Advertisement

Introduction: On the Complex Ecology of Language Learning ‘in the Wild’

  • Søren W. EskildsenEmail author
  • Simona Pekarek Doehler
  • Arja Piirainen-Marsh
  • John Hellermann
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 38)

Abstract

This introduction explicates the central issues informing the chapters in the volume. We outline the epistemological development of Second Language Acquisition research as it has evolved from being predominantly individual-cognitive to a more pluralistic endeavor in which social approaches to cognition and learning are becoming central. Social interaction has been recognized as key to language learning since the 1970’s but the field is still lacking in research that studies the everyday social-interactional ecology in which the L2 speaker acts. We argue that it is time to broaden contexts for empirical investigations to study language learning in the full ecology of ‘the wild’, that is, in out-of-classroom, real world settings that put into play the multisemiotic resources inhabiting the worlds of L2 speakers.

The contributions to the volume scrutinize the affordances of ‘the wild’ for the development of L2 interactional competence, investigate how L2 speakers configure learning opportunities in the wild, and analyze possible ways of integrating in-the-wild-experiences into the L2 classroom agenda. Leading to new empirical understandings of the richness of the affordances for L2 learning that emerge in people’s lifeworlds, this affects our conception of L2 learning, as product and process, and holds important implications for teaching practices.

Keywords

Second language acquisition (SLA) Learning in the wild Usage-based Conversation analysis 

References

  1. Achiba, M. (2012). Development of interactional competence. Changes in participation over cooking sessions. Pragmatics and Society, 3(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner – An introduction to exploratory practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Anya, U. (2017). Racialized identities in second language learning: Speaking blackness in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, D. (Ed.). (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barraja-Rohan, A.-M. (2015). "I told you": Storytelling development of a Japanese learning English as a second language. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 271–304). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (2002). Implementing task-based language teaching. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 96–106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, E., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Tracking change over time in second language talk-in-interaction: A longitudinal case study of storytelling practices. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 67–102). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? Modern Language Journal, 87, 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burch, R. A. (2014). Pursuing information. A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies. Language Learning, 64(3), 651–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cadierno, T., & Eskildsen, S. W. (Eds.). (2015). Usage-based perspectives on second language learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 91, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, B., & Lindemalm, K. (2011). Språkskap—Swedish as a social language. Stockholm: Ergonomidesign, Folkeuniversitetet and Interactive Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, B., Wagner, J., Lindemalm, K., & Bendt, O. (2011). Språkskap: Supporting second language learning ‘in the wild.’ INCLUDE 11. International conference on inclusive design proceedings. Royal College of Art. http://include11.kinetixevents.co.uk/rca/rca2011/paper_final/F514_1578.PDF. Accessed 8 Jan 2019.
  17. Cole, M., Engström, Y., & Salomon, G. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Pietro, J.-F., Matthey, M., & Py, B. (1989). Acquisition et contrat didactique: les sequences potentiellement acquisitionnelles de la conversation exolingue. In D. Weil & H. Fugier (Eds.), Actes du Troisième Colloque Régional de Linguistique (pp. 99–124). Strasbourg: Université des Sciences Humaines et Université Louis Pasteur.Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, D. P., Belnap, R. K., & Hillstrom, R. (2013). Social network development, language use, and language acquisition during study abroad: Arabic language learners’ perspectives. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 22, 84–110.Google Scholar
  21. Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Egbert, M. (2004). Other-initiated repair and membership categorization—Some conversational events that trigger linguistic and regional membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1467–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Egbert, M., Niebecker, L., & Rezarra, S. (2004). Inside first and second language speakers’ trouble in understanding. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 178–200). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, N. C. (2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009a). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009b). Constructions and their acquisition. Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 187–220.Google Scholar
  28. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language. Introduction to the special section. Annual review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 337–373). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  32. Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). Negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eskildsen, S. W. (2018a). “We’re learning a lot of new words”: Encountering new L2 vocabulary outside of class. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eskildsen, S. W. (2018b). L2 constructions and interactional competence: Subordination and coordination in English L2 learning. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp. 61–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  36. Eskildsen, S. W., & Majlesi, A. R. (2018). Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Eskildsen, S. W., & Markee, N. (2018). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In R. Alonso Alonso (Ed.), Speaking in a second language (pp. 69–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eskildsen, S. W., & Theodórsdóttir, G. (2017). Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015a). Sprogsbrugsbaseret læring i en tosproget hverdag [Usage-based learning in everyday bilingual practice]. Nydanske Sprogstudier [Studies in Modern Danish], 48, 71–104.Google Scholar
  40. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015b). Embodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65(2), 419–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2018a). From trouble in the talk to new resources – The interplay of bodily and linguistic resources in the talk of a speaker of English as a second language. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. González-Martínez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 143–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2018b). “Language learning in the wild” som praksisorienteret sprogundervisning [“Language learning in the wild” as practice-oriented language teaching]. Sprogforum, 66, 62–70.Google Scholar
  43. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a locial accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  46. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program. Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lantham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  47. Greer, T. (2013). Word search sequences in bilingual interaction: Codeswitching and embodied orientation toward shifting participant constellations. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hall, J. K. (1993). The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hall, J. K. (1995). Aw, man, where we goin?’: Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37–62.Google Scholar
  50. Hall, J. K. (2018). From L2 interactional competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualising the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hall, J. K., Cheng, A., & Carlson, M. T. (2006). Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 220–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hatch, E. M. (1978). Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  54. Hauser, E. (2013). Stability and change in one adult’s second language English negation. Language Learning, 63(3), 463–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. He, A. W., & Young, R. (1998). Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  56. Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147–172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hinkel, E. (2014). Culture and pragmatics in language teaching and learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 394–408). Boston: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
  59. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Hyland, F. (2004). Learning autonomously: Contextualizing out-of-class English language learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  62. Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher turn allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction. A multisemiotic perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  64. Kääntä, L., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2013). Manual guiding in peer group interaction: A resource for organizing a practical classroom task. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 322–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kääntä, L., Jauni, H., Leppänen, S., Peuronen, S., & Paakkinen, T. (2013). Learning English through social interaction: The case of Big Brother 2006, Finland. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 340–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kanagy, R. (1999). Interactional routines as a mechanism for L2 acquisition and socialization in an immersion context. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1467–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kasper, G., & Burch, R. A. (2016). Orienting to focus on form in the wild. In R. A. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 198–232). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (2015). Conversations-for-learning: Institutional talk beyond the classroom. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 390–408). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning, 52(Supplement 1), 1–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kim, Y. (2009). The Korean discourse markers -nuntey and kuntey in native-nonnative conversation: An acquisitional perspective. In H. T. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 317–350). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  74. Kolstrup, K. L. (2015). Opportunities to speak. A qualitative study of a second language in use. PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  75. Koshik, I. (2002). Alternative questions in pedagogical error correction sequences. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 35, 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings. Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 645–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kunitz, S., Sert, O., & Markee, N. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Sociocultural theory. A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Liddicoat, A. (2011). An introduction to conversation analysis (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  85. Lilja, N. (2014). Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). Connecting the language classroom and the wild: Re-enactments of language use experiences. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 594–623.Google Scholar
