Advertisement

Introduction: Remembering, Forgetting, and the Power of Memory

  • Estelle Paranque
Chapter
Part of the Queenship and Power book series (QAP)

Abstract

Why is it so important to remember early modern monarchs? First, because the ways in which they were represented after their death show us how societies have evolved and shaped their ruling model from premodern monarchs’ own style of rulership. Second, it also demonstrates that representations are intertwined with reputations and influence, shedding light on the cult of power but also on the cult of personalities. European premodern kings and queens were important political players and were remembered as such but through memory other images take form and are remembered as celebrities in their own right. Remembering can take place through different spectrums: reputation, reinterpretation, and reincarnation. This collection features a series of case studies that offer new examinations of particular historical monarchical figures through these various lens: reputation through literature, reinterpretation through arts, and reincarnation in popular culture.

Bibliography

  1. Banerjee, Milinda. “The Royal Nation and Global Intellectual History: Monarchic Routes to Conceptualizing National Unity,” edited by Milinda Banerjee, Charlotte Backerra, and Cathleen Sarti, Transnational Histories of the ‘Royal Nation, 21–43. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barash, Jeffrey Andrew. Collective Memory and the Historical Past. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannadine, David. “The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the ‘Invention of Tradition’, c. 1820–1977,” edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger. The Invention of Tradition, 101–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Corns, Thomas N. ed. The Royal Image: Representations of Charles I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Ferro, Marc. “Film as an Agent, Product and Source of History.” Journal of Contemporary History, 18, 3 (1983): 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levin, Carole. “Elizabeth’s Ghost: The Afterlife of the Queen in Stuart England.” Royal Studies Journal 1 (2014): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. North, Janice, Alvestad, Karl C. and Woodacre, Elena, eds. Premodern Rulers and Postmodern Viewers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
  9. Ricoeur, Paul. Translated by Kathleen Blamey & David Pellauer, Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004, paperback edition 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Sanders, Julia. The Cambridge Introduction to Early Modern Drama, 1576–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Online Sources

  1. “Danny Boyle calls for beaches tribute for Armistice centenary.” https://news.sky.com/story/danny-boyle-calls-for-beaches-tribute-for-armistice-centenary-11518362
  2. “Souvenons-nous, pour demain” (let’s remember, for tomorrow). http://www.centenaire.org/fr

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Estelle Paranque
    • 1
  1. 1.New College of the HumanitiesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations