Advertisement

Dissipative Structure of Contact Interaction When Cutting Metals

  • V. A. Kim
  • B. Ya. Mokritsky
  • A. V. MorozovaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Processing of metals cutting proceeds in the system of non-equilibrium processes including high-speed plastic deformation of the cutoff layer, contact and frictional interaction of the processed material with the asymmetric cutting wedge and its wear. The synergetic algorithm of development of the non-equilibrium process provides the formation of dissipative structures which arise in the system of cutting of metals. The structure and mechanisms of functioning of a dissipative structure of contact and frictional interaction opening new approaches of the management of processes of cutting and quality of machining are considered. The dissipative structure includes the insular and continuous outgrowths covered with the adsorbed and amorphous superficial films, and also the deformation strengthened layer outgrowths. Dissipation is connected with the production of entropy and is carried out due to the work of frictional interaction on a forward surface of the cutting wedge and is defined by friction coefficient size between the sliding shaving and an external surface of outgrowths. The total coefficient of friction is defined by such dissipative structure and spontaneously reaches such sizes at which the density of thermal stream and tension in the zone of frictional interaction extend on the area of primary plastic deformations and minimize deformation processes of shaving formation and work in the shift plane. Varying the modes of cutting and the external technological environment when cutting materials, it is possible to influence actively the dissipative structure for ensuring the necessary quality and productivity of machining.

Keywords

Dissipative structure Contact interaction Metal cutting Non-equilibrium process Tool performance 

References

  1. 1.
    Ivanova V, Balankin L, Bunin I et al (1994) Synergetic and fractals in materials science. Science, MoscowzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim V (2001) Self-organization in the processes of hardening, friction and wear of the cutting tool. Dal’nauka, VladivostokGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Migranov M, Shuster L (2011) Features of thermodynamic processes on the cutting tool contact surfaces. Proc Samara Sci Center Russian Acad Sci 13(4(3)):1126–1129Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali A, Yaqub S, Usman M, Zuhaib KM, Khan AM et al (2018) Motion planning for a planar mechanical system with dissipative forces. Robot Auton Syst 107:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cramer MS, Crickenberger AB (1991) Dissipative structure of shock waves in dense gases. J Fluid Mech.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112091001441
  6. 6.
    De Matteis G, Brando G (2018) Comparative analysis of dual steel frames with dissipative metal shear panels. Key Eng Mater 763:735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kondoh Y (1993) Eigenfunction for dissipative dynamic operators and the attractor of the dissipative structure. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdisc Top 48(4):2975–2979Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malkov VB, Nikolaenko IV, Shveikin GP et al (2018) Formation of dissipative structures in an amorphous film. Dokl Phys Chem 478(2):39–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wessling B (1993) Dissipative structure formation in colloidal systems. Adv Mater 5(4):300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Artigiani R (1987) Revolution and evolution: applying Prigogine’s dissipative structures model. J Soc Biol Struct 10(3):249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Condepudi D, Prigogine I (2014) Modern thermodynamics: from heat engines to dissipative structures. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edelstein BB (1970) Instabilities associated with dissipative structure. J Theor Biol 26(2):227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prigogine I, Lefever R (1968) Symmetry breaking instabilities in dissipative systems. II. J Chem Phys 48:1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fazeli N, Tedrake R, Rodriguez A (2018) Identifiability analysis of planar rigid-body frictional contact. Robot Res 665–682Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jayaraman A (2019) Coarse-grained models for predicting structure and thermodynamics in polymer systems with specific and directional intermolecular interactions. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. Session H42: Dillon Medal Symposium, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neto AG, de Mattos Pimenta P, Wriggers P (2018) Contact between spheres and general surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328(1):686–716MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palasantzas G, Babamahdi Z, Svetovoy V (2018) Casimir interactions of complex surfaces and materials. Bulletin of the American Physical. APS, abstract id. V07.008Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen X, Deng X, Xu L (2018) A three-dimensional dynamic model for railway vehicle–track interactions. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040254
  19. 19.
    Guo J, Ding L, Gao H, Guo T, Liu G (2018) An apparatus to measure wheel-soil interactions on sandy terrains. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 23(1):352–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fedorov S, Assenova E (2017) Synergetic principle of self-organization during friction. Bull Sci Educ North-West Russia 3(3):1–20Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kremneva LV, Snegireva KK, Ershova IV (2014) Method of calculating the energy dissipation coefficient for cutting materials. Vestnik MGTU Stankin 4(31)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim V, Yakubov F, Skhirtladze A (2017) Mesomezanic contact interaction processes during friction and cutting of metals. TNT, Stary OskolGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim V, Karimov Sh (2014) Manifestation of physical mesomechanics during contact interaction and wear. Scientific notes of Komsomolsk-on-Amur State Technical University II-1 (18):79–85Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kabaldin Yu, Oleynikov A, Burkov A (2003) A synergistic approach to the analysis of dynamic processes in machine tools. Mach Tools 1(2):3–6Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zakovorotny V, Tung Fan Din, Bykador V (2014) Self-organization and bifurcation of a dynamic system for metal cutting. Proc Univ Appl Nonequilibr Dyn 22(3):26–39Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Verkhoturov A, Yakubov F, Kim V, Konevtsov L, Yakubov C (2014) The role of air in contact processes of metal cutting. Sci Notes Komsomolsk-on-Amur State Techn Univ III-1 (19):65–72Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yakubov Ch (2008) The hardening effect of the cutting fluid during metal cutting. Simferopol City Printing House, SimferopolGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim V, Otryaskina T, Sarilov M (2014) Structural and quantitative ratios of the process of chip formation. Fundam Res 6:933–936Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bobrov V, Granovsky G, Zorev N et al (1967) The development of the science of cutting metals. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Kim
    • 1
  • B. Ya. Mokritsky
    • 1
  • A. V. Morozova
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Komsomolsk-on-Amur State UniversityKomsomolsk-on-AmurRussia
  2. 2.Bryansk State Technical UniversityBryanskRussia

Personalised recommendations