  87. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  89. Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 65(1), 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second-language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  91. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah: Larence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Markee, N. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of classroom interaction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  94. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Masuda, K. (2011). Acquiring interactional competence in a study abroad context: Japanese 31 language learners’ use of the interactional particle ne. The Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. McLeod, A. K. (2017). Service learning and community engagement for English classes. English Teaching Forum, 55, 20–27.Google Scholar
  98. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mori, J. (2004). Pursuit of understanding: Rethinking ‘negotiation of meaning’ in view of projected action. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 157–177). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  100. Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48, 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nguyen, H. & Kasper, G. (Eds.) (2009). Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  104. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. Harlow: Longman/Pearson.Google Scholar
  105. Norton, B., & McKinney, C. (2011). An identity approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 73–94). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Ochsner, R. (1979). A poetics of second language acquisition. Language Learning, 29, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 32–53). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Ishida, M. (2011). Engaging in another person’s telling as a recipient in L2 Japanese: Development of interactional competence during one-year study-abroad. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 Learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 45–85). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  110. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘Learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 105–126). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing ‘methods’ for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 206–243). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  114. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2018). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 555–578.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Pedersen, M. S. (2018). Samspil – sprogdidaktiske tilgange til arbejdsrettet andetsprogsundervisning [Togetherness – language didactic approaches to work-directed second language teaching]. Sprogforum, 66, 15–23.Google Scholar
  116. Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Pickard, N. (1995). Out-of-class language learning strategies: Three case studies. Language Learning Journal, 12(1), 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Pickard, N. (1996). Out-of-class language learning strategies. ELT Journal, 50(2), 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2011). Enacting interactional competence in gaming activities: Co-producing talk with virtual others. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 19–44). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Piirainen–Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2009). Collaborative game-play as a site for participation and situated learning of second language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2014). Asymmetries of knowledge and epistemic change in social gaming interaction. Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 1022–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Roehr-Brackin, K. (2014). Explicit knowledge and processes from a usage-based perspective: The developmental trajectory of an instructed L2 learner. Language Learning, 64(4), 771–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1976). Methods and morphemes in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Roever, C., & Kasper, G. (2018). Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sahlström, F. (2011). Learning as social action. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 45–65). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Salaberry, M. R., & Kunitz, S. (Eds.). (2019). Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  128. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  131. Schumann, J. H. (1983). Art and science in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 33(Special Issue), 49–75.Google Scholar
  132. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  133. Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis. An introduction. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  135. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  136. Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). “New” mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 820–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Taguchi, N. (2014). Development of interactional competence in Japanese as a second language: Use of incomplete sentences as interactional resources. Modern Language Journal, 98, 518–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  139. The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011a). Language learning activities in everyday situations: Insisting on TCU completion in second language talk. In G. Palotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 185–208). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  141. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011b). Second language interaction for business and learning. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 56–93). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  142. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2018). L2 teaching in the wild: A closer look at correction and explanation practices in everyday L2 interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 102. (Supplement, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). Achieving intersubjectivity and doing learning: The use of English as a lingua franca in Icelandic L2. Nordand, 6(2), 59–85.Google Scholar
  144. Thorne, S. L. (2013). Language learning, ecological validity and innovation under conditions of superdiversity. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature, 6(2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Thorne, S. L., & Hellermann, J. (2015). Sociocultural approaches to expert-novice relationships in second language interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 281–298). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  146. van Compernolle, R. A. (2015). The emergence of sociolingusitic competence in L2 classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 265–280). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  147. van den Branden, K. (2012). Task-based language education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 132–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  148. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  149. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wagner, J. (2010). Learning and doing learning in interaction: What do participants do in out-of-school second language talk? In Y. Kite & K. Ikeda (Eds.), Language learning and socialization through conversations (pp. 51–59). Osaka: Kansai University Center for Human Activity Theory.Google Scholar
  151. Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–101). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  152. Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  153. Waring, H. Z. (2018). Teaching L2 interactional competence: Problems and possibilities. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Watson-Gegeo, K. (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. Modern Language Journal, 88, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Wong, J. (2002). Applying conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40(1), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Youn, S. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32(2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Young, R. F. (2000). Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Vancouver: American Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  159. Zuengler, J., & Cole, K. (2005). Language socialization and second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 301–316). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Søren W. Eskildsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simona Pekarek Doehler
    • 2
  • Arja Piirainen-Marsh
    • 3
  • John Hellermann
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Design and CommunicationUniversity of Southern DenmarkSønderborgDenmark
  2. 2.Center for Applied LinguisticsUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Language and Communication StudiesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  4. 4.Applied LinguisticsPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations