Advertisement

New Applications of a Supervised Computational Intelligence (CI) Approach: Case Study in Civil Engineering

  • Ameer A. JeburEmail author
  • Dhiya Al-Jumeily
  • Khalid R. Aljanabi
  • Rafid M. Al Khaddar
  • William Atherton
  • Zeinab I. Alattar
  • Adel H. Majeed
  • Jamila Mustafina
Chapter
Part of the Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning book series (UNSESUL)

Abstract

In this study, artificial neural network (ANN) techniques are used in an attempt to predict the nonlinear hyperbolic soil stress–strain relationship parameters (k and Rf). Two ANN models are developed and trained to achieve the planned target, in an attempt at making the experimental test (unconsolidated undrained triaxial test) unnecessary. The first is logarithm of modulus number (log k), and the second is failure ratio (Rf). A database of laboratory measurements comprises a total of (83) case records for modulus number (k) and failure ratio (Rf). Four parameters are considered to have the most significant impact on the nonlinear soil stress–strain relationship parameters, which are used as an independent input variables (IIVs) to the developed the proposed ANNs models. These comprise of: Plasticity index (PI), Dry unit weight (γdry), Water content (ωo), and Confining stress (σ3), the output models are respectively, (log k), and (Rf). Multilayer perceptron trainings using back-propagation algorithm are used in this work. The effect of a number of issues in relation to ANN construction such as ANN geometry and internal parameters on the performance of ANN models is investigated. Information on the relative importance of the factors affecting the (log k), and (Rf) is presented, and practical equations for their prediction are proposed.

Keywords

Artificial neural network (ANN) Soil stress–strain parameters Unconsolidated undrained triaxial test Supervised computational intelligence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research and Wasit University for the grant provided to carry out this research under the grant agreement number 162575, dated 28/05/2013, with the Liverpool John Moores University, university reference number (744221).

References

  1. 1.
    Abad, S., Yilmaz, M., Armaghani, D. J., & Tugrul, A. (2018). Prediction of the durability of limestone aggregates using computational techniques. Neural Computing and Applications, 29, 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Douma, O. B., Boukhatem, B., Ghrici, M., & Tagnit-Hamou, A. (2017). Prediction of properties of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network. Neural Computing and Applications, 28, S707–S718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirazi, A. Z., & Mohammadi, Z. (2017). A hybrid intelligent model combining ANN and imperialist competitive algorithm for prediction of corrosion rate in 3C steel under seawater environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 28, 3455–3464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millie, D. F., Weckman, G. R., Young II, W. A., Ivey, J. E., Carrick, H. J., & Fahnenstiel, G. L. (2012). Modeling microalgal abundance with artificial neural networks: Demonstration of a heuristic ‘grey-box’ to deconvolve and quantify environmental influences. Environmental Modelling and Software, 38, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jebur, A. A., Atherton, W., Al Khaddar, R. M., & Loffill, E. (2018b). Settlement prediction of model piles embedded in sandy soil using the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) training algorithm. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 36(5), 2893–2906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarawneh, B. (2017). Predicting standard penetration test N-value from cone penetration test data using artificial neural networks. Geoscience Frontiers, 8(1), 199–204.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moayedi, H., & Rezaei, A. (2017). An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand. Neural Computing and Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh, G., & Walia, B. S. (2017). Performance evaluation of nature-inspired algorithms for the design of bored pile foundation by artificial neural networks. Neural Computing and Applications, 28, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alizadeh, B., Najjari, S., & Kadkhodaie-Ilkhchi, A. (2012). Artificial neural network modeling and cluster analysis for organic facies and burial history estimation using well log data: A case study of the South Pars Gas Field, Persian Gulf, Iran. Computers and Geosciences, 45, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohammed, M. A., Ghani, M. K. A., & Hamed, R. I. (2017). Analysis of an electronic methods for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Prevalence, diagnosis, challenges and technologies. Journal of Computational Science, 21, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tarawneh, B. (2013). Pipe pile setup: Database and prediction model using artificial neural network. Soils and Foundations, 53(4), 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yadav, A. K., Malik, H., & Chandel, S. S. (2014). Selection of most relevant input parameters using WEKA for artificial neural network based solar radiation prediction models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng, Y., Barr, W., & Harper, W. F. (2013). Neural network processing of microbial fuel cell signals for the identification of chemicals present in water. Journal of Environmental Management, 120, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jaeel, A. J., Al-wared, A. I., & Ismail, Z. Z. (2016). Prediction of sustainable electricity generation in microbial fuel cell by neural network: Effect of anode angle with respect to flow direction. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 767, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen-Truong, H. T., & Le, H. M. (2015). An implementation of the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for simultaneous-energy-gradient fitting using two-layer feed forward neural networks. Chemical Physics Letters, 629, 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kriesel, D. (2011). Brief introduction to neural networks [Online]. University of Bonn, Germany. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from http://www.dkriesel.com/_media/science/neuronalenetze-en-zeta2-2col-dkrieselcom.pdf.
  17. 17.
    Jebur, A. A., Atherton, W., & Al Khaddar, R. M. (2018a). Feasibility of an evolutionary artificial intelligence (AI) scheme for modelling of load settlement response of concrete piles embedded in cohesionless soil. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(7), 705–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chokshi, P., Dashwood, R., & Hughes, D. J. (2017). Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based microstructural prediction model for 22MnB5 boron steel during tailored hot stamping. Computers and Structures, 190, 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caudill, M. (1988). Neural networks primer. Part III. AI Expert, 3(6), 53–59.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ismail, A., & Jeng, D. S. (2011). Modelling load settlement behaviour of piles using High-Order Neural Network (HON-PILE model). Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence, 24(5), 813–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Janabi, K. R. (2006). Laboratory leaching process modeling in gypseous soils using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). PhD thesis, Building and Construction Engineering Department, University of Technology, Iraq.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garson, G. D. (1991). Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI Expert, 6, 46–51.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wong, K. S., & Duncan, J. M. (1974). Hyperbolic stress–strain parameters for nonlinear finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses. La Jolla, CA: College of Engineering, Office of Research Services, University of California.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abdellatif, M. E. M. (2013). Modelling the impact of climate change on urban drainage system. PhD thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jebur, A. A., Atherton, W., Alkhadar, R. M., & Loffill, E. (2017). Piles in sandy soil: A numerical study and experimental validation. Procedia Engineering, 196, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boscardin, M. D., Selig, E. T., Lin, R.-S., & Yang, G.-R. (1990). Hyperbolic parameters for compacted soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 116, 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ameer A. Jebur
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Dhiya Al-Jumeily
    • 3
  • Khalid R. Aljanabi
    • 4
  • Rafid M. Al Khaddar
    • 1
  • William Atherton
    • 1
  • Zeinab I. Alattar
    • 2
  • Adel H. Majeed
    • 2
  • Jamila Mustafina
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringAl-Mustansiriya UniversityBaghdadIraq
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of AnbarRamadiIraq
  5. 5.Kazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations