Advertisement

Management of External Genitalia Gunshot Injuries and Traumatic Avulsions in Civil and Military Conflicts

  • Nathan Shaw
  • Faisal Alhajeri
  • Krishnan Venkatesan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter summarizes evaluation and management of penetrating projectile (gun-shot wound – GSW) trauma to the external genitalia, reviewing current literature and guidelines where available, as well as the authors’ personal experience and expertise.

The chapter starts by reviewing the epidemiology of trauma to the external genitalia and goes on to describe wound ballistics and mechanisms of low and high energy injuries, as well as avulsion injuries.

The care of patients presenting with these injuries is then explained, including evaluation with physical exam, use and utility of different imaging modalities, and when necessary, surgical management.

Introduction: This chapter seeks to provide step-by-step management of penetrating penile and scrotal trauma in civilian and military conflicts. Where possible, validated evidence and guideline based recommendations are made. In areas that lack large validated studies or clear guidelines, we offer clinical expertise in the management of complex genital gun-related trauma. The reader should be able to use this as a general resource for better understanding of penetrating genitourinary (GU) trauma as well as a specific guide to those presented with patients with GU trauma.

Epidemiology: Penetrating GU trauma most commonly involves the kidney. In trauma of the lower genitourinary tract, >75% of injuries involve the penis and/or scrotum. There should always be a high index of suspicion for concomitant injury to other structures (bladder, rectum, etc.) when there is penetrating injury to the penis/scrotum.

Injury Mechanics: The chapter discusses detailed evidence regarding wound ballistics and the effect on surgical management. Generally, penetrating injury can be divided into high and low energy injury. High energy injury should be suspected in rifle or other high velocity ballistic injury and has the most significance in military conflict.

Patient Assessment: This section provides an evidence based algorithm to the patient with GU trauma. History and physical exam augmented with appropriate and timely imaging is the mainstay of the trauma assessment.

Penile, Scrotal and Avulsion Injuries: These sections cover the surgical approaches and management of lower GU trauma (excluding injuries to the bladder). In patients with penile injuries, the practitioner should have a high index of suspicion for injuries to the urethra, bladder, and other pelvic structures. Scrotal ultrasound is a safe, rapid, and effective imaging modality for assessment of testicular injury. In the setting of clear deep penetrating trauma to the scrotum, even with equivocal scrotal ultrasound, surgical exploration should be undertaken. Avulsion injuries should be attempted to be repaired if the phallus has been properly stored. Additionally, prompt psychiatric evaluation if self-mutilation is considered. In all injuries to the lower GU tract, management priorities should be stabilitization of other injuries, urinary drainage, and repair that minimizes long term morbidity.

High Energy Injuries: We offer this section separately, as individuals with these injuries are often in areas of armed conflict with significantly different risks and different access to care. In general, high energy injuries to the external genitalia should carry an even higher index of suspicion for concomitant severe injury. Additionally, high energy injuries/wounds can be difficult to assess in the acute setting. If there is question of wound viability, urinary diversion and observation with staged reconstruction is often employed. This is particularly true in settings where prompt stabilization is required.

Keywords

Penis injury Scrotum injury External genitalia trauma Genital gunshot wound Genital reconstruction Penetrating genital trauma Avulsion 

References

  1. 1.
    Bjurlin MA, Kim DY, Zhao LC, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of penetrating external genital injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:839–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shewakramani S, Reed KC. Genitourinary trauma. Emerg Med Clin North AM. 2011;29(3):501–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García-Perdomo HA. Importance of defining the best treatment of a genital gunshot wound: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2:587–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santucci RA, Bartley JM. Urologic trauma guidelines: A 21 st century update. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:510–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phonsombat S, Master VA, McAninch JW. Penetrating External Genital Trauma: A 30-Year Single Institution Experience. J Urol. 2008;180:192–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cerwinka WH, Block NL. Civilian Gunshot Injuries of the Penis: The Miami Experience. