Advertisement

Methodological Strategies to Understand Smartphone Practices for Social Connectedness in Later Life

  • Mireia Fernández-ArdèvolEmail author
  • Andrea Rosales
  • Eugène Loos
  • Alexander Peine
  • Roser Beneito-Montagut
  • Daniel Blanche
  • Björn Fischer
  • Stephen Katz
  • Britt Östlund
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11593)

Abstract

Digital practices in later life are not yet well understood. Therefore, this paper discusses the framework for a research design project that aims at tracing differences and similarities in how older adults use their smartphones in circumstances in and outside their homes in Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Canada. The research questions of this international research project focus on the extent to which digital mobile practices relate to perceived social connectedness among older adults aged 55–79 years old. While studies have shown that the subjective experience of ‘being connected’ supports continued wellbeing in later life, there remains an insufficient understanding of the processes through which digital mediated social interaction is effective for social connectedness. The analytical framework of the project prioritizes the co-constituency of (digital) technology and ageing, and takes digital practices in everyday life as its entry point. The main data collection tool will be the tracking of smartphone activity of 600 older adults (150 per country) during four weeks. An online survey and qualitative interviews will gather data about the meanings of the quantified digital practices, and how they shape (if they do) the participants’ connection to the world. This approach will allow us not only to get insight into what older adults say how they used their smartphone but also to gain insight into their real-life daily use. The assessment of the challenges, strengths, and weaknesses of the methods contributes towards an accurate and appropriate interpretation of empirical results and their implications.

Keywords

Tracking Log data Survey data Interviews Mixed methods Research design Older adults Later life Smartphones Digital practices 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research project BConnect@Home (https://www.researchgate.net/project/BCONNECTHOME-Making-use-of-digital-devices-in-later-life) is funded by the JTP 2017 - JPI More Years, Better Lives (Grant Agreement 363850). The Netherlands: ZONMW (Project 9003037411); Spain: MINECO (ref. PCI-2017-080), FORTE (ref. 2017-02301); and Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (201704MYB-386097). It also received partial funding from the Ageing + Communication + Technology project http://actproject.ca/ (ref. 895-2013-1018, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada), and the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities (ref: FJCI-2015-24120).

References

  1. 1.
    Graafmans, J.A.M., Taipale, V., Charness, N. (eds.): Gerontechnology: A Sustainable Investment in the Future. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouma, H., Graafmans, J.A.M.: Gerontechnology. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinch, T.J., Bijker, W.E.: The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14, 399–441 (1984).  https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Latour, B.: Technology is society made durable. In: Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, pp. 103–131. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bijker, W.E.: Social construction of technology. In: Olsen, J.K.B., Pedersen, S.A., Hendricks, V.F. (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, pp. 88–94. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peine, A., Faulkner, A., Jæger, B., Moors, E.: Science, technology and the “grand challenge” of ageing: understanding the socio-material constitution of later life. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 93, 1–9 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Östlund, B., Olander, E., Jonsson, O., Frennert, S.: STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging: welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 93, 82–90 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E.: Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. Routledge, London (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agar, J.: Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone. Icon, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Telecommunication Union: World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database. ITU, Geneva (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castells, M., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Linchuan Qiu, J., Sey, A.: Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haddon, L.: Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Berg, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., Morley, D.: Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E. (eds.) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, pp. 15–31. Routledge, London (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loos, E., Haddon, L., Mante-Meijer, E. (eds.): Generational Use of New Media. Routledge, London (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haddon, L.: Domestication and mobile telephony. In: Katz, J.E. (ed.) Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology, pp. 43–56. Transaction, New Brunswick (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haddon, L.: Research questions for the evolving communications landscape. In: Ling, R.S., Pedersen, P. (eds.) Mobile Communications: Renegotiation of the Social Sphere, pp. 7–22. Springer, London (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-248-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haddon, L.: Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Can. J. Commun. 36, 311–323 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2011v36n2a2322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hartmann, M.: From domestication to mediated mobilism. Mob. Media Commun. 1, 42–49 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912464487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ito, M., Matsuda, M., Okabe, D. (eds.): Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katz, J.E., Aakhus, M.: Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk. Public Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., Brown, J.E.: Families without borders: mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology 42, 635–652 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508091620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Procter, R., Greenhalgh, T.: Designing technologies for social connection with older people. In: Prendergast, D., Garattini, C. (eds.) Aging and the Digital Life Course, pp. 107–124. Berghahn Books, New York (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foth, M., Hearn, G.: Networked individualism of urban residents: discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings. Inf. Commun. Soc. 10, 749–772 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petrovčič, A., Fortunati, L., Vehovar, V., Kavčič, M., Dolničar, V.: Mobile phone communication in social support networks of older adults in Slovenia. Telemat. Informatics. 32, 642–655 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joyce, K., Mamo, L.: Graying the cyborg: new directions in feminist analyses of aging, science, and technology. In: Calasanti, T.M., Slevin, K.F. (eds.) Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gilleard, C., Higgs, P.: Consumption and aging. In: Settersten, R.A., Angel, J.L. (eds.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging, pp. 361–375. Springer, New York (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7374-0_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loe, M.: Comfort and medical ambivalence in old age. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 93, 141–146 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Essén, A., Östlund, B.: Laggards as innovators? Old users as designers of new services & service systems. Int. J. Des. 5, 89–98 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peine, A., Rollwagen, I., Neven, L.: The rise of the “innosumer”: rethinking older technology users. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 82, 199–214 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Östlund, B.: Gammal är Äldst: En Studie av Teknikens Betydelse i Äldre Människors Liv [Older People are the Most Experienced: A Study of the Meaning of Technology in Older People’s Everyday Life] (1995). https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/4386c568-3b99-48b5-83a7-703093bc383a
  32. 32.
    Joyce, K., Loe, M.: Theorising technogenarians: a sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. In: Joyce, K., Loe, M. (eds.) Technogenarians: Studying Health and Illness Through an Ageing, Science, and Technology Lens, pp. 1–9. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bailey, C., Foran, T.G., Ni Scanaill, C., Dromey, B.: Older adults, falls and technologies for independent living: a life space approach. Ageing Soc. 31, 829–848 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Neven, L.: “But obviously not for me”: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol. Health Illn. 32, 335–347 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mort, M., Roberts, C., Callén, B.: Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol. Health Illn. 35, 799–812 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01530.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Morgans, A., Ozanne, E., Kulik, L.: Not for me: older adults choosing not to participate in a social isolation intervention. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016, pp. 745–757. ACM Press, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., Procter, R., Stones, R.: What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc. Sci. Med. 93, 86–94 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oudshoorn, N., Pinch, T.: How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Selwyn, N.: Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technol. Soc. 25, 99–116 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00062-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Peine, A., Neven, L.: From intervention to co-constitution: new directions in theorizing about aging and technology. Gerontologist. gny050 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schulz, R., Wahl, H.-W., Matthews, J.T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S.R., Czaja, S.J.: Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist 55, 724–734 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Peek, S.T.M., et al.: Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62, 226–237 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1159/000430949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mitzner, T.L., et al.: Technology adoption by older adults: findings from the PRISM trial. Gerontologist. gny113 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joyce, K., Peine, A., Neven, L., Kohlbacher, F.: Aging: the socio-material constitution of later life. In: Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C.A., Smith-Doerr, L. (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 915–942. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kvale, S.: InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Loos, E., Haddon, L., Mante-Meijer, E. (eds.): The Social Dynamics of Information and Communication Technology. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    López Gómez, D.: Little arrangements that matter: rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 93, 91–101 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Smartphones, apps and older people’s interests: from a generational perspective. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2016, pp. 491–503. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Marshall, B.L., Katz, S.: How old am I? Digital culture and quantified ageing. Digit. Cult. Soc. 2, 145–152 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Beneito-Montagut, R., Cassián-Yde, N., Begueria, A.: What do we know about the relationship between internet-mediated interaction and social isolation and loneliness in later life? Qual. Ageing Older Adults. 19, 14–30 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-03-2017-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cotterell, N., Buffel, T., Phillipson, C.: Preventing social isolation in older people. Maturitas 113, 80–84 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cornwell, B., Laumann, E.O., Schumm, L.P.: The social connectedness of older adults: a national profile. Am. Sociol. Rev. 73, 185–203 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T.B., Layton, J.B.: Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 7, e1000316 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Ozanne, E.: Building social connections: a framework for enriching older adults’ social connectedness through emerging information and communication technologies. In: Barbosa Neves, B., Vetere, F. (eds.) Ageing and Digital Technology: Designing and Evaluating Emerging Technologies for Older Adults, pp. 58–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2019)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    van Tilburg, T., van Groenou, M.B.: Network and health changes among older Dutch adults. J. Soc. Issues. 58, 697–713 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., Eagle, N.: Smartphones: an emerging tool for social scientists. Sociol. Methods Res. 37, 426–454 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108330005MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kitchin, R.: The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences. Sage, London (2014)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schäfer, M.T., van Es, K. (eds.): The Datafied Society: Studying Culture Through Data. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2017)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Schöning, J., Krüger, A., Bauer, G.: Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage. In: Bylund, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2011, pp. 47–56. ACM Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wagner, D.T., Rice, A., Beresford, A.R.: Device analyzer: understanding smartphone usage. In: Stojmenovic, I., Cheng, Z., Guo, S. (eds.) Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services 10th International Conference: MOBIQUITOUS 2013, pp. 195–208. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11569-6_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bentley, F., Church, K., Harrison, B., Lyons, K., Rafalow, M.: Three hours a day: understanding current teen practices of smartphone application use (2015)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Beyond WhatsApp: older people and smartphones. Rom. J. Commun. Public Relations. 18, 27 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Smartphone usage diversity among older people. In: Sayago, S. (ed.) Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction Research with Older People. HIS, pp. 51–66. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06076-3_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ferreira, D., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V., Barkhuus, L., Dey, A.K.: Contextual experience sampling of mobile application micro-usage. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, MobileHCI 2014, pp. 91–100. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Karikoski, J., Soikkeli, T.: Contextual usage patterns in smartphone communication services. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 491–502 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0503-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shin, C., Dey, A.K.: Automatically detecting problematic use of smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2013, pp. 335–344. ACM Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lee, U., et al.: Hooked on smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014, pp. 2327–2336. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rahmati, A., Tossell, C., Shepard, C., Kortum, P., Zhong, L.: Exploring iPhone usage. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2012, pp. 11–20. ACM Press, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15, 662–679 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kiukkonen, N., Blom, J., Dousse, O., Gatica-Perez, D., Laurila, J.: Towards rich mobile phone datasets: Lausanne data collection campaign. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Services, ICPS 2010. ACM Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Xu, R., Frey, R.M., Fleisch, E., Ilic, A.: Understanding the impact of personality traits on mobile app adoption - insights from a large-scale field study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 244–256 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Böhmer, M., Krüger, A.: A study on icon arrangement by smartphone users. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 2137–2146. ACM Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jones, S.L., Ferreira, D., Hosio, S., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V.: Revisitation analysis of smartphone app use. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2015, pp. 1197–1208. ACM Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Carrascal, J.P., Church, K.: An in-situ study of mobile app & mobile search interactions. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, pp. 2739–2748. ACM Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Holz, C., Bentley, F., Church, K., Patel, M.: “I’m just on my phone and they’re watching TV”: quantifying mobile device use while watching television. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, TVX 2015, pp. 93–102. ACM Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ferdous, R., Osmani, V., Mayora, O.: Smartphone app usage as a predictor of perceived stress levels at workplace. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth, pp. 225–228. ICST, Gent (2015)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Alvarez-Lozano, J., et al.: Tell me your apps and I will tell you your mood. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, PETRA 2014, pp. 1–7. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    de Montjoye, Y.-A., Quoidbach, J., Robic, F., Pentland, A.: Predicting personality using novel mobile phone-based metrics. In: Greenberg, A.M., Kennedy, W.G., Bos, N.D. (eds.) SBP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7812, pp. 48–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ikebe, Y., Katagiri, M., Takemura, H.: Friendship prediction using semi-supervised learning of latent features in smartphone usage data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, KDIR, vol. 1, pp. 199–205. SciTePress (2012)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Singh, V.K., Freeman, L., Lepri, B., Pentland, A.S.: Predicting spending behavior using socio-mobile features. In: International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Washington, D.C., USA, 8–14 September 2013, pp. 174–179. IEEE, Piscataway (2013)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Generational comparison of simultaneous internet activities using smartphones and computers. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9754, pp. 478–489. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39943-0_46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Götz, F.M., Stieger, S., Reips, U.-D.: Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality. PLoS ONE 12, e0176921 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ferreira, D., Dey, A.K., Kostakos, V.: Understanding human-smartphone concerns: a study of battery life. In: Lyons, K., Hightower, J., Huang, E.M. (eds.) Pervasive 2011. LNCS, vol. 6696, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21726-5_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Rosales, A.: My interests, my activities: learning from an intergenerational comparison of smartwatch use. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10298, pp. 114–129. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Ferran-Ferrer, N.: Long-term appropriation of smartwatches among a group of older people. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10926, pp. 135–148. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Comunello, F., Mulargia, S., Ferran-Ferrer, N.: Older people and smartwatches, initial experiences. El Prof. la Inf. 26, 457 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.may.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Alwin, D.F., McCammon, R.J.: Generations, cohorts, and social change. In: Mortimer, J.T., Shanahan, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of the Life Course, pp. 23–50. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bristow, J.: The Sociology of Generations: New Directions and Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Moen, P., Spencer, D.: Converging divergences in age, gender, health, and well-being. In: Binstock, R.H., George, L.K., Cutler, S.J., Hendricks, J., Schulz, J.H. (eds.) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, pp. 127–144. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gilleard, C., Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R., Blane, D.: Class, cohort, and consumption: the British experience of the third age. J. Gerontol. Ser. B. 60, S305–S310 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.6.S305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Anderson, M., Perrin, A.: Tech adoption climbs among older adults. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/
  92. 92.
    Eurostat: Individuals who accessed the internet in the last 12 months (isoc_ci_ifp_iu). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_ci_ifp_iu&lang=en
  93. 93.
    Statistics Canada: Life in the fast lane: how are Canadians managing? (2016). https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/171114/dq171114a-eng.htm
  94. 94.
    Eurostat: Individuals who used a mobile phone (or smart phone) to access the internet (isoc_ci_im_i). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_ci_im_i&lang=en
  95. 95.
    Statistics Canada: Use of technology by age group and sex, Canada, provinces and regions (table 22-10-0110-01). https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=2210011001
  96. 96.
    Lagerquist, J.: Internet usage growing fastest among older Canadians: StatsCan. https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/internet-usage-growing-fastest-among-older-canadians-statscan-1.3676986, (2017)
  97. 97.
    Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles (2014)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Jensen, M.: Challenges of privacy protection in big data analytics. In: BigData 2013, pp. 235–238 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/bigdata.congress.2013.39
  99. 99.
    Smith, M., Szongott, C., Henne, B., Von Voigt, G.: Big data privacy issues in public social media. In: 2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/dest.2012.6227909
  100. 100.
    Rody-Mantha, B.: Canada’s prolific smartphone market skews to iOS: study (2018). http://mediaincanada.com/2018/01/23/canadas-prolific-smartphone-market-skews-to-ios-study/
  101. 101.
    DeviceAtlas: Android v iOS market share 2019. https://deviceatlas.com/blog/android-v-ios-market-share
  102. 102.
    Statcounter: Mobile operating system market share worldwide: December 2017–December 2018. http://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Rosales
    • 1
  • Eugène Loos
    • 2
  • Alexander Peine
    • 3
  • Roser Beneito-Montagut
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Daniel Blanche
    • 1
  • Björn Fischer
    • 6
  • Stephen Katz
    • 7
  • Britt Östlund
    • 6
  1. 1.Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)Universitat Oberta de Catalunya/Open University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Utrecht University School of GovernanceUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Copernicus Institute of Sustainable DevelopmentUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Computer Science DepartmentUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya/Open University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.School of Social SciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  6. 6.Department for Biomedical Engineering and Health SystemsRoyal Institute of Technology, KTHStockholmSweden
  7. 7.Sociology DepartmentTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada

Personalised recommendations