Advertisement

Tissue Transfer Techniques in the Management of Urethral Stricture Disease: Flaps and Grafts

  • Joel GelmanEmail author
  • James Furr
Chapter

Abstract

The ability to use different flaps and grafts is critical in the successful management of complex urethral strictures. Intimate knowledge of relevant anatomy and principles of tissue transfer are necessary to optimize outcomes. Here, we briefly review these principles and discuss a variety of techniques commonly used by reconstructive urologists depending on stricture length, stricture location, presence or absence of intact corpus spongiosum, and availability of healthy penile skin. We present our algorithms for flap or graft choice and review the pertinent literature supporting their uses.

Keywords

Anterior urethroplasty Buccal mucosal grafts Penile skin flaps Tissue transfer urethral reconstruction 

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Presman D, Greenfield D. Reconstruction of the perineal urethra with a free full-thickness skin graft from the prepuce. J Urol. 1953;69(5):677–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Devine PC, Fallon B, Devine CJ Jr. Free full thickness skin graft urethroplasty. J Urol. 1976;116(4):444–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duckett JW Jr. Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1980;7(2):423–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quartey JK. One-stage penile/preputial island flap urethroplasty for urethral stricture. J Urol. 1985;134(3):474–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schreiter F, Noll F. Mesh graft urethroplasty using split thickness skin graft or foreskin. J Urol. 1989;142(5):1223–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McAninch JW. Reconstruction of extensive urethral strictures: circular fasciocutaneous penile flap. J Urol. 1993;149(3):488–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monseur J. [Widening of the urethra using the supra-urethral layer (author’s transl)]. J Urol (Paris). 1980;86(6):439–49.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barbagli G, Selli C, Tosto A, Palminteri E. Dorsal free graft urethroplasty. J Urol. 1996;155(1):123–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devine PC, Wendelken JR, Devine CJ Jr. Free full thickness skin graft urethroplasty: current technique. J Urol. 1979;121(3):282–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blaschko SD, Harris CR, Zaid UB, Gaither T, Chu C, Alwaal A, et al. Trends, utilization, and immediate perioperative complications of urethroplasty in the United States: data from the national inpatient sample 2000–2010. Urology. 2015;85(5):1190–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barbagli G, Vallasciani S, Romano G, Fabbri F, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek. Eur Urol. 2010;58(1):33–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol. 2004;172(2):580–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, Hacker A, Michel MS, Alken P. Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek? BJU Int. 2005;96(4):619–23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jang TL, Erickson B, Medendorp A, Gonzalez CM. Comparison of donor site intraoral morbidity after mucosal graft harvesting for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 2005;66(4):716–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morey AF, Lin HC, DeRosa CA, Griffith BC. Fossa navicularis reconstruction: impact of stricture length on outcomes and assessment of extended meatotomy (first stage Johanson) maneuver. J Urol. 2007;177(1):184–7; discussion 7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jordan GH. Reconstruction of the fossa navicularis. J Urol. 1987;138(1):102–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Virasoro R, Eltahawy EA, Jordan GH. Long-term follow-up for reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis with a single technique. BJU Int. 2007;100(5):1143–5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterance. Br J Urol. 1998;81(5):735–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Depasquale I, Park AJ, Bracka A. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int. 2000;86(4):459–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chowdhury PS, Nayak P, Mallick S, Gurumurthy S, David D, Mossadeq A. Single stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for navicular fossa strictures. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(1):17–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulkarni SB, Joshi PM, Venkatesan K. Management of panurethral stricture disease in India. J Urol. 2012;188(3):824–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wisenbaugh ES, Gelman J. The use of flaps and grafts in the treatment of urethral stricture disease. Adv Urol. 2015;2015:979868.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Figler BD, Malaeb BS, Dy GW, Voelzke BB, Wessells H. Impact of graft position on failure of single-stage bulbar urethroplasties with buccal mucosa graft. Urology. 2013;82(5):1166–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Di Pierro GB. The advantages of the ventral approach to bulbar urethroplasty. Arab J Urol. 2013;11(4):350–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Armenakas NA. Long-term outcome of ventral buccal mucosal grafts for anterior urethral strictures. AUA News. 2004;9:2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brandes SB. Editorial comment: oral mucosal graft urethroplasty. In: Brandes SB, Morey AF, editors. Advanced male urethral and genital reconstructive surgery. 2. New York: Humana Press; 2014. p. 193–4.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Asopa HS, Garg M, Singhal GG, Singh L, Asopa J, Nischal A. Dorsal free graft urethroplasty for urethral stricture by ventral sagittal urethrotomy approach. Urology. 2001;58(5):657–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mori RL, Angermeier KW. Staged urethroplasty in the management of complex anterior urethral stricture disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4(1):29–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M. Failed hypospadias repair presenting in adults. Eur Urol. 2006;49(5):887–94; discussion 95.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turner-Warwick R. Principles of urethral reconstructions. In: Webster GD, Kirby R, King L, editors. Reconstructive urology. 2. Boston: Blackwell Scientific; 1993. p. 609–42.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guralnick ML, Webster GD. The augmented anastomotic urethroplasty: indications and outcome in 29 patients. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1496–501.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoy NY, Kinnaird A, Rourke KF. Expanded use of a dorsal onlay augmented anastomotic urethroplasty with buccal mucosa for long segment bulbar urethral strictures: analysis of outcomes and complications. Urology. 2013;81(6):1357–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    El-Kassaby AW, El-Zayat TM, Azazy S, Osman T. One-stage repair of long bulbar urethral strictures using augmented Russell dorsal strip anastomosis: outcome of 234 cases. Eur Urol. 2008;53(2):420–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abouassaly R, Angermeier KW. Augmented anastomotic urethroplasty. J Urol. 2007;177(6):2211–5; discussion 5–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morey AF. Urethral plate salvage with dorsal graft promotes successful penile flap onlay reconstruction of severe pendulous strictures. J Urol. 2001;166(4):1376–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gelman J, Sohn W. 1-stage repair of obliterative distal urethral strictures with buccal graft urethral plate reconstruction and simultaneous onlay penile skin flap. J Urol. 2011;186(3):935–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Berglund RK, Angermeier KW. Combined buccal mucosa graft and genital skin flap for reconstruction of extensive anterior urethral strictures. Urology. 2006;68(4):707–10; discussion 10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Palminteri E, Manzoni G, Berdondini E, Di Fiore F, Testa G, Poluzzi M, et al. Combined dorsal plus ventral double buccal mucosa graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):81–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Palminteri E, Lumen N, Berdondini E, Di Pierro GB, Cucchiarale G, Tenti G, et al. Two-sided dorsal plus ventral oral graft bulbar urethroplasty: long-term results and predictive factors. Urology. 2015;85(4):942–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Shokeir AA, Iannotta L, Gentile V, Sciarra A. Two-sided bulbar urethroplasty using dorsal plus ventral oral graft: urinary and sexual outcomes of a new technique. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1766–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marshall SD, Raup VT, Brandes SB. Dorsal inlay buccal mucosal graft (Asopa) urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture. Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4(1):10–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gelman J, Siegel JA. Ventral and dorsal buccal grafting for 1-stage repair of complex anterior urethral strictures. Urology. 2014;83(6):1418–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Reconstructive Urology, Department of UrologyUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations