Advertisement

Informed Consent: Process and Practice in the Context of Office-Based Oral Surgery

  • Eric R. BernsteinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Informed consent is a mechanism for adherence to the ethical principle of patient autonomy; moreover, as a corollary to the ethical principle, it is a practical way of ensuring that patients are not deceived or coerced into or out of particular treatment decisions. Though informed consent is often “practiced” as merely the act of getting a signature on a form, it is more aptly conceptualized as a process with both ethical and legal implications. This chapter approaches informed consent first from a general overview of the concept and then with a focus on some issues of particular relevance in the context of office-based oral surgery. After presenting a brief history of informed consent, different approaches to informed consent are described and legal standards are discussed. The second half of the chapter explores informed consent with specific respect to elective procedures, pediatric patients and special needs patients, prescribing opioids, the administration of anesthesia, and implications of technology on informed consent.

Keywords

Informed consent Legal Ethics Patient Malpractice 

References

  1. 1.
    Berg JW, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Parker LS. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(1):54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Dental Association. Principles of ethics and code of professional conduct. With official advisory opinions revised to January 2005. Hawaii Dent J. 2007;38(1):9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 2.1.1 - Informed Consent 2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital (211 N.Y. 125). NY: Court of Appeals; 1914.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ketchup v. Howard (543 S.E.2d 371). Georgia: Court of Appeals; 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mukherjee A, Livinski AA, Millum J, Chamut S, Boroumand S, Iafolla TJ, et al. Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017;148(4):211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dym H. Risk management in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am. 2012;56(1):113–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.07.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alderson P, Goodey C. Theories of consent. BMJ. 1998;317(7168):1313–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolf A. The emergence and implementation of the advance informed agreement procedure. Governing global biodiversity. Abingdon: Routledge; 2017. p. 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benedict JL. The ethics of consent. a revised consent model for the transplantation of face and upper limbs: covenant consent, International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine, vol. 73. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernstein ER, Lazzarini Z. Medicolegal and ethical considerations in oral surgery by the general dentist. In: Ferneini EM, Goupil MT, editors. Evidence-Based oral srgery: a clinical guide for the general dental practitioner. New York: Springer; 2019.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts LW. Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(5):705–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamura-Lis W. Teach-back for quality education and patient safety. Urol Nurs. 2013;33(6):267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meisel A. The exceptions to the informed consent doctrine: striking a balance between competing values in medical decisionmaking. Wis L Rev. 1979;1979:413–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ridley DT. Informed consent, informed refusal, informed choice – what is it that makes a patient’s medical treatment decisions informed. Med Law. 2001;20(2):205–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gray DG, Franklin JL, Nicholls MK, Eaton KA, Barrett AW. Compliance of referral and hospital documentation with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines for the extraction of third molars: a comparative analysis of two NHS Trusts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(6):575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lynch J. Consent to treatment. Oxford: Radcliffe Pub; 2011.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cole CA. Implied consent and nursing practice: ethical or convenient? Nurs Ethics. 2012;19(4):550–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nievelstein RAJ, Frush DP. Should we obtain informed consent for examinations that expose patients to radiation? Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(3):664–9.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dobson T. Medical malpractice in the birthplace: resolving the physician-patient conflict through informed consent, standard of care, and assumption of risk. Nebraska Law Rev. 1986;65(4):655–85.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    American Law Institute. § 496A - assumption of risk. Restatement (Second) of Torts. St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers; 1965.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sawicki NN. Choosing medical malpractice. Wash Law Rev. 2018;93(2):891–966.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brady v. Urbas (631 Pa. 329). Pennsylvania: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania; 2015.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schneider v. Revici (817 F.2d 987). F.2d: 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals; 1987.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Assumption of the Risk. Physician’s Weekly 2017 May 23, 2017.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leffler WG, et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(11):1546–7.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bernal-Delgado E, Ridao-López M, Garcia-Armesto S. Medical practice variations in elective surgery. In: Medical Practice Variations. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Renton T, Woolcombe S, Taylor T, Hill CM. Oral surgery: part 1 introduction and the management of the medically compromised patient. BDJ. 2013;215:213.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nurok M, Czeisler CA, Lehmann LS. Sleep deprivation, elective surgical procedures, and informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2577–9.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1007901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spatz ES, Krumholz H, Moulton BW. The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3070.
  32. 32.
    Moulton B, Birkeland S. Shared decision-making and liability in aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(8):NP254–NP5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bruckner A, Zentner A, Klages U. Dental aesthetics, self-awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(5):507–14.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.5.507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rollert MK, Busaidy K, Krishnan D, Van Heukelom E. Anesthesia in outpatient facilities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(8, Supplement):e34–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.04.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Burkle C, Mann C, Steege J, Stokke J, Jacob A, Pasternak J. Patient fear of anesthesia complications according to surgical type: potential impact on informed consent for anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(10):1249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dineen KK, DuBois JM. Between a rock and a hard place: can physicians prescribe opioids to treat pain adequately while avoiding legal sanction? Am J Law Med. 2016;42(1):7–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morris BJ, Mir HR. The opioid epidemic: impact on orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(5):267–71.  https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McCabe MA. Involving children and adolescents in medical decision making: developmental and clinical considerations. J Pediatr Psychol. 1996;21(4):505–16.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/21.4.505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Coleman DL, Rosoff PM. The legal authority of mature minors to consent to general medical treatment. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):786.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Weiss A, Stern A, Dym H. Technological advances in extraction techniques and outpatient oral surgery. Dent Clin. 2011;55(3):501–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robert RC, Liu S, Patel C, Gonzalez ML. Advancements in office-based anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin. 2013;21(2):139–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2013.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boss EF, Mehta N, Nagarajan N, Links A, Benke JR, Berger Z, et al. Shared decision making and choice for elective surgical care: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(3):405–20.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815620558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Olsen BT, Sherwood CJ, Carrico CK, Priest JH, Laskin DM. Patient recall of information on a third molar informed consent video. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(12):2507–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gillies K, Cotton SC, Brehaut JC, Politi MC, Skea Z. Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:(11).  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.
  45. 45.
    Michalski A, Stopa M, Miśkowiak B. Use of multimedia technology in the doctor-patient relationship for obtaining patient informed consent. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:3994–9.  https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.894147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moore v. The Regents of the University of California et al. (271 Cal. Rptr. 146). California: Supreme Court; 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Connecticut School of Dental MedicineFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations