Advertisement

A Smart City Ecosystem Enabling Open Innovation

  • Dirk AhlersEmail author
  • Leendert W. M. Wienhofen
  • Sobah Abbas Petersen
  • Mohsen Anvaari
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1041)

Abstract

In this position paper we present IT-centered challenges that lie in designing an architecture for a flexible, open, transferable, and replicable smart city ecosystem spanning a plethora of suppliers and systems. The background is the smart city and energy project +CityxChange. Its vision is to enable the co-creation and development of Positive Energy Blocks in smart sustainable cities. It will include the development of a framework and supporting tools to enable a common energy market, supported by a connected community and city integration. It will explore influences of the energy transition into city operations and urban planning, the integration of e-Mobility as a Service (eMaaS) into positive energy communities, and the growth of local trading markets and new business models. Digitalization, open architectures, and open data need to support these processes for open urban innovation in the ICT-enabled city.

Keywords

Smart city Data architecture ICT ecosystem Enterprise architecture Open data Positive energy districts Energy transition Energy informatics eMaaS Community engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

+CityxChange (Positive City ExChange) is a smart city project under the Smart Cities and Communities topic that has been granted funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 824260. The main content of this paper corresponds to work that has been performed before the project start, as project development, requirements gathering, and aligning with project, city, and partner visions and approaches. It further includes initial refinements and findings within the project.

We thank our colleagues and project team members Markus Helfert, University of Limerick, and John Krogstie, NTNU, as well as the whole +CityxChange project and project preparation team for valuable discussions and contributions.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahlers, D., Driscoll, P., Löfström, E., Krogstie, J., Wyckmans, A.: Understanding smart cities as social machines. In: Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Social Machines, WWW 2016 Companion, IW3C2, pp. 759–764 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890594
  2. 2.
    Anthopoulos, L.: Defining smart city architecture for sustainability. In: Proceedings of 14th Electronic Government and 7th Electronic Participation Conference (IFIP2015), pp. 140–147 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anvaari, M., Cruzes, D.S., Conradi, R.: Smart grid software applications as an ultra-large-scale system: challenges for evolution. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT 2012, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2012.6175687
  4. 4.
    Appio, F.P., Lima, M., Paroutis, S.: Understanding smart cities: innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 142, 1–14 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldwin, E., Curley, M.: Managing IT Innovation for Business Value: Practical Strategies for IT and Business Managers. Intel Press (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellman, B., Griesi, K., Bergman, M.: Agile enterprise architecture: oxymoron or new vision. In: Proceedings of ISPIM 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox, A., Parslow, P., Lathouwer, B.D., Klien, E., Kempen, B., Lonien, J.: D4.2 – Definition of Smart City Reference Architecture. Technical report, ESPRESSO systEmic Standardisation apPRoach to Empower Smart citieS and cOmmunities (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curley, M., Salmelin, B.: Open Innovation 2.0: The New Mode of Digital Innovation for Prosperity and Sustainability. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62878-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities: Setting the framework for an ICT architecture of a smart sustainable city. Technical report, International Telecommunications Union (ITU) (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kakarontzas, G., Anthopoulos, L., Chatzakou, D., Vakali, A.: A conceptual enterprise architecture framework for smart cities: a survey based approach. In: 2014 11th International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B), pp. 47–54, August 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan, J.: Roadmap for open ICT ecosystems. Technical report, Open ePolicy Group, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khatoun, R., Zeadally, S.: Smart cities: concepts, architectures, research opportunities. Commun. ACM 59(8), 46–57 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2858789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, Heidelberg (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53933-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mamkaitis, A., Bezbradica, M., Helfert, M.: Urban enterprise: a review of smart city frameworks from an enterprise architecture perspective. In: 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nielsen, B.F., Baer, D., Lindkvist, C.: Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning; key challenges from seven norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 142, 142–153 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pautasso, C., Wilde, E.: Why is the web loosely coupled?: A multi-faceted metric for service design. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009, pp. 911–920. ACM (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1526709.1526832
  19. 19.
    Ratti, C., Claudel, M.: The City of Tomorrow: Sensors, Networks, Hackers, and the Future of Urban Life. Yale University Press, New Haven (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salhofer, P., Joanneum, F.: Evaluating the FIWARE platform: A case-study on implementing smart application with FIWARE. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 5797–5805 (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sessions, R.: A comparison of the top four enterprise-architecture methodologies. Technical report, ObjectWatch Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tomas, G.H.R.P., et al.: Smart cities architectures: A systematic review. In: ICEIS 2013 - 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Townsend, A.M.: Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Ahlers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Leendert W. M. Wienhofen
    • 2
  • Sobah Abbas Petersen
    • 3
  • Mohsen Anvaari
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and PlanningNTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Trondheim kommune, IT-tjenestenTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceNTNU – Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.ITARK consultingTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations