Advertisement

Social Theories

  • Boris Shishkov
Chapter
Part of the The Enterprise Engineering Series book series (TEES)

Abstract

In this chapter, we are considering social theories. They are relevant to the human aspects concerning enterprise systems and EIS. As mentioned already, this is important for “grounding” our modeling views: in line with what was discussed in the previous chapters, we argue that human behavior, human decisions, human communication, human failures, and so on are all about the functioning of any enterprise system or EIS. For this reason, we need to be explicit in considering the human aspects when modeling/designing such systems. Further, just referring to a theory would be insufficiently useful because aligning concepts and views to a particular theory is not trivial—we claim that this could only be achieved if concepts (and views) are bridged to theories, driven by particular concerns since only such an approach can justify the selection of particular theories. For this reason, we firstly present several important concerns (inspired by [1]), in line with discussions carried out in the previous two chapters:

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shishkov B (2005) Software specification based on re-usable business components. Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BMSD. In: The international symposium on business modeling and software design. http://www.is-bmsd.org
  3. 3.
    Cordeiro J, Filipe J, Liu K (2009) Towards a human oriented approach to information systems development. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on enterprise systems and technology (I-WEST). SCITEPRESS, Sofia, BulgariaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirschheim R, Klein H, Lyytinen K (1995) Information systems development and data modeling—conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cordeiro J, Filipe J, Liu K (2010) NOMIS: a human centred modelling approach for information systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on enterprise systems and technology (I-WEST). SCITEPRESS, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holt A (1997) Organized activity and its support by computer. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winograd TA (1988) Language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. In: Greif I (ed) Computer supported cooperative work: a book of reading. Morgan Kaufmann, San MateoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bunge MA (1979) Treatise on basic philosophy, A world of systems, vol 4. D. Reidel Publishing Company, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietz JLG (1999) Understanding and modeling business processes with DEMO. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on conceptual modeling (ER), 15–18 Nov 1999. Springer—LNCS, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietz JLG (2003) The atoms, molecules and fibers of organizations. Data Knowl Eng 47:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dietz JLG (2006) Enterprise ontology, theory and methodology. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DEMO. The EEI DEMO methodology. http://www.ee-institute.org/en/demo
  14. 14.
    Liu K (2000) Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    CLOSER. In: The international conference on cloud computing and service science. http://closer.scitevents.org
  16. 16.
    Habermas J (1981) Theorie des Kommunikatives Handelns. Erster Band, SuhrkampVerlag, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cobley P, Jansz L (2001) Introducing semiotics. Icon Books, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stamper R (2000) Organizational semiotics—information without the computer? In: Liu K, Clarke RJ, Andersen PB, Stamper RK (eds) Information, organization, and technology—studies in organizational semiotics. Kluwer, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stamper R (1996) Signs, information, norms and systems. In: Holmqvist B, Andersen PB (eds) Signs of work: semiotics and information processing in organizations. Walter de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pierce CS (1998) Principles of philosophy. In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (eds) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Thoemmes, BristolGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stamper R (1997) Organizational semiotics. In: Mingers J, Stowell F (eds) Information systems: an emerging discipline? McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stamper R, Liu K, Hafkamp M, Ades Y (1997) Signs plus norms—one paradigm for organizational semiotics. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on computational semiotics, Paris, France, 26–27 May 1997Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stamper R (1992) Language and computer in organized behavior. In: van de Riet RP, Meersman RA (eds) Linguistic instruments in knowledge engineering. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Shishkov
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Information SciencesUniversity of Library Studies and Information TechnologiesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Institute of Mathematics and InformaticsBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Institute for Collaboration and Research on Enterprise Systems and TechnologySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations