Advertisement

US Print Culture, Literary Narrative, and Slow Reading in the Age of Big Data: Steve Tomasula’s VAS: An Opera in Flatland

  • Antje Kley
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Book History book series (NDBH)

Abstract

Antje Kley considers how contemporary fiction in the medium of the printed book may offer its readers a critical perspective on the politics of statistical data acquisition, specifically in the domains of personal quantification and self-optimization. She reads Steve Tomasula’s formal experiments with typeface, page layout, and other elements of book design in his multimodal novel VAS as a literary intervention into a culture whose decision-making processes increasingly rely on probabilistic predictions based on statistical data analytics rather than on ethical deliberation. Kley locates the subversive potential of literature in its ability to subjectify and sensorially refract knowledge production and communication, offering its readers conceptual alternatives to the detached abstracting perspective often privileged in scientific knowledge cultures, here represented by biomedicine.

Bibliography

  1. Bouk, Dan. 2015. How Our Days Became Numbered: Risk and the Rise of the Statistical Individual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2016. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Cukier, Kenneth, and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  5. Danter, Stefan, Ulfried Reichardt, and Regina Schober. 2016. Theorizing the Quantified Self and Posthumanist Agency: Self-Knowledge and Posthumanist Agency in Contemporary US-American Literature. In Quantified Selves and Statistical Bodies, ed. Pablo Abend and Mathias Fuchs. Special Issue, Digital Culture and Society 2 (1): 53–67.Google Scholar
  6. Daston, Lorraine. 1992. Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective. Social Studies of Science 22 (4): 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2008. On Scientific Observation. Isis 99 (1): 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duttweiler, Stefanie, Robert Gugutzer, Jan-Hendrik Passoth, and Jörg Strübing, eds. 2016. Leben nach Zahlen: Self-Tracking als Optimierungsprojekt? Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  9. Felski, Rita. 2008. Uses of Literature. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbons, Alison. 2012. Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kley, Antje. 2009. Ethik medialer Repräsentation im englischen und US-amerikanischen Roman, 1743–2000. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2016. Literary Knowledge Production and the Natural Sciences in the US. In Knowledge Landscapes North America, ed. Simone Knewitz, Christian Klöckner, and Sabine Sielke, 153–177. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
  13. Kley, Antje, and Karin Hoepker. 2017. Beyond the Laboratory: Biotechnology and Literary Knowledge Production in Contemporary Science Novels. In Literary Knowledge Production and the Life Sciences, ed. Karin Hoepker and Heike Schaefer. Special Issue, LWU. Literatur in Wissenschaft und Unterricht 48 (3): 195–212.Google Scholar
  14. Livingstone, David. 2003. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lombardo, Paul A., ed. 2011. A Century of Eugenics: From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, Ronald E. 1991. American Literature and the Destruction of Knowledge: Innovative Writing in the Age of Epistemology. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  19. O’Reilly Media. 2012. Big Data Now. 2nd ed. O’Reilly Media. Sebastopol, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Pernick, Martin S. 1996. The Black Stork. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schaefer, Heike. 2019. American Literature and Immediacy: Literary Innovation and the Emergence of Photography, Film, and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schmidt, S.J. 1998. Modernisierung, Kontingenz, Medien: Hybride Beobachtungen. In Medien – Welten – Wirklichkeiten, ed. Gianni Vattimo and Wolfgang Welsch, 173–186. München: Fink.Google Scholar
  23. Starre, Alexander. 2015. Metamedia: American Book Fictions and Literary Print Culture After Digitization. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Striphas, Ted. 2009. The Late Age of Print: Everyday Book Culture from Consumerism to Control. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Terdiman, Richard. 1985. Discourse/Counter-Discourse: The Theory and Practice of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tomasula, Steve. 2004. VAS: An Opera in Flatland. Illustrated by Stephen Farrell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antje Kley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of English and American StudiesUniversity of Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations