Characterizing Organizational Micro-climates in Structural Groups

  • Geoffrey P. MorganEmail author
  • Kathleen M. Carley
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11549)


We use text to characterize micro-climates in a specific organizational context. We use Louvain clustering to create trees, and identify communities and smaller groups, which we call leaves. In comparing these structural groups, we see that most structural groups within this organization share locations and organizational functions. Our analyses show that location, gender, and minority status dominance tend to increase the strength of the textual distinction of the found structural groups.


Organizational climate Organization Micro-climates Structural analysis Text analysis 


  1. 1.
    Hoy, W.K.: Organizational climate and culture: a conceptual analysis of the school workplace. J. Educ. Psychol. Consult. 1(2), 149–168 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orne, M.T.: On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am. Psychol. 17, 776 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. 2008, P10008 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton, R.M., Obel, B., DeSanctis, G.: Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewin, K.: Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods. Am. J. Sociol. 44, 868–896 (1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewin, K.: Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Brothers, New York (1951)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zohar, D., Luria, G.: A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. J. Appl. Psychol. 90, 616 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brondino, M., Silva, S.A., Pasini, M.: Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: co-workers as the missing link. Saf. Sci. 50, 1847–1856 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodrigues, M.A., Arezes, P.M., Leão, C.P.: Multilevel model of safety climate for furniture industries. Work 51, 557–570 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erhrhart, M.G., Schneider, B., Macey, W.H.: Organizational Climate and Culture: An Introduction to Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., Wolf, G.: Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psychol. 69, 85 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    George, J.M., James, L.R.: Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 798–804 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LeBreton, J.M., Senter, J.L.: Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11, 815–852 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keyton, J.: Communication and Organizational Culture: A Key to Understanding Work Experiences. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keyton, J.: Organizational Culture: Creating Meaning and Influence. In: Putnam, L.L., Mumby, D.K. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schneider, B., Reichers, A.E.: On the etiology of climates. Pers. Psychol. 36, 19–39 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glick, W.H.: Response: Organizations are not central tendencies: shadowboxing in the dark, round 2. Acad. Manag. Rev. 13, 133–137 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider, B.: Organizational behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 36, 573–611 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brandes, U., Robins, G., McCranie, A., Wasserman, S.: What is network science? Netw. Sci. 1, 1–15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carley, K.M., Pfeffer, J., Reminga, J., Storrick, J., Columbus, D.: ORA User’s Guide 2013. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Serpe, R.T., Stryker, S.: The construction of self and reconstruction of social relationships. Adv. Group Process. 4, 41–66 (1987)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stryker, S.: Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park (1980)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sparck Jones, K.: A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J. Doc. 28, 11–21 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tietze, S., Cohen, L., Musson, G.: Understanding Organizations Through Language. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations