Russia and China in Global Governance
Scholars studying Sino-Russian relations point at the informal division of labour between Russia and China in global governance. Russia remains active in international security governance, whereas China has increased the level of its participation in areas of economic, financial and environmental governance. These differences are ascribed to the different potential of both states as well as their related varied scope of interests in a well-functioning global governance system. However, this division of labour has evolved for the past couple of years. Beijing increased its engagement with international security governance, while Moscow lost some of its (already limited) interest in such areas as environmental or economic governance. This chapter aims at exploring this shift and its implications. Rather than analysing Sino-Russian relations in distinct areas of global governance, it proposes a different approach and identifies three patterns of interactions between the two countries: direct cooperation, parallel activities and contradictory/divergent activities.
KeywordsSino-Russian relations Global governance UN SCO BRICS
- Alden, Chris, et al., eds. 2017. China and Africa: Building Peace and Security Cooperation on the Continent. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bluhm, Richard, et al. 2018. Connective Financing: Chinese Infrastructure Projects and the Diffusion of Economic Activity in Developing Countries. AidData Working Paper, no. 64. http://docs.aiddata.org/ad4/pdfs/WPS64_Connective_Financing_Chinese_Infrastructure_Projects_and_the_Diffusion_of_Economic_Activity_in_Developing_Countries.pdf
- Channel News Asia. 2019. China Rebuffs Germany’s Call for US Missile Deal with Russia. February 17. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/china-rebuffs-germany-s-call-for-us-missile-deal-with-russia-11250882
- CNBC. 2018. Russia, China Abstain in UN Vote on Syria Cross-Border Aid. December 13. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/14/russia-china-abstain-in-un-vote-on-syria-cross-border-aid.html
- Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette. 2016. Power and Purpose in Transgovernmental Networks: Insights from the Global Nonproliferation Regime. In The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance, ed. Deborah Avant and Oliver Westerwinter, 131–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farnsworth, Timothy. 2011. China and Russia Submit Cyber Proposal. Arms Control Today 41 (9): 35–36. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011_11/China_and_Russia_Submit_Cyber_Proposal.
- Fook, Lye L. 2017. China and Global Governance: A More Active Role on a Selective Basis. China: An International Journal 15 (1): 214–233.Google Scholar
- Godement, Francois. 2015. China: Taking Stock Before the Paris Conference. European Council on Foreign Relations (September). https://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/CA_1509_Climate.pdf.
- Godement, Francois, et al. 2018. The United Nations of China: A Vision of the World Order. European Council on Foreign Relations (April). http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/the_united_nations_of_china_a_vision_of_the_world_order.pdf.
- Grant, Charles. 2012. Russia, China and Global Governance. London: Centre for European Reform. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Grant_CER_Eng.pdf.Google Scholar
- Japan Times. 2018. U.N. Security Council Considers Move to Push Myanmar on Rohingya Crisis, but Russia and China Boycott Talks. December 18. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/12/18/asia-pacific/u-n-security-council-considers-move-push-myanmar-rohingya-crisis-russia-china-boycott-talks#.XG1-ZugzbIV.
- Kennedy, Scott, ed. 2017. Global Governance and China: The Dragon’s Learning Curve. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kirton, John, and Marina Larionova, eds. 2018. BRICS and Global Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2014. Concept of the Russian Federation’s State Policy in the Area of International Development Assistance. April 20. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/64542.
- Ministry of National Defense. 2019. Chinese Naval Fleets Escort 3,400 Foreign Ships over Past 10 Years. January 1. http://eng.mod.gov.cn/news/2019-01/02/content_4833368.htm.
- News 24. 2018. C. Africa Rebels Rearm After Military Gets Russia Weapons: UN Panel. August 1. https://www.news24.com/Africa/News/c-africa-rebels-rearm-after-military-gets-russia-weapons-un-panel-20180801.
- Reuters. 2019. Shuttered at Home, Cement Plants Bloom Along China’s New Silk Road. January 31. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-silkroad-cement-insight/shuttered-at-home-cement-plants-bloom-along-chinas-new-silk-road-idUSKCN1PO35T.
- RFERL. 2017. China, Russia Block UN Statement on Myanmar Violence, Diplomats Say. March 17. https://www.rferl.org/a/china-russia-united-nations-myanmar-rakhine-rohingya/28376375.html.
- Rodkiewicz, Witold. 2018. China’s Junior Partner: Russia’s Korean Policy. Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies. https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/PW_72_China%E2%80%99s%20junior%20partner_net.pdf.Google Scholar
- Schwirtz, Michael. 2018. Anguish at U.N., but No Action Plan, for Rohingya Atrocities. The New York Times, August 28. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/28/world/asia/un-rohingya-myanmar-blanchett.html.
- Solanko, Laura. 2016. Opening Up or Closing the Door for Foreign Trade: Russia and China Compared. BOFIT Policy Brief, no. 8. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/14372/bpb0816.pdf?sequence=1.
- The Guardian. 2017. China and Russia Oppose UN Resolution on Rohingya. December 24. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/24/china-russia-oppose-un-resolution-myanmar-rohingya-muslims.
- Umbach, Frank. 2019. China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Its Energy-Security Dimensions. RSIS Working Paper, no. 320. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/WP320.pdf.
- Xinhuanet. 2019. Xi’s Article on Building Ecological Civilization to Be Published. January 31. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/31/c_137790087.htm.
- Zaytsev, Y., and A. Knobel. 2017. Ekonomicheskaya pomoshch Rossii drugim stranam v 2016 godu. Monitoring Ekonomicheskoi Situatsii v Rossii 17 (55): 14–18.Google Scholar