UX Challenges in GDSS: An Experience Report
In this paper we present a user experience report on a Group Decision Support System. The used system is a Collaborative framework called GRoUp Support (GRUS). The experience consists in three user tests conducted in three different countries. While the locations are different, all three tests were run in the same conditions: same facilitator and tested process. In order to support the end-users. we teach the system in two different ways: a presentation of the system, and a video demonstrating how to use it. The main feedback of this experience is that the teaching step for using Collaborative tools in mandatory. The experience was conducted in the context of decision-making in the agriculture domain.
KeywordsGDSS User experience
Authors of this publication acknowledge the contribution of the Project 691249, RUC-APS: Enhancing and implementing Knowledge based ICT solutions within high Risk and Uncertain Conditions for Agriculture Production Systems (www.ruc-aps.eu), funded by the European Union under their funding scheme H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015.
This work is partially supported by the project ANR-17-CE04-0012 VGI4bio.
- 2.Sprague, R.H., Carlson, E.: Building Effective Decision Support Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1982)Google Scholar
- 3.Camilleri, G., Zaraté, P.: How to avoid conflict in group decision making: a multicriteria approach. In: Handbook GDN. Springer (2018, in preparation)Google Scholar
- 4.Grigera, J., Garrido, A., Rossi, G.: Kobold: web usability as a service. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. IEEE Press (2017)Google Scholar
- 6.Rossi, V., Caffi, T., Salinari, F.: Helping farmers face the increasing complexity of decision-making for crop protection. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 51(3), 457–479 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Grigera, J., Garrido, A., Zaraté, P., Camilleri, G., Fernández, A.: A mixed usability evaluation on a multi criteria group decision support system in agriculture. In: Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, p. 36. ACM, New York (2018)Google Scholar
- 8.Sutcliffe, A.G., Ryan, M.: Experience with SCRAM, a scenario requirements analysis method. In: Proceedings of IEEE Third International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 164–171 (1998)Google Scholar
- 9.Sutcliffe, A.: Scenario-based requirements engineering. In: 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 320–329 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Røkke, J.M., Dresser-Rand, A.S., Muller, G., Pennotti, M.: Requirement Elicitation and Validation by Prototyping and Demonstrators (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Maguire, M., Kirakowski, J., Vereker, N.: RESPECT: User Centred Requirements Handbook (1998)Google Scholar
- 13.Schwarz, R.: The Skilled Facilitator. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
- 14.de Vreede, G.J.: Achieving repeatable team performance through collaboration engineering: experiences in two case studies. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. Exe. 13(2), 115–129 (2014)Google Scholar
- 17.de Vreede, G.-J., Briggs, R.O.: Collaboration engineering: reflections on 15 years of research & practice. In: HICSS (2018)Google Scholar
- 19.Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. J. Manag. IS 15(3), 7–149 (1998)Google Scholar
- 22.Johnson-Lenz, P., Johnson-Lenz, T.: Groupware: the process and impacts of design choices. Computer-Mediated Communication Systems: Status and Evaluation (1982). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Grabisch, M., Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M. (eds.): Fuzzy Measures and Integrals-Theory and Applications, pp. 348–374. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar