Advertisement

Crises of the West: Liberal Identities and Ontological (In)Security

  • Marko LehtiEmail author
  • Henna-Riikka Pennanen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter scrutinizes the relationship between the current perceptions of crisis, the liberal order, and the idea of the West as its imagined owner. We approach crisis-talk as an expression of narrative power to contest, confirm, or constitute anew existing liberal identities. We argue that this crisis-talk is largely embedded in the question of securing symbolic agency, the role of a global leader, in an era that is seen to be characterized by the rise of non-Western actors and Western self-doubt regarding the liberal order. In this chapter, we identify three present crisis narratives of the West: the liberal internationalist, conservative (/libertarian), and right-wing populist. We compare them by introducing six variables: How the perception of crisis (1) generates anxiety, (2) (de)constructs self-esteem, (3) internalizes/externalizes feelings of shame, and (4) creates an antagonized Other. And on the other hand, (5) how crisis is interpreted, and (6) how the vision of an ideal, or alternative, world is positioned temporally. We place the three narratives into the context of the long genealogy of triumphalist and declinist narratives of the West, with the objective to bring closer together the prevailing international relations (IR) understanding of the West as a political and security community and a global actor with the understandings of the West as a marker of civilization, social imaginary, and identity.

Keywords

Crisis narratives Civilization Identity Ontological security 

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alcaro, Riccardo. 2018. The Liberal Order and Its Contestations. A Conceptual Framework. The International Spectator 53 (1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barma, Naazneen, Ely Ratner, and Steven Weber. 2007. A World Without the West. The National Interest 90: 23–30.Google Scholar
  4. Bessis, Sophie. 2003. Western Supremacy: The Triumph of an Idea. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bettiza, Gregorio. 2015. Constructing Civilisations: Embedding and Reproducing the ‘Muslim World’ in American Foreign Policy Practices and Institutions Since 9/11. Review of International Studies 41 (3): 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boffey, Daniel. 2018. Orbán Claims Hungary Is Last Bastion Against ‘Islamisation’ of Europe. The Guardian, February 18. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/18/orban-claims-hungary-is-last-bastion-against-islamisation-of-europe.
  7. Bonnett, Alastair. 2004. The Idea of the West: Culture, Politics and History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bottici, Chiara, and Benolt Challand. 2012 [2010]. The Myth of the Clash of Civilizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bowden, Brett. 2009. Introduction. In Civilization: Critical Concepts in Political Science, The Origins and Meaning of Civilization, ed. B. Bowden, vol. I, 1–18. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Brecher, Michael, and Jonathan Wilkefield. 1982. Crisis in World Politics. World Politics 34 (3): 380–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browning, Christopher S., and Marko Lehti. 2009. The West: Contested, Narrated and Clustered. In The Struggle for the West. A Divided and Contested Legacy, ed. Christopher S. Browning and Marko Lehti, 15–32. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browning, Christopher S., Pertti Joenniemi, and Brent J. Steele. Vicarious Identity in International Relations. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  13. Bruckner, Pascal. 2010. The Tyranny of Guilt: An Essay on Western Masochism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burnham, James. 1964. Suicide of the West: An Essay on the Meaning and Destiny of Liberalism. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  15. Chowdhry, Geeta. 2007. Edward Said and Contrapuntal Reading: Implications for Critical Interventions in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36 (1): 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen-Tanugi, Laurent. 2008. The Shape of the World to Come: Charting the Geopolitics of a New Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coker, Christopher. 2010. Rebooting the West: Can the Western Alliance Still Engage in War. In The Struggle for the West. A Divided and Contested Legacy, ed. Christopher S. Browning and Marko Lehti, 73–89. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Colgan, Jeff, and Robert Keohane. 2017. The Liberal Order Is Rigged. Fix It Now or Watch It Wither. Foreign Affairs 96 (3): 36–44.Google Scholar
  19. Collins, Randall. 2004. Civilizations as Ones of Prestige and Social Contact. In Rethinking Civilizational Analysis, ed. S.A. Arjomand and E.A. Tiryakian, 132–147. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dabashi, Hamid. 2001. For the Last Time Civilizations. International Sociology 16 (3): 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delpech, Therese. 2007. Savage Century: Back to Barbarism. Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
  22. Ferguson, Niall. 2011. Civilization: The West and the Rest. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2014. The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die? London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. Ferguson, Niall, Fareed Zakaria, and Rudyard Griffiths. 2017. Is This the End of the Liberal International Order? The Munk Debates. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  25. Flockhart, Trine. 2016. The Problem of Change in Constructivist Theory: Ontological Security Seeking and Agent Motivation. Review of International Studies 42 (5): 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Yascha Mounk. 2016. The Democratic Disconnect. Journal of Democracy 27 (3): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  28. Gong, Gerrit. 1984. The Standard of Civilization in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goody, Jack. 2010. The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, Martin, and Patrick Thaddeus Jackson. 2007. Introduction: Civilizations and International Relations Theory. In Civilizational Identity: The Production and Reproduction of ‘Civilizations’ in International Relations, ed. M. Hall and P.T. Jackson, 1–12. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen, Lene. 2017. Conclusion: The Ways of the West and the Road Ahead. In Uses of the West: Security and the Politics of Order, ed. G. Hellmann and B. Herborth, 280–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heller, Kathleen Margaret. 2006. The Dawning of the West: On the Genesis of a Concept. PhD Dissertation, University of Kings College Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2010. The West as a Concept of the World-Historical. Presented at the ISA Convention, New Orleans, 20 February 2010.Google Scholar
  34. Herborth, Benjamin, and Gunther Hellmann. 2017. Introduction: Uses of the West. In Uses of the West: Security and the Politics of Order, ed. G. Hellmann and B. Herborth, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Holton, Robert. 1987. The Idea of Crisis in Modern Society. The British Journal of Sociology 38 (4): 501–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huntington, Samuel. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  38. Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ifversen. 2008. Who Are the Westerners? International Politics 45 (3): 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ignazi, Piero. 2017. The Silent Counter-Revolution: Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right-Wing Parties in Europe. In The Populist Radical Right: A Reader, ed. C. Mudde, 313–337. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Ikenberry, G. John. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West. Foreign Affairs 87 (1): 23–37.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2011. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs 90 (3): 56–68.Google Scholar
  43. Ikenberry, G. John, Inderjeet Parmar, and Doug Stokes. 2018. Introduction: Ordering the World? Liberal Internationalism in Theory and Practice. International Affairs 94 (1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2017. After ‘the Clash’: Uses of ‘the West’ After the Cold War. In Uses of the West: Security and the Politics of Order, ed. G. Hellmann and B. Herborth, 83–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jacques, Martin. 2009. When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  46. Jahn, Beate. 2018. Liberal Internationalism: Historical Trajectory and Current Prospects. International Affairs 94 (1): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jouhki, Jukka, and Henna-Riikka Pennanen. 2016. The Imagined West: Exploring Occidentalism. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 41 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
  48. Kagan, Robert. 2004. Of Paradise and Power. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2008. The Return of History and the End of Dreams. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  50. Katzenstein, Peter. 2008. A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices. In Civilizations in World Politics. Plural and Pluralistic Perspectives, ed. P. Katzenstein, 1–40. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Kissinger, Henry. 1965. The Troubled Partnership. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  52. Koch, Robert, and Chris Smith. 2006. Suicide of the West. London: Continuum Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Koselleck, Reinhart, and Michaela Richter. 2006. Crisis. Journal of History of Ideas 67 (2): 35–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kupchan, Charles. 2012. No One’s World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kustermans, Jörg, and Erik Ringmar. 2011. Modernity, Boredom, and War: A Suggestive Essay. Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1775–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lebow, Richard. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lehti, Marko. 2010. American West vs. European West: A Struggle for Ownership and Legitimacy. In The Struggle for the West. A Divided and Contested Legacy, ed. Christopher S. Browning and Marko Lehti, 90–114. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Leonard, Mark. 2017. What Liberal World Order? European Council on Foreign Relations, March 1. http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_what_liberal_world_order_7242.
  59. Lepenies, Philipp. 2008. An Inquiry into the Roots of the Modern Concept of Development. Contributions to the History of Concepts 4 (2): 202–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Luce, Edward. 2018. The Retreat of Western Liberalism. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  61. Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan Lindberg. 2018. A Third Wave of Autocratization Is Here: What Is New About It? Democratization (online) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
  62. Mazarr, Michael, Astrid Stuth Cevallos, Miranda Priebe, Andrew Radin, Kathleen Reedy, Alexander Rothenberg, Julia Thompson, and Jordan Willcox. 2017. Measuring the Health of the Liberal International Order. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mazlish, Bruce. 2001. Civilization in a Historical and Global Perspective. International Sociology 16 (3): 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Miklóssy, Katalin, and Pekka Korhonen. 2010. Introduction. In The East and the Idea of Europe, ed. K. Miklóssy and P. Korhonen, ix–xvi. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Anchoring Europe’s Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities and Ontological Security. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 2702–2785.Google Scholar
  66. Morozov, Viatcheslav. 2013. Introduction: Locating International Democracy. In Decentring the West, ed. V. Morozov, 1–21. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  67. Moyo, Dambisa. 2011. How the West Was Lost. Fifty Years of Economic Folly and Stark Choices Ahead. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  68. Mudde, Cas. 2015. The Problem with Populism. The Guardian, February 17. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/17/problem-populism-syriza-podemos-dark-side-europe.
  69. ———. 2017. Conclusion: Studying Populist Radical Right Parties and Politics in the Twenty-First Century. In The Populist Radical Right: A Reader, ed. C. Mudde, 609–620. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. ———. 2018. How Populism Became the Concept That Defines Our Age. The Guardian, November 22. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/22/populism-concept-defines-our-age.
  71. Norrlof, Carla. 2018. Hegemony and Inequality: Trump and the Liberal Playbook. International Affairs 94 (1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. O’Hagan, Jacinta. 2002. Conceptualizing the West in International Relations: From Spengler to Said. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Parmar, Inderjeet. 2018. The US-Led Liberal Order: Imperialism by Another Name? International Affairs 94 (1): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pennanen, Henna-Riikka. 2015. Material, Mental, and Moral Progress: American Conceptions of Civilization in Late 19th Century Studies on “Things Chinese and Japanese.” Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  75. Peterson, John. 2018. Present at the Destruction? The Liberal Order in the Trump Era. The International Spectator 53 (1): 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Phillips, Warren, and Richard Rimkunas. 1978. The Concept of Crisis in International Politics. Journal of Peace Research 15 (3): 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roitman, Janet. 2011. Crisis. Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon. http://www.politicalconcepts.org/issue1/crisis/.
  78. ———. 2013. Anti-Crisis. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenblatt, Helena. 2018. The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century. ProQuest Ebook Central. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Spengler, Oswald. 1927 [1926]. The Decline of the West: Form and Actuality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  81. Steele, Brent. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stokes, Doug. 2018. Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order. International Affairs 94 (1): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Weber, Christian. 2017. Transatlantic Policies Towards China and Russia: Self-Conceptions and Contradictions of a Universalizing West. In Uses of the West: Security and the Politics of Order, ed. G. Hellmann and B. Herborth, 179–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wright, Thomas. 2017. All Measures Short of War: The Contest for the 21st Century & the Future of American Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Zarakol, Ayşe. 2010. Ontological (In)Security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan. International Relations 24 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. ———. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Zúquete, José Pedro. 2017. The European Extreme-Right and Islam. New Directions? In The Populist Radical Right: A Reader, ed. C. Mudde, 103–123. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tampere Peace Research Institute (TAPRI)Tampere UniversityTampereFinland
  2. 2.Turku Institute for Advanced StudiesUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations