Mobile Reception: Materiality and Locality with Small Screens

  • Bettina FrankhamEmail author
  • Chris Caines


Mobile phone screens have always been intimate displays. Attached to uniquely personal devices that rarely leave one’s side and linked to networks that carry one’s most intimate communications these screens provide a boutique set of opportunities and challenges for screen-based production. This chapter examines these affordances and restrictions with particular focus on what sets these mobile screens apart from other screens as sites of reception, production and distribution. It particularly focuses on the materialities of the devices, the key aspects of the locative and the nature of mobile devices as networked screens. It draws on exemplars from mobile-based media art productions that have made sophisticated use of these properties in ways that distinguish mobile screen work as a modality with its own language, aesthetic rules and creative production strategies. In these examples the chapter looks at how media artists are continuing a tradition of experimentation with the materiality of new mediums and how this contributes to developing the language of the medium. It examines how the particular properties of the mobile screen influence the type of content that is produced, from the nature of stories that sit well in the medium to the types of physical and virtual interaction that distinguish these screens from other networked screens.


  1. Adams, M. (2015). How We Made Experiential Life-Coaching App, Karen. Guardian (Culture professionals network), Fri 14 Aug 2015 21.40 AEST. Viewed 20 May 2018
  2. Apple. (2017). App Store Preview – Karen by Blast Theory. Ratings and Reviews. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  3. Barns, S. (2014). A Wrinkle in Time, a City of Forking Paths. Viewed 20 Sept 2018
  4. Berry, M. (2017). Creating with Mobile Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blast Theory. (2015a). Karen. Google Play.Google Scholar
  6. Blast Theory. (2015b). Karen (Projects). Viewed 10 May 2018,
  7. Blast Theory (2018, August 31). Karen Data Report. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  8. Brueck, H. (2018, March 12). This Is What Your Smartphone Is Doing to Your Brain – And It Isn’t Good. Business Insider Australia. Viewed 10 May 2018
  9. Bunt, B. (2013, January 16). Participation/Mediation, brogan bunt, vol. 2018. Viewed 20 June 2018
  10. Cardiff, J., & Miller, G. B. (2014). The City of Forking Paths. 19th Biennale of Sydney.Google Scholar
  11. Cardiff, J., & Schaub, M. (2005). Janet Cardiff: The Walk Book. Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary (Vienna).Google Scholar
  12. Casemajor, N. (2015). Digital Materialisms: Frameworks for Digital Media Studies. Westminster Papers in Culture and Communication, 10(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drumm, J., White, N., Swiegers, M., & Davey, M. (2017). Smart Everything, Everywhere: Mobile Consumer Survey 2017 (The Australian cut), Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Farman, J. (Ed.). (2016). Foundations of Mobile Media Studies: Essential Texts on the Formation of a Field. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Google Play Store. (2018). Play Store - Karen by Blast Theory, Series Play Store - Karen by Blast Theory App store. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  17. Heyward, M. (2014). Notes for Walking an Augmented Landscape: Spatial Narrative, Walked Practices and Locative Technologies. PhD thesis, University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Ito, M. (2005). Introduction. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Janet Cardiff’s Audio Walks. (2011). Fabrica: Brighton Centre for Contemporary Art. Viewed 20 Sept 2018
  20. Mee, E. B. (2016). The Audience Is the Message: Blast Theory’s App-Drama Karen. TDR: The Drama Review, 60(3), 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Okada, T. (2005). Youth Culture and the Shaping of Japanese Mobile Media: Personalization and the Ketai Internet as Multimedia. In M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life (pp. 41–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pink, S., Sinanan, J., Hjorth, L., & Horst, H. (2015). Tactile Digital Ethnography: Researching Mobile Media Through the Hand. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(2), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turney, E. (2015). App Close and Personal: Meet Karen, She Wants Your Data. BBC. Viewed 6 May 2018

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations