Advertisement

Centring War’s “Side Effects”: The Institutionalisation of Conflict-Related Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in International Law and Its Translation into National Action Plans

  • Nicola PopovicEmail author
  • Anna Antonakis
Chapter

Abstract

Popovic and Antonakis outline the political and legal approaches to prevent and respond to conflict-related sexual violence in context. The two authors guide the reader through existing human rights law and humanitarian and international criminal law but also national implementation strategies. Based on a comparative analysis of existing national action plans on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, this chapter highlights entry points as well as good practices and lessons learned on how to address CRSV more effectively at the national and international level drawing from feminist scholarship in international relations and the concept of militarised masculinities. Therewith, Antonakis and Popovic combine feminist academic legal, social and political research with practical implementation efforts, looking back at the development and implementation of the women, peace and security agenda in the past two decades.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1998). Preface and introduction: Feminist longings and postcolonial conditions. In L. Abu-Lughod (Ed.), Remaking women: Feminism and modernity in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonakis, A. (2017). In transformation? Renegotiating gender and state feminism in Tunisia between 2011 and 2014: Power, positionalities and the public sphere. A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) To the Department of Political Science, the Otto-Suhr-Institut, of the Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Antonakis, A., & Popovic, N. (2018). Ein guter Plan in unsicheren Zeiten. UNSCR 1325 Nationale Aktionspläne im Vergleich. Mauerpark Institut. Retrieved December 16, 2018, from http://mauerparkinstitute.org/2018/04/22/ein-guter-plan-in-unsicheren-zeiten-1325-aktionsplane-im-vergleich/
  4. Askin, K. D. (1999). Sexual violence in decisions and indictments of the Yugoslav and Rwandan tribunals: Current status. International Journal of American Law, 93, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beetham, G., & Popovic, N. (2009). Putting policy into practice: Monitoring the implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820. Oslo: FOKUS Forum for Women and Development.Google Scholar
  6. Beijing Platform. (1995). Critical area E: Women and armed conflict.Google Scholar
  7. Braun, S. (2008). Frauen in die Mitte. Die UN-Resolution 1325. 2000. In E. Brabandt, B. Roß, & S. Zwingel (Eds.), Mehrheit am Rand? Geschlechterverhältnisse, globale Ungleichheit und transnationale Handlungsansätze (pp. 233–252). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Chinkin, C. (1994). Rape and sexual abuse of women in international law. European Journal of International Law, 5, 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chowdhury, R. (2002). Kadic v. Karadzic—Rape as a crime against women as a class. Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 20, 91–124.Google Scholar
  10. Civil Society Alternative Report. (2016). Women, peace, security reloaded. Bern: Civil Society Alternative Report.Google Scholar
  11. Cohn, C. (2004). Mainstreaming gender in UN security policy: A path to political transformation (Working Paper No. 204). Boston Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights.Google Scholar
  12. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. (2011). Violence against women. General Recommendation no. 19 (eleventh session). U.N. Document CEDAW/C/1992/L.1/Add.15, (CEDAW).Google Scholar
  13. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 8, 139–167.Google Scholar
  14. Dörmann, K. (2002). Elements of war crimes under the Rome statute of the international criminal court – Sources and commentary (p. 333). Cambridge: International Committee of the Red Cross, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Enloe, C. (1993). The morning after: Sexual politics at the end of the cold war. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Genovese, S. (2018). Prosecuting U.N. peacekeepers for sexual and gender-based violence in the Central African Republic. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 43, 609–637.Google Scholar
  18. Holland, S. L. (2009). The enigmatic Lynndie England: Gendered explanations for the crisis at Abu Ghraib. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6, 246–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hull, G. T., Bell-Scott, P., & Smith, B. (Eds.). (1982). All women are white, all blacks are male, but some of us are brave. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  20. ICRC. (2010). Protocol additional to the Geneva conventions of 12 August 1949.Google Scholar
  21. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. (1998). The prosector versus Jean-Paul Akayesu (Case No.ICTR-96-4-T). Retrieved December 17, 2018, from http://www.worldcourts.com/ictr/eng/decisions/1998.09.02_Prosecutor_v_Akayesu.pdf
  22. Lee-Koo, K., & Trojanowska, B. K. (2017). Does the United Nations’ Women, Peace and Security agenda speak with, for or to women in the Asia Pacific? The development of National Action Plans in the Asia Pacific. Critical Studies on Security, 5, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKenzie, M. (2010). Securitizing sex? Towards a theory of wartime sexual violence. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12, 202–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Menzel, A. (2018). Geld ist unser Hauptproblem! Kann Aufklärung gewalthaltige Geschlechterverhältnisse verändern? Wissenschaft und Frieden 3.Google Scholar
  25. Viseurs Sellers, P. (2018). (Re)Considering the gender jurisprudence of conflict. In F. N. Aoláin, N. Cahn, D. F. Haynes, & N. Valji (Eds.), Oxford handbook. Gender in armed conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Patten, P. (2018). Convergence between CEDAW and security council resolution 1325: Unlocking the potential of CEDAW as an important accountability tool for the women, peace and security agenda. In F. N. Aoláin, N. Cahn, D. F. Haynes, & N. Valji (Eds.), Oxford handbook. Gender in armed conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. PeaceWomen. (2018). WILPF’s Women, Peace and Security programme. Retrieved December 17, 2018, from http://www.peacewomen.org
  28. Popovic, N., Lyytikainen, M., & Barr, C. (2010). Planning for action on Women, Peace and Security. National level implementation of UNSCR 1325. New York: United Nations and International Alert.Google Scholar
  29. Pratt, N. (2016, January 25). How the west undermined women’s rights in the Arab world. Jadalyya. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/23693/how-the-west-undermined-women%E2%80%99s-rights-in-the-arab
  30. Prosecutor v. Dusco Tadic, Jurisdiction, Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, 10 August 1995; Prosecutor versus Dusco Tadic; Appeal on Jurisdiction, Case No. IT-94-1-AR 72, 2 October 1995. Retrieved December 17, 2018, from http://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/sites/www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/files/aldfiles/Prosecutor%20v%20Tadic%20%28IT-94-1-AR72%29%20ICTY.pdf
  31. Report of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court, Finalized draft text of the Elements of Crimes, PCNICC/2000/INF/3/Add.2, New York 12–30 June 2000, Elements of crimes, General introduction, No. 6. PCNICC/2000/1/Add.2.Google Scholar
  32. Schia, N., & de Carvalho, B. (2009). Nobody gets justice here! Addressing sexual and gender-based violence and rule of law in Liberia (NUPI Working Paper 761).Google Scholar
  33. Seifert, R. (1992). Krieg und Vergewaltigung-Ansätze zu einer Analyse. In A. Stiglmayer (Ed.), Massenvergewaltigung- Krieg gegen die Frauen: Die Frau in der Gesellschaft (pp. 85–108). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Smyth, C. (2001). Does the statute of the international criminal court deal adequately with the problem of sexual violence in armed conflicts? A Critique and recommendations for the future. Belfast: Queens University Belfast.Google Scholar
  35. Spivak, G. C. (2007). Feminism and human rights. In N. Shaikh (Ed.), The present as history: Critical perspectives on global power (pp. 172–201). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Theidon, K. (2018). 1325 + 15 = Reflections on the women, peace and security agenda. In F. N. Aoláin, N. Cahn, D. F. Haynes, & N. Valji (Eds.), Oxford handbook. Gender in armed conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Thornton, M. (1991, Winter). The public/private dichotomy: Gendered and discriminatory. Journal of Law and Society, 18(4), 448–463Google Scholar
  38. Tickner, J. A. (1996). Identity in international relations theory: Feminist perspectives. In Y. Lapid & F. Kratochwil (Eds.), The return of culture and identity in IR theory (pp. 147–162). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  39. UN Commission on Human Rights. (1993). Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Submitted by Mr. Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, Pursuant to Commission Resolution 1992/S-1/1 of 14 August 1992.Google Scholar
  40. UNHCR. (2018). Figures at a glance. Retrieved December 17, 2018, from http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html
  41. UNICEF. (2010). Handbook for coordinating gender-based violence interventions in humanitarian settings. Gender Based Violence Area of Responsibility Working Group. Retrieved December 17, 2018, from https://www.unicef.org/protection/files/GBV_Handbook_Long_Version.pdf
  42. UNICEF. (2014). Hidden in plain sight: A statistical analysis of violence against children. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  43. United Nations. (1949). Geneva convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in the times of war of 12 August 1949.Google Scholar
  44. Women Peacemakers Program (WPP). (2017). After 20 years, WPP closes its doors. Retrieved December 28, 2018, from http://www.peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/After%2020%20years,%20WPP%20closes%20its%20doors.pdf
  45. Zwingel, S. (2005). From intergovernmental negotiations to (sub)national change: A transnational perspective on the impact of CEDAW. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7, 400–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations