Advertisement

Introduction: Definitions, Neglected Issues and Pre-War Position

  • Jamie HardingEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Homelessness is a difficult concept to define and quantify, although there is an emerging consensus about the situations that the term should apply to. The relationship between homelessness and broad inequalities, such as those around gender and ethnicity, is an area where there has been surprisingly little research. In considering the period before World War II, the approach to homeless people was largely based on assumptions that they were deviant. During the war, new services were made available for people who became homeless due to bombing and a consensus emerged that local authorities should have a major role in tackling the housing shortages once the conflict was over.

Keywords

Defining homelessness Quantifying homelessness Inequalities Victorian era World War II 

References

  1. Bailey, R., & Ruddock, J. (1972). The grief report. London, UK: Shelter.Google Scholar
  2. Bramley, G. (1988). The definition and measurement of homelessness. In G. Bramley, K. Doogan, P. Leather, A. Murie, & E. Watson (Eds.), Homelessness and the London housing market (pp. 24–43). Bristol, UK: School of Advanced, Urban Studies, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, T., Hunt, R., & Yates, N. (2000). Lettings: A question of choice. Coventry, UK: Chartered Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, T., & Yates, N. (2005). Allocations and lettings—Taking customer choice forward in England? European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(3), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buck, P. O., Toro, P. A., & Ramos, M. A. (2004). Media and professional interest in homelessness over 30 years (1974–2003). Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4(1), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambliss, W. J. (1964). A sociological analysis of the laws of vagrancy. Social Problems, 12(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramer, H. (2005). Informal and gendered practices in a Homeless Persons Unit. Housing Studies, 20(5), 737–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crisis. (2017). Not yet home: A history of Britain’s attempts to tackle homelessness. London, UK: Crisis.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, M., & Wyly, E. (2012). Class-ifying London. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 16(4), 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, A. (2007). Investigating journalist influences on political agendas at Westminster. Political Communication, 24(2), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2017). Statutory homelessness prevention and relief, October to December 2016: England. London, UK: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  12. Dwyer, P., & Brown, D. (2008). Accommodating ‘others’? Housing dispersed, forced migrants in the UK. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 30(3), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, R. (1995). Making temporary accommodation permanent: The cost for homeless families. Critical Social Policy, 15(1), 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ertas, N. (2015). Narrative policy framework: The influence of policy narratives on public opinion. Politics and Policy, 43(3), 426–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzpatrick, S. (2000). Young homeless people. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzpatrick, S., Pawson, H., Bramley, G., Wilcox, S., Watts, B., & Wood, J. (2018). The homelessness monitor: England 2018. London, UK: Crisis and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick, S., & Stephens, M. (1999). Homelessness, need and desert in the allocation of council housing. Housing Studies, 14(4), 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzpatrick, S., & Watts, B. (2017). Competing visions: Security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing. Housing Studies, 32(8), 1021–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser, D. (1984). The evolution of the British welfare state (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glastonbury, B. (1971). Homeless near a thousand homes. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  21. Grimshaw, J. M. (2008). Family homelessness: Causes, consequences and the policy response in England. London, UK: The British Library.Google Scholar
  22. Guo, L., & Vu, H. T. (2018). Media vs. Reality. The Agenda Setting Journal. Theory, Practice Critique, 2(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hilton, M., McKay, J., Crowson, N., & Mouhot, J. (2013). The politics of expertise: How NGOs shaped modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. House of Commons Library. (2016). Policy on the dispersal of asylum seekers. London, UK: House of Commons. Retrieved October 31, 2017, from http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CDP-2016-0095Google Scholar
  25. Humphreys, R. (1999). No fixed abode. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutson, S., & Liddiard, M. (1994). Youth homelessness. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, G. (1995). Leaving home. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lowe, S. (1997). Homelessness and the law. In R. Burrows, N. Pleace, & D. Quilgars (Eds.), Homelessness and social policy (pp. 19–34). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Lund, B. (1996). Housing problems and housing policy. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  30. Mayock, P., Sheridan, S., & Parker, S. (2015). ‘It’s just like we’re going around in circles and going back to the same thing …’ The dynamics of women’s unresolved homelessness. Housing Studies, 30(6), 877–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morris Committee. (1975). Housing and social work a joint approach. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Development Department, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  32. National Assistance Board. (1966). Homeless single persons. London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
  33. Niemi, V., & Ahola, E. (2017). Pathways between housing and homelessness of young income support recipients in Helsinki, Finland. European Journal of Homelessness, 11(2), 39–61.Google Scholar
  34. O’Neil, M., Gerstein Pineau, M., Kendall-Taylor, N., Volmert, D., & Stevens, A. (2017). Finding a better frame: How to create more effective messages on homelessness in the United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.crisis.org.uk/about-us/latest-news/report-reveals-public-attitudes-to-homelessness-and-role-of-sector-in-shaping-them/
  35. Peters, E. (2012). ‘I like to let them have their time.’ Hidden homeless First Nation people in the city and their management of household relationships. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(4), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powlick, P. J., & Katz, A. Z. (1998). Defining the American public opinion/foreign policy nexus. The International Studies Review, 42(1), 29–61.Google Scholar
  37. Quilgars, D., Johnsen, S., & Pleace, N. (2008). Youth homelessness in the UK: A decade of progress? York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Raynsford, N. (1986). The 1977 Housing (Homeless) Persons Act. In N. Deakin (Ed.), Policy change in government (pp. 33–62). London, UK: Royal Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  39. Raynsford, N. (2016). Substance not spin: An insider’s view of success and failure in government. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rex, J. (1971). The concept of housing class and the sociology of race relations. The Sociological Review, 12(3), 293–301.Google Scholar
  41. Richards, J. (1981). The Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977: A study in policy making. Working Paper 22, School of Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  42. Rose, A., Maciver, C., & Davies, B. (2016). Nowhere fast: The journey in and out of unsupported temporary accommodation. Manchester, UK: Institute of Public Policy Research North.Google Scholar
  43. Rose, M. E. (1971). English poor law 1780–1930. Newton Abbott, UK: David and Charles Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., & Hathaway, P. L. (2011). Narrative policy framework: The influence of media policy narratives on public opinion. Politics and Policy, 39(3), 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaw, I., Bloor, M., Cormack, R., & Williamson, H. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of hard-to-reach populations: The illustration of mark-recapture methods in the study of homelessness. Social Policy and Administration, 30(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shehata, A., & Stromback, J. (2013). Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 234–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snelling, C. (2017). Right to home? Rethinking homelessness in rural communities. London, UK: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  48. Thane, P. (1982). The foundations of the welfare state. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  49. UK Statistics Authority. (2015). Statistics on homelessness and rough sleeping in England. London, UK: UK Statistics Authority.Google Scholar
  50. Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2011). Minimal or massive? The political agenda-setting power of the mass media according to different methods. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(3), 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watchman, P. Q., & Robson, P. (1989). Homelessness and the law in Britain. Glasgow: The Planning Exchange.Google Scholar
  52. Watson, S., & Austerberry, H. (1986). Housing and homelessness: A Feminist perspective. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  53. Young, K., & Rao, N. (1997). Local government since 1945. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations