Advertisement

Brazil’s (Frustrated) Quest for Higher Status

  • Benjamin de CarvalhoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Emerging powers have been emerging for quite some time now, yet seldom risen to great power status. This state of affairs is such that the emerging powers have not only institutionalized their ‘emerging’ status though institutionalized cooperation, but this cooperation has been steadily going on for over a decade: what started as an acronym (BRIC) turned into a grouping of states (Brazil, Russia, India, China) before another so-called emerging power was added to the group, changing again the acronym into BRICS in order to accommodate the ‘South’ in South Africa.

References

  1. Bodnam, Samuel W., James D. Wolfensohn, and Julia Sweig. 2011. Global Brazil and U.S.-Brazil Relations. Independent Task Force Report No. 66. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  2. Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study in World Politics. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burges, Sean W. 2013. Brazil as a Bridge Between Old and New Powers? International Affairs 89 (3): 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Carvalho, Benjamin. 2011. Brasil: Endelig en stormakt? Internasjonal Politikk 69 (2): 293–300.Google Scholar
  6. de Carvalho, Benjamin, and Jon Harald Sande Lie. 2015. A Great Power Performance: Norway, Status and the Policy of Involvement. In Small State Status Seeking, ed. Benjamin de Carvalho and Iver B. Neumann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. de Carvalho, Benjamin, and Iver B. Neumann, eds. 2015. Small State Status Seeking: Norway’s Quest for International Standing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Domingos, Nicole de Paula and Benjamin de Carvalho. 2012. Belated Courtship? The Uneasy Partnership between Brazil and the EU. Policy Brief 12/2012. Oslo: NUPI.Google Scholar
  9. Duque, Marina G. 2018. Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach. International Studies Quarterly 62 (3): 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esteves, Paulo. 2011. “Ikke-likegyldighet” i brasiliansk utenrikspolitikk. Internasjonal Politikk 2: 282–292.Google Scholar
  11. Hart, Andrew F., and Bruce D. Jones. 2011. How Do Rising Powers Rise? Survival 52 (6): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Malamud, A. 2011. Brasil: Fra Regionale nederlag til Global fremvekst. Internasjonal Politikk 69 (2): 242–253.Google Scholar
  13. Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Modelski, George. 1972. Principles of World Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Neumann, Iver B., and Benjamin de Carvalho. 2015. Introduction: Small States and Status. In Small State Status Seeking, ed. Benjamin de Carvalho and Iver B. Neumann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Onuf, Nicholas G. 2012. World of Our Making. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Røren, Pål, and Paul D. Beaumont. 2018. Grading Greatness: Evaluating the Status Performance of the BRICS. Third World Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1535892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sotero, P., and L.E. Armjio. 2007. Brazil: To Be or Not to Be a BRIC? Asian Perspective 31 (4): 4370–4391.Google Scholar
  19. Spektor, M. 2012. Humanitarian Interventionism Brazilian Style? Americas Quarterly 2012 (Summer): 54–59.Google Scholar
  20. Tank, P. 2012. The Concept of ‘Rising Powers’. NOREF Policy Brief, June 2012.Google Scholar
  21. Vigevani, Tullo, and Gabriel Cepaluni. 2010. Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing Times: The Quest for Autonomy From Sarney to Lula. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  22. Wohlforth, William C. 2009. Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War. World Politics 61 (1): 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wohlforth, William C., Benjamin de Carvalho, Halvard Leira, and Iver B. Neumann. 2018. Moral Authority and Status in International Relations: Good States and the Social Dimension of Status Seeking. Review of International Studies 44 (3): 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zarakol, Ayse. 2010. After Defeat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI)OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations