Advertisement

Power, Politics and Pressure

  • Kate LanzEmail author
  • Paul Brown
Chapter
Part of the The Neuroscience of Business book series (TNoB)

Abstract

Men exist in an essentially competitive world, whereas females seek to inhabit an essentially collaborative one. This chapter considers the impact of testosterone on male behaviour and the role of competition. For women, oxytocin is the key hormone—the bonding hormone that promotes collaborative behaviour. These viewpoints are the filter for looking at how men and women experience office politics and male and female behaviours in the workplace.

References

  1. Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., et al. (2003). The systematising quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B. Special issue on Autism: Mind and Brain, 358, 361–374.Google Scholar
  2. Davey, K. M. (2008). Women’s accounts of organisational politics as a gendering process. Gender Work and Organization, 15(6), 650–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Social psychology series. Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Edelman, M. S., & Omark, D. R. (1973). Dominance hierarchies in young children. Social Science Information, 7(1), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffman, M. I. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviours. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 712–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. King, Denyer, Party. (2018). Organisational Dynamics, 33(4), 2004, Perrewe and Nelson, Harvard Business Review, September 2018.Google Scholar
  8. Knickmeyer, R. C., Wheelright et al. (2005). Gender typed play and amniotic testosterone. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes growing up apart and coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Phipps, S. T. A. (2015). Women versus men in entrepreneurship: A comparison of the sexes on creativity, political skill, and entrepreneurial intentions. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 21(1), 32–43 (Middle Georgia State College Leon C. Prieto, Clayton State University).Google Scholar
  11. Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for perceiving offensive behavior. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1649–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tannen, D. (1990). Gender differences in topical coherence: Creating involvement in best friends’ talk. Discourse Processes: Special Gender and Conversational Interaction, 13(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tremblay, R. E., Schaal, B., & Boulerice, B. (1998). Testosterone, physical aggression, dominance, and physical development in early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 22(4), 753–777. First Published December 1.Google Scholar
  14. Vaughn, D. A., Savjani, R. R., Cohen, M. S., & Eagleman, D. M. (2018). Empathic neural responses predict group allegiance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weisfield, G. E., et al. (1987). Stability of boys social success among peers over an eleven-year period. Contributions to Human Development, 18, 58–60.Google Scholar
  16. Westbrook, T. S., Veale, J. R., & Karnes, R. E. (2013). Multirater and gender differences in the measurement of political skill in organization. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(1).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21275. Accessed online 11 April 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BedfordUK
  2. 2.VientianeLaos

Personalised recommendations