From the “Belfie” to the Death-of-Me: The Affective Archive of the Self/ie

  • Misha KavkaEmail author


The selfie is the newest and arguably most radical phenomenon in the long-standing tradition of photographic portraiture. Driven by changes in both technological and social contexts, the selfie is central to the ongoing transition from written to image-based communication and has been accompanied by the reconfiguration of identity into a self-curated visual archive. This chapter argues that this is an act of affective curation, re-describing Roland Barthes’s notion of the photographic punctum in terms of the multi-faceted, ambivalent ontology of selfies. With particular attention to sexualised photos and death-by-selfie, the chapter interrogates selfies in relation to the Deleuzian assemblage, the Lacanian gaze and the Freudian death drive in order to understand the role of the self/ie archive in relation to digital identity.


  1. “selfie, n.”. 2018, December. OED Online. Oxford University Press. Accessed December 26, 2018.
  2. Abidin, Crystal. 2016. Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media & Society 2 (2): 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Albury, Kath. 2015. Selfies, Sexts and Sneaky Hats: Young People’s Understandings of Gendered Practices of Self-Representation. International Journal of Communication 9: 1734–1745.Google Scholar
  4. Bansal, Agam, et al. 2018. Selfies: A Boon or Bane? Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 7 (4): 828–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthes, Roland. (1980) 2000. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Trans. Richard Howard. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  6. Bucher, Tania, and Anne Helmond. 2018. The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In The Sage Handbook of Social Media, ed. Jean Burgess, Alice Marwick, and Thomas Poell, 233–253. London: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dean, Jodi. 2010. Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of the Drive. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. (1980) 2008. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. van Dijck, José. 2008. Digital Photography: Communication, Identity, Memory. Visual Communication 7 (1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egan, R. Danielle. 2013. Becoming Sexual: A Critical Appraisal of the Sexualisation of Girls. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Flusser, Vilém. (1983) 2000. Towards a Philosophy of Photography. Trans. Anthony Mathews. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, Sigmund. (1920) 1995. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. In The Freud Reader, ed. by Peter Gay, 594–626. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  14. Gye, Lisa. 2007. Picture This: The Impact of Mobile Camera Phones on Personal Photographic Practices. Continuum 21 (2): 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess, Aaron. 2015. The Selfie Assemblage. International Journal of Communication 9: 1629–1646.Google Scholar
  16. Hjorth, Larissa, and Natalie Hendry. 2015, April. A Snapshot of Social Media: Camera Phone Practices. Social Media + Society 1: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kardashian, Kim. 2013. #NoFilter. Instagram, October 17.
  18. Kardashian West, Kim. 2015. Selfish. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Kuntsman, Adi, ed. 2017. Selfie Citizenship. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Lacan, Jacques. (1973) 1979. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis. Trans. Alan Sheridan. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  21. Madonna. 1992. Sex. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  22. Marwick, Alice E. 2015. Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture 27 (1): 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCormick, Erin, and Michael Safi. 2018. Is Our Life Just Worth a Photo?: The Tragic Death of a Couple in Yosemite. The Guardian, November 3.
  24. Moorthy, Meenakshi. 2018. Chasing Sunsets or Chasing Likes? Instagram, March 28. Accessed December 26, 2018.
  25. Pink, Sarah, and Larissa Hjorth. 2012. Emplaced Cartographies: Reconceptualising Camera-Phone Practices in an Age of Locative Media. Media International Australia 145: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Renold, Emma, and Jessica Ringrose. 2017. Selfies, Relfies and Phallic Tagging: Posthuman Part-icipations in Teen Digital Sexuality Assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (11): 1066–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rettberg, Jill Walker. 2014. Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ringrose, Jessica. 2013. Postfeminist Education? Girls and the Sexual Politics of Schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Routh, Patricia. 2016. The Politics of Transformation: Selfie Production of the Visually Marginalised. In The Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere, ed. Athina Karatzogianni, Dennis Nguyen, and Elisa Serafinelli, 363–381. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwarz, Ori. 2010. On Friendship, Boobs, and the Logic of the Catalogue: Online Self-Portraits as a Means for the Exchange of Capital. Convergence 16 (2): 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silverman, Kaja. 1989. Fassbinder and Lacan: A Reconsideration of Gaze, Look, and Image. Camera Obscura 7 (1 (19)): 54–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warfield, Katie. 2017. MirrorCameraRoom: The Gendered Multi-(in)stabilities of the Selfie. Feminist Media Studies 17 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watkins, Megan. 2010. Desiring Recognition, Accumulating Affect. In The Affect Theory Reader, ed. Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 269–285. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wikipedia. n.d. List of Selfie-Related Injuries and Deaths. Accessed December 26, 2018.
  35. Wise, J. Macgregor. 2011. Assemblage. In Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts, ed. Charles J. Stivale, 2nd ed., 91–102. Durham, UK: Acumen.Google Scholar
  36. Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The Parallax View. London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations