Advertisement

Public Participation Approaches for a New Era in Dryland Science and Stewardship in the Global South

  • D. L. CoppockEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Climate book series (SPCL)

Abstract

The drylands of the Global South are facing challenges from human population growth, unsustainable land-management practices, and climate change. Such problems are complex and can no longer be adequately addressed using traditional, top-down means. Rather, increased reliance on public participation is needed to better identify key research questions and interventions that promote positive change. Major actors in these approaches would include communities, applied researchers, outreach agents, policy makers, and planners working in tandem. The process involves embracing “engaged research” within a framework of an “innovation system”—referred to here by the acronym ERIS. Such concepts have recently gained acceptance, and now is the time to implement them. Project donors are key to this transformation of applied research and professional practice because they can provide incentives. ERIS projects must be long term with a diversity of pragmatic and transdisciplinary scholarly achievements. An ERIS platform for inter-project coordination could be part of a comprehensive Agadir platform. The main option to institutionalize ERIS approaches is via policies that alter how government agencies and their stakeholders work together.

Keywords

Action research Engaged research Extension Community-based research Innovation systems Outreach Participatory rural appraisal Participatory policy making Participatory planning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald and the editorial team for the invitation to submit this chapter. Several illustrations (i.e., Table 7.2 and Figs. 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6) have been reprinted from a paper by Coppock (2016) that has open-access status with Elsevier. Brian Kartchner (Utah State University) assisted with producing the figures.

References

  1. Birkland T (2016) An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making, 4th edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonfil G (1970) La antropología social en México: Ensayo sobre sus nuevas perspectivas. An Antropol 7:24–39Google Scholar
  3. Cauvin T (2016) Public history: a textbook of practice, 1st edn. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavalier D, Kennedy E (2016) The rightful place of science: citizen science. Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers R (1983) Rural development: putting the last first. Longman, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22(7):953–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coppock DL (2016) Cast off the shackles of academia! Use participatory approaches to tackle real-world problems with underserved populations. Rangelands 38(1):5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppock DL, Desta S, Tezera S, Gebru G (2009) An innovation system in the rangelands: using collective action to diversify livelihoods among settled pastoralists in Ethiopia. In: Sanginga P, Waters-Bayer A, Kaaria S, Njuki J, Wettasinha C (eds) Innovation Africa: enriching farmer’s livelihoods. Earthscan, London, pp 104–119Google Scholar
  9. Coppock DL, Fernández-Giménez M, Hiernaux P, Huber-Sannwald E, Schloeder C, Valdivia C, Arredondo JT, Jacobs M, Turin C, Turner M (2017) Rangelands in developing nations: conceptual advances and societal implications. In: Briske D (ed) Rangeland systems: processes, management, and challenges. Springer, Berlin, pp 569–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Silva G, Wignaraja P, Mehta N, Rahman M (1979) Bhoomi Sena, a struggle for people’s power. Dev Dialogue 2:3–70Google Scholar
  11. Derr T (2018) Climate change perceptions and adaptation among small-scale farmers in Uganda: a community-based approach. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Logan, UTGoogle Scholar
  12. Fals Borda O (1979) The problem of investigating reality in order to transform it: the Colombian experience. Dialect Anthropol 4(1):33–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feagin JR, Vera H, Ducey K (2015) Liberation Sociology, 3rd edn. Paradigm Publishers, BoulderCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsyth A (2012) Commentary: alternative cultures in planning research—from extending scientific frontiers to exploring enduring questions. J Plan Educ Res 32(2):160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friere P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Gramberger M (2001) Citizens as partners: OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy making. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwood D, Levin M (2007) Introduction to action research: social research for social change, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang J, Li Y, Fu C et al (2017) Dryland climate change: recent progress and challenges. Rev Geophys 55(3):719–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly E (2010) Community planning: an introduction to the comprehensive plan, 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Narayanasamy N (2009) Participatory rural appraisal: principles, methods, and application. Sage Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  22. Overdevest C, Huyck Orr C, Stepenuck K (2004) Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Human Ecol Rev 11:177–185Google Scholar
  23. Priscoli J (2004) What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important? Water Int 29(2):221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Röling N (2009) Conceptual and methodological developments in innovation. In: Sanginga P, Waters-Bayer A, Kaaria S, Njuki J, Wettasinha C (eds) Innovation Africa: enriching farmers’ livelihoods. Earthscan, London, pp 9–34Google Scholar
  26. Sanginga PA, Waters-Bayer A, Kaaria S, Njuki J, Wettasinha C (2009) Innovation Africa: beyond rhetoric to praxis. In: Sanginga P, Waters-Bayer A, Kaaria S, Njuki J, Wettasinha C (eds) Innovation Africa: enriching farmers’ livelihoods. Earthscan, London, pp 374–386Google Scholar
  27. Shaner W, Phillipp P, Schmehl W (1982) Farming systems research and development: guidelines for developing countries. Consortium for International Development, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  28. Umemoto K (2001) Walking in another’s shoes: epistemological challenges in participatory planning. J Plan Educ Res 21:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valencia-Sandoval C, Flanders D, Kozak R (2010) Participatory landscape planning and sustainable community development: methodological observations from a case study in rural Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan 94:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waters-Bayer A, Sanginga P, Kaaria S, Njuki J, Wettasinha C (2009) Innovation Africa: an introduction. In: Sanginga P, Waters-Bayer A, Kaaria S, Njuki J, Wettasinha C (eds) Innovation Africa: enriching farmers’ livelihoods. Earthscan, London. pp 1–5 (chapter 1)Google Scholar
  31. Whitmer A, Ogden L, Lawton J, Sturner P, Groffman P, Schneider L, Hart D, Halpern B, Schlesinger W, Raciti S, Bettez N, Ortega S, Rustad L, Pickett S, Killilea M (2010) The engaged university: providing a platform for research that transforms society. Front Ecol Environ 8(6):314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whyte W (1989) Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research. Sociol Forum 4(3):367–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environment and SocietyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations