English as a Medium of Instruction: What about Pragmatic Competence?
This chapter focuses on the importance of teaching pragmatic competence in English as a medium of instruction. In order to identify if teachers who use English as a medium of instruction use pragmatic strategies when explaining the key points of their subjects, 50 learning objects (digital recordings) were compiled and the English language used by teachers analysed. Some metadiscoursal strategies such as the use of hedges and boosters were identified and classified. A quantitative analysis as well as a qualitative analysis was carried out to identify if teachers used pragmatic strategies in their presentations and, from those results, some strategies that may be used by teachers involved in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) to improve pragmatic competence were described in detail.
KeywordsPragmatic competence Learning objects Hedges Boosters
- Barnard, R., & McLellan, J. (Eds.). (2013). Codeswitching in university English-medium classes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Bradford, A., & Brown, H. (Eds.). (2017). English-medium instruction in Japanese higher education: Policy, challenges and outcomes. London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2016). A contrastive study of interactive metadiscourse in academic papers written in English and in Spanish. In F. A. Almeida, L. C. García, & V. G. Ruiz (Eds.), Corpus-based studies on language varieties. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Carrió-Pastor, M. L., & Casas-Gómez, M. (2015). The use of corpora to identify the pragmatic knowledge associated with different levels of language proficiency. In S. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.), Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
- Carrió-Pastor, M. L., & Martín Marchante, B. (2016). Identificación de errores pragmáticos en un test adaptativo de inglés como lengua extranjera. ELIA, (16), 79–102.Google Scholar
- Carrió-Pastor, M. L., & Mestre-Mestre, E. (2013b). Increasing pragmatic awareness in the L2 classroom. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), Studies and global perspectives of second language teaching and learning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dearden, L. (2014). English as a medium of instruction—A growing global phenomenon. London: The British Council. Retrieved January 29, 2019, from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/e484_emicover_option_3_final_web.pdf.
- Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (Eds.). (2012). English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Eslami, Z., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of nonnative English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs). In E. Alcón Soler & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 178–197). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005a). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of NNEST candidates. NNEST Newsletter, 7(1), 4–7.Google Scholar
- Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Jianda, L. (2006). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Margic, B. D., & Vodopija-Krstanovic, I. (2017). Uncovering English-medium-instruction: Glocal issues in higher education. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar