Advertisement

The Development of Green Finance by Sector

  • Olaf WeberEmail author
  • Amr ElAlfy
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance book series (SIF)

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the development of green finance by sector. To this extent, it first examines the role of multilateral development banks in launching and fostering green finance and sustainable finance. Hence, it assesses the approaches adopted by industrial companies to embrace sustainable finance, in particular as concerns the implementation of sustainability and environmental reporting. Finally, it deals with the greening of private financial institutions (in particular, banks), underlying their crucial role in facilitating the development of green finance.

References

  1. 3M. (2014, July 1). Environment, health, and safety standard. Retrieved from: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/731894O/waste-management-program-standard.pdf?&fn=WasteMgmntProgramStandard.pdf
  2. 3M. (2017). 2016 Sustainability report. Retrieved from: http://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/sustainability-report/global-challenges/raw-materials/
  3. African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank, Inter-American Development Bank Group, Islamic Development Bank, and World Bank Group. (2018). Joint report on multilateral development banks’ climate finance. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
  4. Bangladesh Bank. (2011). Environmental risk management (ERM) guidelines for banks and financial institutions in Bangladesh. Retrieved from Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya, A., Oppenheim, J., & Stern, N. (2015). Driving sustainable development through better infrastructure: Key elements of a transformation program. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon – Climate change and financial stability. London: Bank of England.Google Scholar
  9. China Banking Regulatory Commission. (2012). Notice of the China banking regulatory commission CBRC on issuing the green credit guidelines. Beijing: China Banking Regulatory Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Chowdhury, R. K. (2018). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Bangladeshi banks. Waterloo: University of Waterloo. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/14208.Google Scholar
  11. Clapp, J. (1998). The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Global Governance, 4(3), 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cui, Y., Geobey, S., Weber, O., & Lin, H. (2018). The impact of green lending on credit risk in China. Sustainability, 10(6), 2008.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis-Walling, P., & Batterman, S. A. (1997). Environmental reporting by the fortune 50 firms. Environmental Management, 21(6), 865–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dupont-Enzer, M. (2014, April 2). Why is South Africa leading the integrated reporting debate? Retrieved from: http://publisher.enablon.com/blog/why-is-south-africa-leading-the-integrated-reporting-debate/
  15. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
  16. EU High Level Expert Group in Sustainable Finance. (2018). Financing a sustainable European economy. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  17. Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149–178.Google Scholar
  18. Fifka, M. (2012). The development and state of research on social and environmental reporting in global comparison. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 62(1), 45–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ghio, N. (2015, April 21). New report once again shows danger of MDB financing for large fossil fuel projects. Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nicole-ghio/new-report-once-again-sho_b_7102638.html
  21. Global Reporting Initiative. (2018). Retrieved from: http://database.globalreporting.org/
  22. Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? whose value? whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2017). Investor implications of divesting from fossil fuels. Global Finance Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.10.004.
  27. Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2006). Corporate sustainability reporting: An overview. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 301–324). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Houldin, M. (2001). Overview. In R. Gray, J. Bebbington, & D. Walters (Eds.), Accounting for the environment. London: Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Hunt, C., & Weber, O. (2019). Fossil fuel divestment strategies: Financial and carbon related consequences. Organization and Environment, 32(1), 41–61.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618773985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Initiative, C. B. (2018). Bonds and climate change – The state of the market 2018. London: Climate Bonds Initiative.Google Scholar
  31. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England Wales. (2003). Information for better markets new reporting models for business. London: ICAEW.Google Scholar
  32. International Finance Corporation. (2011). Update of IFC’s policy and performance standards on environmental and social sustainability, and access to information policy. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. International Finance Corporation. (2012). IFC performance standards on environmental and social sustainability (p. 72). Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation. http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+sustainability/publications/publications_handbook_pps.Google Scholar
  34. ISO. (2017). International organization for standardization. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/home.html
  35. Kaya, I. (2016). The mandatory social and environmental reporting: Evidence from France. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 206–213.Google Scholar
  36. Khodorkovsky, M. (2008, September 29). Etymology of company. Retrieved from: https://www.altalang.com/beyond-words/2008/09/29/etymology-of-companion/
  37. KPMG. (2003). Building a new reporting and communications model: A new source of competitive advantage. Melbourne: KPMG.Google Scholar
  38. KPMG. (2011). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  39. Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, & J. Moon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (1st ed., pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kynge, J., & Hook, L. (2018, December 12). Development bank halts coal financing to combat climate change. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  41. Labatt, S., & White, R. R. (2007). Carbon finance. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Lawrence, R. F., & Thomas, W. L. (2004). The equator principles and project finance: Sustainability in practice? Natural Resources and Environment, 19(2), 20.Google Scholar
  43. MacDonald, K. I. (2010). The devil is in the (bio)diversity: Private sector engagement and the “restructuring” of biodiversity conservation. Antipode, 42(3), 513–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mercure, J. F., Pollitt, H., Viñuales, J. E., Edwards, N. R., Holden, P. B., Chewpreecha, U., et al. (2018). Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nature Climate Change. Retrieved from doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1.
  46. Nattrass, B., & Altomare, M. (1999). The natural step for business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Nolet, G., Vosmer, W., de Bruijn, M., & Braly-Cartillier, I. (2014). Managing environmental and social risks, a roadmap for National Development Banks in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from Washington, DC. http://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/6437/CMF%20MON%20Managing%20Environmental%20and%20Social%20Risks.pdf?sequence=1
  48. Orlitzky, M. (2008). Corporate social performance and financial performance: A research synthesis. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  49. Owen, D. L., & O’Dwyer, B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The reporting assurance dimension. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  50. Oyegunle, A., & Weber, O. (2015). Development of sustainability and green banking regulations – Existing codes and practices (65). Retrieved from Waterloo. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/development-of-sustainability-and-green-banking-regulations-existing-codes-and-practice
  51. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2.Google Scholar
  52. Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reichelt, H. (2010). Green bonds: A model to mobilise private capital to fund climate change mitigation and adaptation projects. The EuroMoney Environmental Finance Handbook, 1–7.Google Scholar
  54. Richardson, B. J., & Cragg, W. (2010). Being virtuous and prosperous: SRI’s conflicting goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 21–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0632-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rikhardson, P., Bennett, M., Bouma, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2005). Environmental management accounting: Innovation or managerial fad? In P. Rikhardsson, M. Bennett, J. Bouma, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Implementing environmental management accounting. Status and challenges (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosen, C. (Ed.). (2000). World resources 2000–2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  57. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2006). Corporate sustainability accounting: A nightmare or a dream coming true? Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. SDG Compass. (2017). The goals. Retrieved from: https://sdgcompass.org/sdgs/
  60. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Basel: Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.Google Scholar
  61. The Equator Principles. (2013). The equator principles. Retrieved from Geneva.Google Scholar
  62. UNEP Finance Initiative. (2018). Principles for responsible banking – Shaping our future. Geneva: UNEP Finance Initiative.Google Scholar
  63. WBCSD. (2017). World business council for sustainable development. Retrieved from: http://www.wbcsd.org/
  64. Weber, O. (2014). Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(5), 303–317.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785.
  65. Weber, O. (2016a). Equator principles reporting: Factors influencing the quality of reports. International Journal of Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility, 1(2), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weber, O. (2016b). Impact investing. In O. M. Lehner (Ed.), Routledge handbook on social and sustainable finance (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Weber, O. (2017). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 358–385.  https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weber, O. (2018). Financial sector sustainability regulations and voluntary codes of conduct: Do they help to create a more sustainable financial system? In T. Walker, S. D. Kibsey, & R. Crichton (Eds.), Designing a sustainable financial system: Development goals and socio-ecological responsibility (pp. 383–404). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weber, O., & Acheta, E. (2014). The equator principles: Ten teenage years of implementation and a search for outcome (CIGI papers series) (p. 20). Waterloo: CIGI.Google Scholar
  70. Weber, O., & Oni, O. (2015). The impact of financial sector sustainability regulations on banks (65). Retrieved from Waterloo, ON.Google Scholar
  71. Weber, O., & Saravade, V. (2019). Green bonds – Current development and their future (p. 32). Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
  72. Weber, O., Fenchel, M., & Scholz, R. W. (2008a). Empirical analysis of the integration of environmental risks into the credit risk management process of European banks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber, O., Koellner, T., Habegger, D., Steffensen, H., & Ohnemus, P. (2008b). The relation between the GRI indicators and the financial performance of firms. Progress in Industrial Ecology, 5(3), 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weber, O., Hoque, A., & Islam, A. M. (2015). Incorporating environmental criteria into credit risk management in Bangladeshi banks. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(1–2), 1–15. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1008736.
  75. Westphal, M. I., Canfin, P., Ballesteros, A., & Morgan, J. (2015). Getting to $100 billion: Climate finance scenarios and projections to 2020. Retrieved from Washington, DC: http://www.wri.org/publication/getting-100-billion-climate-finance-scenarios-and-projections-2020
  76. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wright, C., & Rwabizambuga, A. (2006). Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: An examination of the equator principles. Business and Society Review, 111(1), 89–117. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00263.x.
  78. Yang, A., & Cui, Y. (2012). Global coal risk assessment: Data analysis and market research. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  79. Yuan, F., & Gallagher, K. P. (2015). Greening development finance in the Americas. Retrieved from Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  80. Zhang, B., Yang, Y., & Bi, J. (2011). Tracking the implementation of green credit policy in China: Top-down perspective and bottom-up reform. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4), 1321–1327. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479710004639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations