Advertisement

Visions of Swarming Robots: Artificial Intelligence and Stupidity in the Military-Industrial Projection of the Future of Warfare

  • Patrick CroganEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI book series (SOCUSRA)

Abstract

This chapter brings a philosophical perspective to a critical engagement with the analysis, speculation, and recommendations for the future development and deployment of lethal autonomous robotic systems such as they appear in reports, studies, and presentations emanating from the US military-industrial complex. In particular, Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology and how it relates to human cultural and political endeavors—including in the domain of military conflict—is brought to bear on projections of the development of artificially intelligent swarming in future war. The discussion focuses on the Center for a New American Security’s “Future of Warfare” research initiative because of its consolidation of the theoretical and logistical arguments for the adoption of swarming robotic elements in the application of military force. A critique of these efforts is made which argues that a problematic, voluntary stupidity animates these efforts to clear the way toward a much greater delegation of the exercise of lethal force to automated robotic systems.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1986. De Anima (On the Soul). Trans. Hugh Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Arquilla, John, and David Ronfeldt. 2000. Swarming and the Future of Conflict. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, Jo and Scott Shane. 2012. “Secret Kill List Proves Test of Obama’s Principles and Will.” New York Times, May 29. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?_r=1&hp#
  4. Chamayou, Gregoire. 2015. Drone Theory. Trans. Janet Lloyd. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Crogan, Patrick. 2017. “Videogames, War and Operational Aesthetics.” In War and Art: A Visual History of Modern Conflict, ed. Joanna Bourke, 324–329. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  6. De Landa, Manual. 1991. War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Defence. 2013. Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap: FY2013–2038. http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/DOD-USRM-2013.pdf
  8. Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenhower, Dwight D. 1961. Military-Industrial Complex Speech. Yale Law School Lillian Goldman Law Library. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/eisenhower001.asp. Accessed on 12 Dec 2017.
  10. Hayles, N. Katharine. 2016. “Cognitive Assemblages: Technical Agency and Human Interactions.” Critical Inquiry 43 (1): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Human Rights Watch. 2010. Open Letter to President Obama: Targeted Killings and Unmanned Combat Aircraft Systems (Drones). Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch. December 7. http://www.hrw.org/news/2010/12/07/letter-obama-targeted-killings
  12. Johnston, John. 2008. The Allure of Machinic Life: Cybernetics, Artificial Life, and the New AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, Kevin. 1994. Out of Control: The Rise of Neobiological Civilization. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Leroi-Gourhan, André. 1993. Gesture and Speech. Trans. Anna Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pickering, Andy. 1995. “Cyborg History and the World War II Regime.” Perspectives on Science: Historical, Philosophical, Social 3 (1): 1–48.Google Scholar
  16. Riza, M. Shane. 2013. Killing without Heart: Limits on Robotic Warfare in an Age of Persistent Conflict. Washington, DC: Potomac.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ross, Daniel. 2009. “Politics and Aesthetics, or, Transformations of Aristotle in Bernard Stiegler.” Transformation 17: 1–8.Google Scholar
  18. Scharre, Paul. 2014a. Eighth Annual Conference: Robotics on the Battlefield: The Coming Swarm. Center for a New America Security. Video Published 20 June 2014. https://youtu.be/_WuxwBHI6zY
  19. ———. 2014b. Robotics on the Battlefield – Part One: Range, Persistence and Daring. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/robotics-on-the-battlefield-part-i-range-persistence-and-daringGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2014c. Robotics on the Battlefield – Part Two: The Coming Swarm. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/report-preview-robotics-on-the-battlefield-part-ii-the-coming-swarmGoogle Scholar
  21. Stanford Law School (International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic) and New York University School of Law (Global Justice Clinic). 2012. Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. http://livingunderdrones.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf
  22. Stiegler, Bernard. 1998. Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2010. For a New Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2011a. Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. Stephen Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2011b. The Decadence of Industrial Democracies: Disbelief and Discredit, Volume 1. Trans. Daniel Ross and Suzanne Arnold. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2016. Automatic Society: The Future of Work, Volume 1. Trans. Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. United States Air Force Headquarters. 2009. U.S. Air Force’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems Flight Plan 2009–2047. http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/uas_2009.pdf
  28. ———. 2014. United States Air Force RPA [Remotely Piloted Aircraft] Vector: Vision and Enabling Concepts 2013–2048. http://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/news/USAFRPAVectorVisionandEnablingConcepts2013-2038.pdf
  29. Woods, Chris. 2012. “Analysis: Obama Embraced Redefinition of ‘Civilian’ in Drone Wars.” Bureau of Investigative Journalism, May 29. https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/opinion/2012-05-29/analysis-obama-embraced-redefinition-of-civilian-in-drone-wars

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations