Advertisement

Gameful Design Heuristics: A Gamification Inspection Tool

  • Gustavo F. TondelloEmail author
  • Dennis L. Kappen
  • Marim Ganaba
  • Lennart E. Nacke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11566)

Abstract

Despite the emergence of many gameful design methodologies in the literature, there is a lack of methods to evaluate the resulting designs. Gameful design techniques aim to increase the user’s motivation to interact with a software, but there are presently no accepted guidelines on how to find out if this goal was achieved during the design phase of a project. This paper presents the Gameful Design Heuristics, a novel set of guidelines that facilitate a heuristic evaluation of gameful software, with a focus on the software’s potential to afford intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for the user. First, we reviewed several gameful design methods to identify the most frequently employed dimensions of motivational affordances. Then, we devised a set of 28 gamification heuristics that can be used to rapidly evaluate a gameful system. Finally, we conducted a summative empirical evaluation study with five user experience professionals, which demonstrated that our heuristics can help the evaluators find more motivational issues in interactive systems than they would without the heuristics. The suggested method fulfills the need for evaluation tools specific to gameful design, which could help evaluators assess the potential user experience of a gameful application in the early phases of a project.

Keywords

Gameful design heuristics Heuristic evaluation User experience Gamification Gameful design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants, who generously offered their time to help us. This work was supported by CNPq, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – Brazil; SSHRC, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council – Canada [895-2011-1014, IMMERSe]; NSERC, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-418622-2012]; CFI, the Canada Foundation for Innovation [35819]; and Mitacs [IT07255].

References

  1. 1.
    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.E.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “Gamification.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, Tampere, Finland, pp. 9–15. ACM (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
  2. 2.
    Smith, S.L., Mosier, J.N.: Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software. Mitre Corporation, Bedford (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nielsen, J.: Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems - CHI 1992, pp. 373–380 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142834
  4. 4.
    Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods, pp. 25–62. Wiley, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3025–3034 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2014.377
  6. 6.
    White, G.R., Mirza-Babaei, P., McAllister, G., Good, J.: Weak inter-rater reliability in heuristic evaluation of video games. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2011, pp. 1441–1446. ACM (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979788
  7. 7.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: a self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emot. 30, 347–363 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum, New York and London (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deterding, S.: The lens of intrinsic skill atoms: a method for gameful design. Hum. Comput. Interact. 30, 294–335 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.993471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mora, A., Riera, D., González, C., Arnedo-Moreno, J.: Gamification: a systematic review of design frameworks. J. Comput. High. Educ. 29(3), 516–548 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9150-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deterding, S.: Situated motivational affordances of game elements: a conceptual model. In: Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts, a Workshop at CHI 2011. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, P.: Motivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use. Commun. ACM 51, 145–147 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1400214.1400244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 1994, pp. 152–158 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729
  16. 16.
    Lucero, A., Holopainen, J., Ollila, E., Suomela, R., Karapanos, E.: The playful experiences (PLEX) framework as a guide for expert evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI 2013, pp. 221–230. ACM (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2513506.2513530
  17. 17.
    Lucero, A., Karapanos, E., Arrasvuori, J., Korhonen, H.: Playful or gameful? Creating delightful user experiences. Interactions 21, 34–39 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2590973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chou, Y.: Actionable Gamification - Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards. Octalysis Media (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tondello, G.F., Wehbe, R.R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., Nacke, L.E.: The gamification user types hexad scale. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY 2016, Austin, TX, USA , pp. 229–243. ACM (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082
  20. 20.
    Morschheuser, B., Werder, K., Hamari, J., Abe, J.: How to gamify? A method for designing gamification. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA. IEEE (2017).  https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.155
  21. 21.
    Hamari, J., Huotari, K., Tolvanen, J.: Gamification and economics. In: Walz, S.P., Deterding, S. (eds.) The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications, pp. 139–161. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deci, E.L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B.C., Leone, D.R.: Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. J. Pers. 62, 119–142 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huta, V., Waterman, A.S.: Eudaimonia and its distinction from Hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. J. Happiness Stud. 15, 1425–1456 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peterson, C., Park, N., Seligman, M.E.P.: Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life. J. Happiness Stud. 6, 25–41 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rigby, S., Ryan, R.M.: Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us In and Hold Us Spellbound. Praeger, Santa Barbara (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malone, T.W.: Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction. Cogn. Sci. 4, 333–369 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tondello, G.F., Kappen, D.L., Mekler, E.D., Ganaba, M., Nacke, L.E.: Heuristic evaluation for gameful design. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts - CHI PLAY EA 2016, pp. 315–323. ACM (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2968120.2987729
  28. 28.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems - CHI 1990, pp. 249–256 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
  29. 29.
    Nielsen, J., Landauer, T.K.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 1993, pp. 206–213. ACM (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169166
  30. 30.
    Seaborn, K., Fels, D.I.: Gamification in theory and action: a survey. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 74, 14–31 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, J.A.: Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1509–1512 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986102
  32. 32.
    Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C.: Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration. In: Ozok, A.A., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) OCSC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5621, pp. 557–566. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C.: User experience design for inexperienced gamers: GAP – Game Approachability Principles. In: Bernhaupt, R. (ed.) Evaluating User Experience in Games, pp. 131–148. Springer, London (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Korhonen, H., Koivisto, E.M.I.: Playability heuristics for mobile multi-player games. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, pp. 28–35 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1306813.1306828
  35. 35.
    Pinelle, D., Wong, N., Stach, T., Gutwin, C.: Usability heuristics for networked multiplayer games. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 169–178 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531700
  36. 36.
    Paavilainen, J.: Critical review on video game evaluation heuristics: social games perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, pp. 56–65 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920787
  37. 37.
    Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sweetser, P., Johnson, D., Wyeth, P.: Revisiting the GameFlow model with detailed heuristics. J. Creat. Technol. 3 (2013). https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/journal-of-creative-technologies/index.php/JCT/article/view/16
  39. 39.
    Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Francisco-Aparicio, A., Gutiérrez-Vela, F.L., Isla-Montes, J.L., Sanchez, J.L.G.: Gamification: analysis and application. In: Penichet, V., Peñalver, A., Gallud, J. (eds.) New Trends in Interaction, Virtual Reality and Modeling, pp. 113–126. Springer, London (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5445-7_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jiménez, S.: Gamification Model Canvas. http://www.gameonlab.com/canvas/
  42. 42.
    Burke, B.: Gamify: How Gamification Motivates People to Do Extraordinary Things. Bibliomotion, Brookline (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kappen, D.L., Nacke, L.E.: The kaleidoscope of effective gamification: deconstructing gamification in business applications. In: Proceedings of Gamification 2013, Stratford, ON, Canada, pp. 119–122. ACM (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583029
  44. 44.
    Paharia, R.: Loyalty 3.0: How to Revolutionize Customer and Employee Engagement with Big Data and Gamification. McGraw-Hill, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nicholson, S.: A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L.C. (eds.) Gamification in Education and Business, pp. 1–20. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Werbach, K., Hunter, D.: For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Press, Philadelphia (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    McGonigal, J.: SuperBetter: A Revolutionary Approach to Getting Stronger, Happier, Braver and More Resilient. Penguin Books, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, pp. 1–4 (2004)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lazzaro, N.: The four fun keys. In: Isbister, K., Schaffer, N. (eds.) Game Usability: Advancing the Player Experience, pp. 315–344. Elsevier, Burlington (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HCI Games Group, Games InstituteUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Cheriton School of Computer ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Department of Communication ArtsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  4. 4.Stratford School of Interaction and BusinessUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  5. 5.Humber CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations