesICAR-NBSS&LUPNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations