Advertisement

1997–2010: The Restoration of Rights, Social Exclusion and Meta-governance

  • Jamie HardingEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The Labour governments of 1997 to 2010 adopted the concept of social exclusion to explain social problems and this was reflected in their approach to tackling rough sleeping, where numbers reduced by approximately two thirds. For homeless families, the duties created by the 1977 Housing (Homeless Persons) Act were effectively restored by the 2002 Homelessness Act, and successful efforts were made to reduce the use of bed-and-breakfast hotels as temporary accommodation. A range of measures sought to direct the work of local authorities and voluntary organisations, which were reflected particularly in increased local authority interventions to prevent homelessness. Devolution of housing powers to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland led to divergence in homelessness policy, with Scotland adopting a particularly radical approach.

Keywords

Meta-governance Devolution Bed-and-breakfast hotels Prevention Social exclusion 

References

  1. Alcock, P., Kendall, J., & Parry, J. (2012). From the third sector to the Big Society: Consensus or contention in the 2010 UK General Election? Voluntary Sector Review, 3(3), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin, A. (2008, September 24). Cleaned out. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2008/sep/24/homelessness.rough.sleepers
  3. Benn, M. (2000). New Labour and social exclusion. Political Quarterly, 71(3), 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boswell, C. (2009). The political use of expert knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boughton, J. (2018). Municipal dreams: The rise and fall of council housing. London, UK: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A. P. (2004). Anti-social behaviour, crime control and social control. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(2), 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvel, J. (2003, December 17). Westminster fights flood of soup runs. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/dec/17/homelessness.uknews
  8. Cattell, J., & Mackie, A. (2011). Adults facing chronic exclusion programme: Evaluation findings. London, UK: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  9. Cloke, P., May, J., & Johnsen, S. (2010). Swept up lives? Re-envisioning the homeless city. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, I., & Nevin, B. (2004). The road to renewal: The early development of the Housing Market Renewal programme in England. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Couch, C., Lord, A., & Crocks, M. (2015). Questioning the concept of market failure in housing: The case of Housing Market Renewal in Liverpool. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(4), 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, S. (2011). Outsourcing, public sector reform and the changed character of the UK state-voluntary sector relationship. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(7), 641–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2006a). A decent home: Definition and guidance for implementation June 2006—Update. London, UK: Department of Communities and Local Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-decent-home-definition-and-guidanceGoogle Scholar
  14. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2006b) Tackling the changing face of homelessness. Speech by Ruth Kelly MP at the Andy Ludlow Awards on 14 November 2006. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070701134647/http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=150446
  15. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2008a). No one left out: Communities ending rough sleeping. London, UK: HM Government.Google Scholar
  16. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2008b). Area based grant, general guidance 2008. London, UK: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  17. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2009). Homelessness prevention and relief: England 2009/10 experimental statistics. London, UK: Department of Communities and Local Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment.../1698295.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Our future homes. London, UK: Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions. (2002). Homelessness strategies: A good practice handbook. London, UK: Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions.Google Scholar
  20. Downe, J., Hartley, J., & Rashman, D. (2004). Evaluating the extent of inter-organizational learning and change in local authorities through the English beacon council scheme. Public Management Review, 6(4), 531–554.Google Scholar
  21. Dudleston, A., Alty, C., Henthorne, K., & Credland, S. (2004). The Act in action: As assessment of homelessness reviews and strategies. London, UK: Shelter.Google Scholar
  22. Ellison, N., & Pierson, C. (1998). Introduction. In N. Ellison & C. Pierson (Eds.), Developments in British Social Policy (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Fitzpatrick, S., Pleace, N., & Bevan, M. (2005). Final evaluation of the rough sleepers’ initiative. York, UK: University of York, Centre for Housing Policy.Google Scholar
  24. Harding, A., & Harding, J. (2006). Inclusion and exclusion in the re-housing of former prisoners. Probation Journal, 53(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harding, J., Irving, A., Fitzpatrick, S., & Pawson, H. (2013). Evaluation of Newcastle’s ‘co-operative’ approach to prevention and management of homelessness in light of changing government policy. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK: Northumbria University.Google Scholar
  26. Haugh, H., & Kitson, M. (2007). The Third Way and the third sector: New Labour’s economic policy and the social economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(6), 973–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heffernan, R. (2011). Labour’s New Labour legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown. Political Studies Review, 9(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heron, E., & Dwyer, P. (1999). Doing the right thing: Labour’s attempt to forge a new welfare deal between the individual and the welfare state. Social Policy and Administration, 33(1), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hetherington, P. (2004, December 13). Charity claims housing law bent. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/dec/13/homelessness.politics
  30. Hillman, S. (2010). The Foyer Federation: Aiming to transform the institutions and policies that currently help young people. Criminal Justice Matters, 80(1), 40–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Home Office. (2000). Listen Up. London, UK: Home Office.Google Scholar
  32. Johnsen, S., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2007). The impact of enforcement on street users in England. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, A., & Pleace, N. (2010). A review of single homelessness in the UK 2000–2010. London, UK: Crisis and the University of York.Google Scholar
  34. Keenan, P., Lowe, S., & Spencer, S. (1999). Housing abandonment in inner cities—The politics of low demand for housing. Housing Studies, 14(5), 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelly, J. (2006). Central regulation of English local authorities: An example of meta-governance? Public Administration, 84(3), 603–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knock, K. (2006). The North East referendum: Lessons learned? Parliamentary Affairs, 59(4), 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laurie, E. (2004). The Homelessness Act 2002 and housing allocations: All change or business as usual? Modern Law Review, 67(1), 48–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leather, P., & Nevin, B. (2012). The Housing Market Renewal Programme: Origins, outcomes and the effectiveness of public policy interventions in a volatile market. Urban Studies, 50(5), 856–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levitas, R. (2005). The inclusive society? Social exclusion and New Labour (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, J. (2005). New Labour’s approach to the voluntary sector: Independence and the meaning of partnership. Social Policy and Society, 4(2), 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lund, B. (2004). Housing policy: Coming in from the cold? In N. Ellison, D. Bauld, & M. Powell (Eds.), Social policy review 16: Analysis and debate in social policy (pp. 13–28). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lund, B. (2016). Housing politics in the United Kingdom. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lupton, R. (2013). Labour’s record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England, Social Policy in a Cold Climate. Summary Working Paper 6. London School of Economics and Political Science, London: UK. Retrieved from http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/WP06_SUMMARY.pdf
  44. Manwaring, R. (2016). From new/labour to Rudd/Gillard—Transferring social policy. Policy Studies, 37(5), 426–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. May, J., Cloke, P., & Johnsen, S. (2006). Shelter at the margins: New Labour and the changing state of emergency accommodation for single homeless people in Britain. Policy and Politics, 34(4), 711–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McKee, K., & Phillips, D. (2012). Social housing and homelessness policies. In G. Mooney & G. Scott (Eds.), Social justice and social policy in Scotland (pp. 223–228). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  47. Millar, J. (2003). From wage replacement to wage supplement: Benefits and tax credits. In J. Millar (Ed.), Understanding social security: Issues for policy and practice (pp. 123–143). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. (2018). Local authority housing statistics: Year ending March 2017. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-housing-statistics-year-ending-march-2017
  49. Ministry of Justice. (2011). Statistical notice: Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO) statistics England and Wales 2010. London, UK: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  50. Mooney, G., & Scot, G. (2012). Devolution, social justice and social policy: The Scottish context. In G. Mooney & G. Scott (Eds.), Social justice and social policy in Scotland (pp. 223–228). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  51. Moseley, A., & James, O. (2008). Central state steering of local collaboration: Assessing the impact of tools of meta-governance in homelessness services in England. Public Organization Review, 8, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mullins, D., & Niner, P. (1998). A price of citizenship? Changing access to social housing. In A. Marsh & D. Mullins (Eds.), Housing and public policy: Citizenship, choice and control (pp. 175–198). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. National Audit Office. (2010). The Decent Homes Programme, summary report by the comptroller and auditor general. HC 212. Session 2009–2010. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/0910212es.pdf
  54. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2003). Best value in housing and homelessness framework. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120920035507/http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/157311.pdf
  55. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2005). Survey of English local authorities about homelessness. London, UK: Homelessness and Housing Support Directorate, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  56. Parr, S. (2009). Confronting the reality of anti-social behaviour. Theoretical Criminology, 13(3), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pautz, H. (2011). New Labour in government: Think-tanks and social policy reform, 1997–2001. British Politics, 6(2), 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pawson, H. (2007). Local authority homelessness prevention in England: Empowering consumers or denying rights? Housing Studies, 22(6), 867–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pearce, J., & Vine, J. (2014). Quantifying residualisation: The changing nature of social housing in the UK. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(4), 657–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pitts, J. (2003). Youth justice in England and Wales. In R. Matthews & J. Young (Eds.), The new politics of crime and punishment (pp. 71–99). Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. Powell, M. (2000). New Labour and the third way in the British welfare state: A new and distinctive approach? Critical Social Policy, 20(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Power, A., & Mumford, K. (1999). The slow death of great cities? Urban abandonment or urban renaissance. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Power, A., Ploger, J., & Winkler, A. (2010). Phoenix cities: The fall and rise of great industrial cities. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Quilgars, D., Johnsen, S., & Pleace, N. (2008). Youth homelessness in the UK: A decade of progress? York: UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  65. Randall, G., & Brown, S. (2002). Helping rough sleepers off the street. London, UK: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Homelessness Directorate.Google Scholar
  66. Raynsford, N. (2016). Substance not spin: An insider’s view of success and failure in government. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sanderson, I. (2002). Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘modern’ local government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith, J. (2000, February 10). Death of the surcharge. Local Government Chronicle. Retrieved from https://www.lgcplus.com/death-of-the-surcharge/1390687.article
  69. Stewart, J. (2014). An era of continuing change: Reflections on local government in England 1974–2014. Local Government Studies, 40(6), 835–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tempest, M. (2006, January 10). Blair launches ‘respect’ action plan. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2006/jan/10/immigrationpolicy.ukcrime
  71. Tomaney, J. (2000). End of the empire state? New Labour and devolution in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Travers, T. (2004). Labour’s local record. New Economy, 11(2), 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wainwright, M. (2002, December 10). Cold ends blanket ban for homeless. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/dec/10/homelessness.uknews
  74. Welsh Assembly Government. (2003). National homelessness strategy. Cardiff, Wales: Welsh Assembly Government.Google Scholar
  75. Welshman, J. (2013). Underclass. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing plc.Google Scholar
  76. Whiteford, M. (2013). New Labour, street homelessness and social exclusion: A defaulted promissory note? Housing Studies, 28(1), 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilks-Heeg, S. (2009). New Labour and the reform of English local government, 1997–2007: Privatising the parts that Conservative governments could not reach? Planning, Practice and Research, 24(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson, S., & Lilly, A. (2016). Beacon Councils scheme case study. London, UK: Institute for Government. Retrieved from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/beacon-councils-scheme.pdfGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilson, W. (2015). Rough Sleepers Initiative (RSI) 1990–1999. House of Commons Library Standard Note SN07121, London, UK.Google Scholar
  80. Wilson, W., & Barton, C. (2018a). Households in temporary accommodation (England). House of Commons Briefing Paper Number 02110, London, UK.Google Scholar
  81. Wilson, W., & Barton, C. (2018b). Statutory homelessness in England. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper Number 01164, London, UK.Google Scholar
  82. Wilson, W., & Barton, C. (2018c). Comparisons of homeless duties in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper Number 7201, London, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations