Advertisement

MD Aware pp 89-100 | Cite as

Class 6: Responding to Suffering

  • Stephen Liben
Chapter

Abstract

This sixth class has students explore different ways of responding to the universal experiences of pain and suffering that are either overtly or covertly embedded in patients’ reasons for seeking medical care. A subject that is rarely explored within the formal medical curriculum, how to respond helpfully to suffering, is an everyday challenge for clinicians. The etymology of the word “patient” comes from the Latin word for suffering. Patients, those who suffer, seek out medical care to help them feel better and eliminate, or at least reduce, their suffering.

Keywords

Suffering Pain Mortality salience Terror management theory Loving kindness Soundscape Mindfulness 

References

  1. 1.
    Cassel EJ. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(11):639–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCracken LM, Gauntlett-Gilbert J, Vowles KE. The role of mindfulness in a contextual cognitive-behavioural analysis of chronic pain-related suffering and disability. Pain. 2007;151(1):63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veehof MM, Oskam MJ, Schreurs KMG, Bohlmeijer ET. Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2011;152(3):533–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wetherell JL, Afari N, Rutledge T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2011;152(9):2098–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M. Pain and behavioral medicine: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halifax J. A heuristic model of enactive compassion. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012;6(2):228–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solomon S, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T. A terror management theory of social behavior: the psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1991;24:93–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60328-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ardnt J, Vess M, Cox C, Goldenberg J, Lagle S. The psychological effect of thoughts of personal mortality on cardiac risk assessment. Med Decis Mak. 2009;29(2):175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solomon S. The effects of mortality salience and neuroticism on medical students’ treatment preferences for patients with terminal illnesses. Unpublished pilot data. Skidmore College; 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilpin R. The use of Theravāda Buddhist practices and perspectives in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Contemporary Buddhism. 2008;9(2):227–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14639940802556560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davidson RJ, Kaszniak AW. Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. Am Psychol. 2015;70(7):581–92.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039512.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Liben
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill Programs in Whole Person CareMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations