Advertisement

The Rally Course: Learners as Co-designers of Out-of-Classroom Language Learning Tasks

  • Niina LiljaEmail author
  • Arja Piirainen-Marsh
  • Brendon Clark
  • Nicholas B. Torretta
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 38)

Abstract

This chapter introduces a “Rally Course” as a novel CA-inspired approach to teaching a second language. This approach builds on an understanding of language learning as a social process that is closely intertwined with L2 speakers’ evolving membership in the surrounding community. It addresses the need to develop experiential pedagogies that widen learners’ opportunities for interaction and support the socialisation process. Building on recent pedagogical initiatives supporting language learning in the wild, we illustrate the overall structure of the Rally Course, describe the main materials that were designed to support the learning objectives and present a case analysis of a student carrying out a pedagogical activity supported by the materials.

Keywords

Interaction navigator Journey map Mapping activity Photo journal Rally Course 

References

  1. Barraja-Rohan, A. M. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 479–507.Google Scholar
  2. Betz, E. M., & Huth, T. (2014). Beyond grammar: Teaching interaction in the German language classroom. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 47(2), 140–163.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, B., & Lindemalm, K. (2011). Språkskap: Swedish as a social language. Stockholm: Folkuniversitetet & Interactive Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, B., Wagner, J., Lindemalm, K., & Bendt, O. (2011). Språkskap: Supporting second language learning “in the wild”. In Conference paper presented at Include 2011, London, April 18–20.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 2016), 19–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301.Google Scholar
  6. Eskildsen, S. W., & Markee, N. (2018). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In R. Alonso Alonso (Ed.), Speaking in a second language (pp. 69–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  7. Eskildsen, S. W., & Theodórsdóttir, G. (2017). Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 143–164.Google Scholar
  8. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2013). Recurring and shared gestures in the L2 classroom: Resources for teaching and learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 139–161.  https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0007.Google Scholar
  9. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015). Embodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65(2), 419–448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12106.Google Scholar
  10. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2018). From trouble in the talk to new resources – The interplay of bodily and linguistic resources in the talk of a novice speaker of English as a second language. In S. Pekarek Doehler, E. González-Martínez, & J. Wagner (Eds.), Documenting change across time: Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 143–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Eskildsen, S. W., Pekarek Doehler, S., Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Hellermann, J. (this volume). Introduction: On the complex ecology of language learning ‘in the wild’. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. P. Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Converation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 1–21). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Farrell, T. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300.Google Scholar
  14. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a ‘reconceptualised’ SLA. Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 800–819.Google Scholar
  15. Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Greer, T. (this volume). Noticing words in the wild. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 131–158). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, J.-K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). In S. Pekarek Doehler (Ed.), L2 interactional competence and development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
  19. Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Evidence of language learning in longitudinal studies of other-initiated repair. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147–172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  20. Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). On the contingent nature of language learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
  21. Hellermann, J., Thorne, S. L., & Haley, J. (this volume). Building socio-environmental infrastructures for learning in the wild. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 193–218). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. CARM = http://www.carmtraining.org/home. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.
  23. Kasper, G., & Burch, R. (2016). Focus on form in the wild. In R. A. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 198–232). Bristol: Channel View Publications. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  24. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). Conversation analysis as an approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Knutson, S. (2003). Experiential learning in second-language classrooms. TESL Canada Journal, 20(2), 55–64.Google Scholar
  26. Kohonen, V., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P., & Lehtovaara, J. (2011). Experiential learning in foreign language education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kunitz, S. (2013). Group planning among L2 learners of Italian: A conversation analytic perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  28. Kunitz, S. (2015). Scriptlines as emergent artifacts in collaborative group planning. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 135–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.012.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, Y. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction. Text and Talk, 30(4), 403–422.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, J., & Burch, A. R. (2017). Collaborative planning in process: An ethnomethodological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 536–575.Google Scholar
  31. Lilja, N. (2014). Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.011.Google Scholar
  32. Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2016). Älypuhelimet oppimistoimintaa jäsentämässä [The smart phone as a resource for organizing learning activity]. In A. Solin, J. Vaattovaara, N. Hynninen, U. Tiililä, & T. Nordlund (Eds.), Kielenkäyttäjä muuttuvissa instituutioissa. The language user in changing institutions (AFinLA yearbook 2016. Publications of the Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics 74) (pp. 43–64). Jyväskylä: AfinLA.Google Scholar
  33. Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). Connecting the language classroom and the wild: Re-enactments of language use experiences. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 594–623.Google Scholar
  34. Majlesi, A. R., & Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(3–4), 193–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.004.Google Scholar
  35. Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behaviour tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052.Google Scholar
  36. Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63(3), 629–664.Google Scholar
  37. Markee, N., & Seo, M.-S. (2009). Learning talk analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(1), 37–63.Google Scholar
  38. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 323–347.Google Scholar
  39. Murphy, K. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(4), 267–278.Google Scholar
  40. Murphy, K. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, (156), 113–145.Google Scholar
  41. Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151.Google Scholar
  42. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  43. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (this volume). On the reflexive relation between developing L2 interactional competence and evolving social relationships: A longitudinal study of word-searches in the ‘wild’. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 51–76). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (2016). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578.Google Scholar
  45. Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Lilja, N. (this volume). How wild can it get? Managing language learning tasks in real life service encounters. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 161–192). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–270). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  47. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  48. Stokoe, E. (2014). The Conversation Analytic Role-play Method (CARM): A method for training communication skills as an alternative to simulated role-play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 255–265.Google Scholar
  49. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2016). “achJA, dann kenn ich das auch!” Managing understanding and knowledge: On teaching response tokens in the German language classroom. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 49(2), 199–213.Google Scholar
  50. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011a). Language learning activities in everyday situations: Insisting on TCU completion in second language talk. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 185–208). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  51. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011b). Second language interaction for business and learning. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 93–116). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  52. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2018). L2 teaching in the wild: A closer look at correction and explanation practices in everyday L2 interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 30–35.Google Scholar
  53. Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). Achieving intersubjectivity and doing learning: The use of English as a lingua franca in Icelandic L2. Nordand, 6(2), 59–85.Google Scholar
  54. Thorne, S. (2013). Language learning, ecological validity and innovation under conditions of superdiversity. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature, 6(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
  55. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.Google Scholar
  56. Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–102). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  57. Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2015). Doing reflective practice: A data-led way forward. ELT Journal, 69(4), 351–362.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niina Lilja
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arja Piirainen-Marsh
    • 2
  • Brendon Clark
    • 3
  • Nicholas B. Torretta
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Technology and CommunicationTampere UniversityTampereFinland
  2. 2.Department of Language and Communication StudiesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  3. 3.Umeå Institute of DesignUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations