Advertisement

A Fuzzy-Based System for Actor Node Selection in WSANS: Simulation and Experimental Results

  • Donald ElmaziEmail author
  • Miralda Cuka
  • Makoto Ikeda
  • Keita Matsuo
  • Leonard Barolli
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 994)

Abstract

Wireless Sensor and Actor Network (WSAN) is formed by the collaboration of micro-sensor and actor nodes. The sensor nodes have responsibility to sense an event and send information towards an actor node. The actor node is responsible to take prompt decision and react accordingly. In order to provide effective sensing and acting, a distributed local coordination mechanism is necessary among sensors and actors. In this work, we consider the actor node selection problem and propose a fuzzy-based system (FBS) that based on data provided by sensors and actors selects an appropriate actor node. We use 3 input parameters: Distance to Event (DE), Remaining Energy (RE) and Transmission Range (TR). The output parameter is Actor Selection Decision (ASD). Based on these parameters, we implemented a testbed and carried out experiments to evaluate the implemented system in a real scenario. The evaluation results show that the proposed system makes a good selection of the actor node.

Keywords

WSANs Fuzzy Logic Testbed Transmissio 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Kasimoglu, I.H.: Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. J. (Elsevier), 2(4), 351–367 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. (Elsevier) 38(4), 393–422 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyinbode, O., Le, H., Takizawa, M.: A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 1(2/3), 130–136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahrepour, M., Meratnia, N., Poel, M., Taghikhaki, Z., Havinga, P.J.: Use of wireless sensor networks for distributed event detection in disaster management applications. Int. J. Space-Based Situated Comput. 2(1), 58–69 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haider, N., Imran, M., Saad, N., Zakariya, M.: Performance analysis of reactive connectivity restoration algorithms for wireless sensor and actor networks. In: IEEE Malaysia International Conference on Communications (MICC-2013), pp. 490–495, November 2013Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abbasi, A., Younis, M., Akkaya, K.: Movement-assisted connectivity restoration in wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 20(9), 1366–1379 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, X., Liang, X., Lu, R., He, S., Chen, J., Shen, X.: Toward reliable actor services in wireless sensor and actor networks. In: 2011 IEEE 8th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), pp. 351–360, October 2011Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akkaya, K., Younis, M.: Cola: a coverage and latency aware actor placement for wireless sensor and actor networks. In IEEE 64th Conference on Vehicular Technology (VTC-2006) Fall, pp. 1–5, September 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kakarla, J., Majhi, B.: A new optimal delay and energy efficient coordination algorithm for wsan. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS), pp. 1–6, December 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmazi, D., Cuka, M., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L.: A fuzzy-based system for actor node selection in wsans for improving network connectivity and increasing number of covered sensors. In: International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, pp. 3–15. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inaba, T., Sakamoto, S., Kolici, V., Mino, G., Barolli, L.: A CAC scheme based on fuzzy logic for cellular Networks considering security and priority parameters. In: The 9-th International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA-2014), pp. 340–346 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spaho, E., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Barolli, V., Iwashige, J.: A fuzzy-based system for peer reliability in JXTA-overlay P2P considering number of interactions. In: The 16th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2013), pp. 156–161 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuo, K., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Mino, G., Barolli, L.: FACS-MP: a fuzzy admission control system with many priorities for wireless cellular networks and its performance evaluation. J. High Speed Netw. 21(1), 1–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(3), 445–456 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Inaba, T., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L., Uchida, K.: Integrating wireless cellular and ad-hoc networks using fuzzy logic considering node mobility and security. In: The 29th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA-2015), pp. 54–60 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kulla, E., Mino, G., Sakamoto, S., Ikeda, M., Caballé, S., Barolli, L.: FBMIS: a fuzzy-based multi-interface system for cellular and ad hoc networks. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-2014), pp. 180–185 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elmazi, D., Kulla, E., Oda, T., Spaho, E., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L.: A comparison study of two fuzzy-based systems for selection of actor node in wireless sensor actor networks. J. Ambient. Intell. Hum.Ized Comput. pp. 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. Commun. ACM, pp. 77–84 (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spaho, E., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Ikeda, M.: Trustworthiness in P2P: performance behaviour of two fuzzy-based systems for JXTA-overlay platform. Soft Comput. 18(9), 1783–1793 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inaba, T., Sakamoto, S., Kulla, E., Caballe, S., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L.: An integrated system for wireless cellular and ad-hoc networks using fuzzy logic. In: International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS-2014), pp. 157–162 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matsuo, K., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L.: A multi-modal simulation system for wireless sensor networks: a comparison study considering stationary and mobile sink and event. J. Ambient. Intell. Humanized Comput. 6(4), 519–529 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolici, V., Inaba, T., Lala, A., Mino, G., Sakamoto, S., Barolli, L.: A fuzzy-based CAC scheme for cellular networks considering security. In: International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2014), pp. 368–373 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Matsuo, K., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F.: A comparison study for two fuzzy-based systems: improving reliability and security of jxta-overlay p2p platform. Soft Comput. 20(7), 2677–2687 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsuo, K., Elmazi, D., Liu, Y., Sakamoto, S., Mino, G., Barolli, L.: FACS-MP: a fuzzy admission control system with many priorities for wireless cellular networks and its perforemance evaluation. J. High Speed Netw. 21(1), 1–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mendel, J.M.: Fuzzy logic systems for engineering: a tutorial. Proc. IEEE 83(3), 345–377 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Elmazi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miralda Cuka
    • 2
  • Makoto Ikeda
    • 1
  • Keita Matsuo
    • 1
  • Leonard Barolli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication EngineeringFukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT)FukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT)FukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations