A Smart City Ecosystem Enabling Open Innovation
In this position paper we present IT-centered challenges that lie in designing an architecture for a flexible, open, transferable, and replicable smart city ecosystem spanning a plethora of suppliers and systems. The background is the smart city and energy project +CityxChange. Its vision is to enable the co-creation and development of Positive Energy Blocks in smart sustainable cities. It will include the development of a framework and supporting tools to enable a common energy market, supported by a connected community and city integration. It will explore influences of the energy transition into city operations and urban planning, the integration of e-Mobility as a Service (eMaaS) into positive energy communities, and the growth of local trading markets and new business models. Digitalization, open architectures, and open data need to support these processes for open urban innovation in the ICT-enabled city.
KeywordsSmart city Data architecture ICT ecosystem Enterprise architecture Open data Positive energy districts Energy transition Energy informatics eMaaS Community engagement
+CityxChange (Positive City ExChange) is a smart city project under the Smart Cities and Communities topic that has been granted funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 824260. The main content of this paper corresponds to work that has been performed before the project start, as project development, requirements gathering, and aligning with project, city, and partner visions and approaches. It further includes initial refinements and findings within the project.
We thank our colleagues and project team members Markus Helfert, University of Limerick, and John Krogstie, NTNU, as well as the whole +CityxChange project and project preparation team for valuable discussions and contributions.
- 1.Ahlers, D., Driscoll, P., Löfström, E., Krogstie, J., Wyckmans, A.: Understanding smart cities as social machines. In: Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Social Machines, WWW 2016 Companion, IW3C2, pp. 759–764 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890594
- 2.Anthopoulos, L.: Defining smart city architecture for sustainability. In: Proceedings of 14th Electronic Government and 7th Electronic Participation Conference (IFIP2015), pp. 140–147 (2015)Google Scholar
- 3.Anvaari, M., Cruzes, D.S., Conradi, R.: Smart grid software applications as an ultra-large-scale system: challenges for evolution. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT 2012, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2012.6175687
- 5.Baldwin, E., Curley, M.: Managing IT Innovation for Business Value: Practical Strategies for IT and Business Managers. Intel Press (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Bellman, B., Griesi, K., Bergman, M.: Agile enterprise architecture: oxymoron or new vision. In: Proceedings of ISPIM 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
- 7.Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Brighton (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.Cox, A., Parslow, P., Lathouwer, B.D., Klien, E., Kempen, B., Lonien, J.: D4.2 – Definition of Smart City Reference Architecture. Technical report, ESPRESSO systEmic Standardisation apPRoach to Empower Smart citieS and cOmmunities (2016)Google Scholar
- 11.ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities: Setting the framework for an ICT architecture of a smart sustainable city. Technical report, International Telecommunications Union (ITU) (2015)Google Scholar
- 12.Kakarontzas, G., Anthopoulos, L., Chatzakou, D., Vakali, A.: A conceptual enterprise architecture framework for smart cities: a survey based approach. In: 2014 11th International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B), pp. 47–54, August 2014Google Scholar
- 13.Kaplan, J.: Roadmap for open ICT ecosystems. Technical report, Open ePolicy Group, Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
- 16.Mamkaitis, A., Bezbradica, M., Helfert, M.: Urban enterprise: a review of smart city frameworks from an enterprise architecture perspective. In: 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
- 17.Nielsen, B.F., Baer, D., Lindkvist, C.: Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning; key challenges from seven norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 142, 142–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Pautasso, C., Wilde, E.: Why is the web loosely coupled?: A multi-faceted metric for service design. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009, pp. 911–920. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1526709.1526832
- 19.Ratti, C., Claudel, M.: The City of Tomorrow: Sensors, Networks, Hackers, and the Future of Urban Life. Yale University Press, New Haven (2016)Google Scholar
- 20.Salhofer, P., Joanneum, F.: Evaluating the FIWARE platform: A case-study on implementing smart application with FIWARE. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 5797–5805 (2018)Google Scholar
- 21.Sessions, R.: A comparison of the top four enterprise-architecture methodologies. Technical report, ObjectWatch Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
- 22.Tomas, G.H.R.P., et al.: Smart cities architectures: A systematic review. In: ICEIS 2013 - 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2013)Google Scholar
- 23.Townsend, A.M.: Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2013)Google Scholar