Advertisement

A Non-world: Chinese Perceptions of the Western International Order

  • Matti PuranenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

As the West struggles, China, economically and politically stable, has increased its criticism toward the Western-led international order. According to Chinese arguments, the ongoing decade has demonstrated that the Western liberal international order is no more capable of solving the troubles of the globalizing world. It is as if the Western political imagination has run out of steam and it is now the responsibility of China to take the lead in stabilizing the world. On the side of the official statements, Chinese theorists of world politics are envisioning a new alternative world order, which would be based on a historical, sinocentric system that was in place in East Asia for thousands of years. According to Chinese theorists, this ‘tianxia system’ was based on completely different philosophical and institutional foundations, and it is a mere historical contingency that it was later left in the shadow of the Western international order. This ‘tianxia theory’ is one of the main proponents for a new ‘Chinese theory of world politics’. It is slowly influencing policy circles in China, and more importantly, globally challenging our ingrained conceptions on world politics. A large part of the work of the tianxia theorists consists of criticisms of the ‘west’: its religion, political thought, and ‘chaotic’ individualist nature. The chapter especially focuses on these critical narratives of the ‘west’.

Keywords

China International relations theory Narratives 

References

  1. Ban, Wang, ed. 2017. Chinese Visions of World Order: Tianxia, Culture, And World Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, Anne-Marie. 2012. State Confucianism, Chineseness, and Tradition in CCP Propaganda. In China’s Thought Management, ed. A.M. Brady, 57–76. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buruma, Ian, and Avishai Margalit. 2004. Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Callahan, William. 2008. Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony? International Studies Review 10: 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CCTV. 2017. Xi Jinping: Shijie geguo renmin yinggai bingchi ‘tianxia yijia’ de linian. 1 December. http://m.news.cctv.com/2017/12/01/ARTItpvfRkdaIkqyeFMQslkq171201.shtml.
  6. Ch’en, Jerome. 1979. China and the West: Society and Culture, 1815–1937. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Cheek, Timothy, ed. 2010. A Critical Introduction to Mao. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, Xiaomei. 1995. Occidentalism: A Theory of Counter-Discourse in Post-Mao China. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, Yawen & Wang, Yiwei. 2015. Tianming – Yige xin lingdaoxing guojia de dansheng (Mandate of Heaven – The Birth of a New Type of Leader Country). Beijing: Qunyan Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, Alexander. 2010. Third World Maoism. In A Critical Introduction to Mao, ed. Timothy Cheek, 288–312. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, Robert W. 1986. Social Forces, States and World Orders. In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. R.O. Keohane, 204–254. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyer, June Teufel. 2015. The ‘Tianxia Trope’: Will China Change the International System? Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96): 1015–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairbank, John K. 1968. A Preliminary Framework. In Chinese World Order, ed. J.K. Fairbank, 1–19. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ge, Zhaoguang 2016. Dui ‘tianxia’ de xiangxiang: yige wutuobang xiangxiang beihou de zhengzhi, sixiang yu xueshu. Aisixiang, October 14. http://www.aisixiang.com/data/92884.html.
  15. Guo, Yingjie. 2004. Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China: The Search for National Identity Under Reform. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson, Patrick. 2006. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of The West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jun, Deng, and Graig A. Smith. 2018. The Rise of New Confucianism and the Return of Spirituality to Politics in Mainland China. China Information 32 (2): 294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jouhki, Jukka, and Pennanen Henna-Riikka. 2016. The Imagined West: Exploring Occidentalism. Suomen Antropologi 41 (2): 10.Google Scholar
  19. Kallio, Jyrki. 2015. Toward a Harmonious World? Emerging Thinking on a Chinese International Relations Model. In New Trends and Challenges in China’s Foreign Policy, ed. J.Y.S. Cheng and M. Siika, 87–113. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2011. Tradition in Chinese Politics: The Party-state’s Reinvention of the Past and the Critical Response from Public Intellectuals. FIIA Report (27).Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2018. Xi Jinping Thought and China’s Future Foreign Policy: Multipolarity with Chinese Characteristics. FIIA Briefing Paper 243.Google Scholar
  22. Kang, David C. 2010. East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 2010. Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Keith, Ronald C. 2012. New History Inside Hu Jintao’s Foreign Policy: ‘Harmony’ Versus ‘Hegemony’. In China: A New Stage of Development for an Emerging Superpower, ed. J.Y.S. Cheng, 235–252. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Yangfan. 2016. Bei wudude tianxia zhixu (The Misinterpreted Tianxia Order). Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  26. Lu, Weiming, and Xiaoyu Zhao. 2009. Liang Shuming’s Viewpoint of Chinese and Western Cultures in the Substance of Chinese Culture. Contemporary Chinese Thought 40 (3): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacFarquhar, Roderick, ed. 2012. Politics in China: Sixty Years of The People’s Republic of China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mokry, Sabine. 2018. Decoding Chinese Concepts for the Global Order: How Chinese Scholars Rethink and Shape Key Ideas of Foreign Policy. MERICS China Monitor. https://www.merics.org/sites/default/files/2018-10/180927_MERICS_ChinaMonitor_Foreign_Policy.pdf.
  29. Nielsen, Ras Tind, and Peter Marcus Kristensen. 2014. ‘You Need To Do Something That The Westerners Don’t Understand’ The Innovation of a Chinese School of IR. In Chinese Politics and International Relations: Innovation and Invention, ed. N. Horsburg, 97–118. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Niquet, Valerie. 2012. ‘Confu Talk’: The Use of Confucian Concepts in Contemporary Chinese Foreign Policy. In China’s Thought Management, ed. A.M. Brady, 76–90. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Noessllt, Nele. 2015. Revisiting the Debate on Constructing a Theory of International Relations with Chinese Characteristics. The China Quarterly 222: 430–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perdue, Peter. 2015. The Tenacious Tribute System. Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96): 1002–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Puranen, Matti. 2019. “‘All Under Heaven as a One Family’: Tianxiaist Ideology and the Emerging Chinese Great Power Identity”. Journal of China and International Relations (7) 1.Google Scholar
  34. Qin, Yaqing. 2016. Guoji guanxi lilun zhongguo xuepai shengcheng de keneng he biran (The Possibility and Inevitability of the Chinese School of International Relations). Aisixiang, April 3, 2016. http://www.aisixiang.com/data/9329.html.
  35. ———. 2018. Relational Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ren, Xiao. 2014. Lun Zhongguode shijiezhuyi: duiwai guanxi sixiang he zhidu yanjiu zhi er (On Chinese cosmopolitanism: Studying the Thought and Institutions of Foreign Policy). Shijie Jingji yu Zhenghi 8: 30–45.Google Scholar
  37. Renmin Ribao. 2017. Xi Jinping shou ti ‘Liang ge yindao’ you shen yi. February 20, 2017. http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0220/c1001-29094518.html.
  38. Shi-Kupfer, Kristin, Ohlberg, Mareike, Lang, Simon, and Lang, Bertram. 2017. Ideas and Ideologies Competing for China’s Political Future: How Online Pluralism Challenges Official Orthodoxy. Merics Papers on China (5)Google Scholar
  39. Schneider, Florian. 2014. Reconceptualising World Order: Chinese Political Thought and Its Challenge to International Relations Theory. Review of International Studies 40 (4): 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz, Benjamin. 1968. The Chinese Perception of World Order, Past and Present. In Chinese World Order, ed. J.K. Fairbank, 276–288. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shang, Huipeng. 2009. ‘Lunren’ yu ‘tianxia’ – Jieshi yi chaogongtixi wei hexinde gudai dongya guoji zhixu (‘Tianxia and ethics’: Interpreting the Ancient East Asian Tributary System). Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu 2: 29–43.Google Scholar
  42. Sheng, Hong. 1996. Cong minzuzhuyi dao tianxiazhuyi (From Nationalism to Tianxiaism). Zhanlue yu Guanli (1): 14–19 http://www.aisixiang.com/data/18064.html.
  43. Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of Politics, Volume 1: Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spence, Jonathan. 1999. The Search for Modern China. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  45. Wang, Gungwu. 2013. Renewal: The Chinese State and the New Global History. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Xinhua. 2017. Shiba da yilai, Xi Jinping zheyang qiangdiao wenhua zixin (Since the 18th Congress of the CCP, Xi Jinping Has Emphasized Cultural Confidence). October 13, 2017. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-10/13/c_1121796384.htm.
  47. Xu, Jilin and Liu, Qing 2015. Xin tianxiazhuyi (New tianxiaism). Beijing: Shiji wenjing.Google Scholar
  48. Yan, Xuetong, ed. 2011. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2018. Chinese Values vs. Liberalism: What Ideology Will Shape the International Normative Order? Chinese Journal of International Politics 11 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, Feng. 2013. Chinese Exceptionalism in the Intellectual World of China’s Foreign Policy. In China Across The Divide: The Domestic and Global in Politics and Society, ed. R. Foot, 44–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang, Weiwei. 2012. Zhongguo chudong: baiguo shiye xia de guancha yu sikao (China Touches: Reflections Based on a Perspective of Hundred States). Shanghai: Shiji Chuban.Google Scholar
  52. Zhao, Tingyang. 2009. A Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-Under-Heaven (Tian-xia). Diogenes 221: 6–17.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2010. Tianxia tixide xiandai qishi (The Modern Lessons of the Tianxia System). Wenhua zongheng, June 12, 2010. http://www.21bcr.com/a/zazhiwenzhang/2010niandisanqi/2010/0612/847.html.
  54. ———. 2011. Tianxia tixi: shijie zhidu zhexue daolun (Tianxia System: a Philosophical Introduction for a World Institution). Beijing: Renmin Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2016. Tianxia tixide dangdaixing (The Contemporariness of the Tianxia System). Beijing: Zhongxin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  56. Zheng, Yongnian. 2011. Organizing China’s Inter-state Relations: From Tianxia ‘All-under-heaven’ to Modern International Relations. In China and International Relations: The Chinese View and the Contribution of Wang Gungwu, ed. Y. Zheng, 293–321. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations