Advertisement

Exclusion

  • Hans Abbing
Chapter

Abstract

Serious art is not for everybody and not by everybody. In the halls, theatres and museums, lower-class people and non-White people were and are much underrepresented. This also applies to artists. Underrepresentation is far less extreme in popular art. In the production of serious art, also creative women artists were and sometimes still are underrepresented. In the chapter, I discuss several mechanisms of deliberate or de facto exclusion of “others”. Price exclusion and informal exclusion are most important.

In the period of serious art (circa 1880 till 1980), groups of, usually leftist, art-lovers attempt to share art with other social groups, but these attempts are unsuccessful.

Exclusivity of art is important in the arts. Moreover, being member of an own group of art-lovers is attractive and many art-lovers are willing to pay for this. This phenomenon occurs at all levels of art consumption, from the participants in a theatre performance of classical music to the small groups of people owning artworks costing millions.

Literature

  1. Adams, R. B., Kräussl, R., Navone, M. A., & Verwijmeren, P. (2017). Is Gender in the Eye of the Beholder? Identifying Cultural Attitudes with Art Auction Prices (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3083500). Retrieved from Social Science Research Network Website: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3083500
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arian, E. (1971). Bach, Beethoven, and Bureaucracy: The Case of the Philadelphia Orchestra (1st ed.). Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baumann, S. (2001). Intellectualization and Art World Development: Film in the United States. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 404–426.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3088886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production : Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Bryson, B. (1996). ‘Anything But Heavy Metal’: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61, 884–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clapper, M. (2002). “I Was Once a Barefoot Boy!”: Cultural Tensions in a Popular Chromo. American Art, 16, 16–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, R. (2005). Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cowen, T. (2002). Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World’s Cultures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danto, A. C. (1986). The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Works of Art. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dimaggio, P., & Useem, M. (1978). Social Class and Arts Consumption: The Origins and Consequences of Class Differences in Exposure to the Arts in America. Theory and Society, 5, 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dulken, H. v. (1988). In Ons Diaconale Land. Amsterdam: Boekmanstichting/Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  14. Elias, N. (1994). The Civilizing Process (p. 1993). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The Winner-Take-all Society. New York etc.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heinich, N. (2005). L’Élite Artiste, Excellence et Singularité en Régime Démocratique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  17. Jahoda, S. (2014). Artists Report Back, A National Study on the Lives of Arts Graduates and Working Artists. Retrieved from BFAMFAPhD Website: http://bfamfaphd.com/
  18. Levine, L. W. (1988). Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Original, Copy, Fake, On the Significance of the Object in History and Archaeology Museums. (2010). 22nd ICOM General Conference. Presented at the Shanghai, Shanghai.Google Scholar
  20. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674879904
  21. Swaan, A. d. (1986). Kwaliteit is Klasse. De Sociale Wording en Werking van het Cultureel Smaakverschil. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, C. (1991). The Malaise of Modernity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. In 1192 the book was reprinted under the title The Ethics of Authenticity.Google Scholar
  23. Veld-Langeveld, H. M. (1961). De sociale cultuurspreiding. In A. H. J. den Hollander, E. Hofstee, & J. A. A. van Doorn (Eds.), Drift en Koers. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  24. Velthuis, O. (2005). Talking Prices. Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Weber, M., & Owen, D. S. (2004). The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Wouters, C. (2007). Informalization, Manners and Emotions Since 1890. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Abbing
    • 1
  1. 1.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations