Advertisement

Sensitivity of Atmospheric Composition Mesoscale Simulations in the Mediterranean to the Meteorological Data and Chemical Boundary Conditions

  • D. G. Amanatidis
  • S. Myriokefalitakis
  • Georgios Fanourgakis
  • N. Daskalakis
  • M. KanakidouEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Limited area models applied at higher resolution than global models and using datasets of higher resolution are generally expected to more accurately represent the spatiotemporal variability of key meteorological and climate parameters such as near surface temperature, pressure, wind speed and atmospheric composition. However, limited area models require boundary conditions and the accuracy of such datasets reflects on the accuracy of the mesoscale simulations of atmospheric composition, in particular of the longer-lived species. The effects of various resolution meteorological data and of different chemical boundary and initial conditions on the simulated concentrations of the chemical gases and aerosols in the Mediterranean have been here investigated. Two different simulations in three domains of progressively increasing horizontal resolution were performed for the year 2016 using the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) meteorological model with the chemistry module (WRF-Chem) and an additional one with different chemical boundary and initial conditions. Meteorology from the Global Forecast System (GFS) at two different horizontal resolutions (1 × 1° and 0.25 × 0.25°) available from NOAA has been used in the model to investigate their impact on the simulated air pollutants. The higher resolution meteorological input improves the comparison of model results to observations. The results are found sensitive to the chemical boundary and initial conditions.

References

  1. 1.
    B.J. Bloomer, J.W. Stehr, C.A. Piety, R.J. Salawitch, Observed relationships of ozone air pollution with temperature and emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L09803 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Camalier, W. Cox, P. Dolwick, The effects of meteorology on ozone in urban areas and their use in assessing ozone trends. Atmos. Environ. 41, 7127–7137 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.K. Emmons et al., Description and evaluation of the model for ozone and related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4). Geosci. Model Dev. 3, 43–67 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.A. Grell et al., Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6957–6975 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10119-2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Im et al., The impact of temperature changes on summer time ozone and its precursors in the Eastern Mediterranean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 3847–3864 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Kanakidou et al., Megacities as hot spots of air pollution in the East Mediterranean Atmospheric Environment (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Daskalakis et al., Large gain in air quality compared to an alternative anthropogenic emissions scenario. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 9771–9784 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9771-2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Amanatidis
    • 1
  • S. Myriokefalitakis
    • 2
    • 3
  • Georgios Fanourgakis
    • 1
  • N. Daskalakis
    • 3
  • M. Kanakidou
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Environmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, Department of ChemistryUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  2. 2.IERSDNational Observatory of AthensPenteliGreece
  3. 3.LAMOS, Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP)University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations