Advertisement

Distrust of Commerce and Commercialism

  • Hans Abbing
Chapter

Abstract

During the period of serious art (circa 1880–1980), art and money represent hostile spheres. The art ethos is a-commercial. This was not the case in earlier centuries. In this period artists and art-companies attach much value to autonomy and the making of “own work”. They are easily accused of compromising and being commercial. They anyway are inclined to internally subsidize their autonomous work, often by means of second jobs. Also marketing, cultural entrepreneurship and branding are taboo. I, however, demonstrate that also in this period artist and art-companies are influenced by consumer demand in their artistic choices. After circa 1980, there is a process of recommercialization. Now the demands of not only consumers and governments but also of major donors and sponsors affect art production.

Without admitting this in the twenty-first century, art-companies, and in a lesser degree artists, care less about autonomy and autonomous work, while marketing, cultural entrepreneurship and branding have become acceptable. In this context, I pay attention to the enrichment of artworks through different “wrapping” and marketing. This contributes to a strong winner-take-all mechanism in the arts. Prices of some visual artworks are now very high, while some art-lovers pay high prices to participate in “excellent” performances.

One wonders if these developments lead to less diversity, standardization and trivialization in the serious arts as are thought to exist in commercial popular music ever since the 1960s. The latter is anyway not true.

Literature

  1. Abbing, H. (2002). Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, M. (1985). Stardom and Talent. American Economic Review, 75, 208–212.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1991). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. In T. W. Adorno & J. M. Bernstein (Eds.), The Culture Industry. Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Arian, E. (1971). Bach, Beethoven, and Bureaucracy: The Case of the Philadelphia Orchestra (1st ed.). Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arora, P., & Vermeylen, F. (2013). The End of the Art Connoisseur? Experts and Knowledge Production in the Visual Arts in the Digital Age. Information, Communication & Society, 16(2), 194–214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.687392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beech, D. (2015). Art and Value: Art’s Economic Exceptionalism in Classical, Neoclassical and Marxist Economics. Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanning, T. C. W. (2008). The Triumph of Music. The Rise of Composers, Musicians and Their Art. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bohme, G. (2017). Critique of Aesthetic Capitalism. Milano/Udine: Mimesis International.Google Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London/New York: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boltanski, L., & Esquerre, A. (2016). The Economic Life of Things. New Left Review, 98, 31–54.Google Scholar
  11. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). On Justification. Economies of Worth. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1983). The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed. Poetics, 25, 311–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Cowen, T. (1998). In Praise of Commercial Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (2013). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963). Mansfield Centre: Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar
  16. Dekker, E. (2015). Two Approaches to Study the Value of Art and Culture, and the Emergence of a Third. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowd, T. J. (2004). Musical Diversity and the U.S. Mainstream Recording Market, 1955–1990. ResearchGate, 82(4), 1411–1455.Google Scholar
  18. Finkelstein, D., & MacCleery, A. (2005). An Introduction to Book History. New York etc.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The Winner-Take-All Society. New York etc.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gogh, V. V. (2003). The Letters of Vincent Van Gogh. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Grampp, W. D. (1989). Pricing the Priceless. Art, Artists and Economics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Hafferty, F. W., & Castellani, B. (2011). Two Ships: The Rise of a Professionalism Movement Within Modern Medicine and Medical Sociology’s Disappearance from the Professionalism Debate. In Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing (pp. 201–219). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haines, R. E. (1982). The Inner Eye of Alfred Stieglitz. Lanham: University Press of America, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  24. Hauser, A. (1999). The Social History of Art (1st ed.). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Klamer, A. (1996). The Value of Culture. In A. Klamer (Ed.), The Value of Culture. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Klamer, A. (2011). Cultural Entrepreneurship. Review of Austrian Economics, 24, 121–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klamer, A. (2016). Doing the Right Thing. A Value Based Economy. London: Ubiquity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Klamer, A., Langeveld, C., & Teule, P. (n.d.). Pak aan. Retrieved from http://www.klamer.nl/book/pak-aan/
  29. Laermans, R. (2009). Artistic Autonomy as Value and Practice. In P. Gielen & P. de Bruyne (Eds.), Being an Artist in Post-Fordist Times (pp. 125–137). Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Menger, P.-M. (2001). Artists as Workers: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Poetics, 28(4), 241–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(01)80002-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Negus, K. (1999). Music Genres and Corporate Cultures. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Peterson, R., & Berger, D. (1975). Cycles in Symbol Production: The Case of Popular Music. American Sociological Review, 40(6), 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rengers, M. (2002). Economic Lives of Artists. Economic Lives of Artists: Studies into Careers and the Labour Market in the Cultural Sector. Doctoral Thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  34. Rosen, S. (1981). The Economics of Superstars. American Economic Review, 71, 845–858.Google Scholar
  35. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674879904
  36. Steptoe, A. (1988). The Mozart-DaPonte Operas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Stigler, G. J. (1945). Review of Review of The Economics of Control: Principles of Welfare Economics, by A. P. Lerner. Political Science Quarterly, 60(1), 113–115.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2144462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thayer, A. W. (1964). Thayer’s Life of Beethoven (New ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Throsby, D. (1994). A Work-Preference Model of Artist Behaviour. In A. Peacock & I. Rizzo (Eds.), Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies. Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Velthuis, O. (2002). Talking Prices. Contemporary Art on the Market in Amsterdam and New York. Unpublished Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  41. Velthuis, O. (2005a). Imaginary Economics. Contemporary Artists and the World of Big Money. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  42. Velthuis, O. (2005b). Talking Prices. Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Velthuis, O. (2012). Introduction. The Contemporary Art Market Between Stasis and Flux. In Contemporary Art and Its Commercial Markets: A Report on Current Conditions and Future Scenarios. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  44. Velthuis, O. (2016). Are We in a New Era of the Art Market? In Art in the Periphery of the Center (pp. 456–465). Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  45. Winkel, C. V., Gielen, P. J. D., & Zwaan, K. (2012). De hybride kunstenaar. De organisatie van de artistieke praktijk in het postindustriële tijdperk. Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/de-hybride-kunstenaar-de-organisatie-van-de-artistieke-praktijk-in-het-postindustriele-tijdperk(e173c13d-c532-415c-89fb-710088a86f8d)/export.html
  46. Wuggenig, U., & Rudolph, S. (2013). Valuation Beyond the Market. On Symbolic Value and Economic Value in Contemporary Art. In Art Production Beyond the Art Market (pp. 100–149). Retrieved from http://www.sternberg-press.com/?pageId=1465
  47. Zelizer, V. A. (1994). The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  48. Zuidhof, P.-W. (2003). Beyond the Polemics on the Market. Presented at the Paper Presented at the Eastern Sociological Society Conference.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Abbing
    • 1
  1. 1.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations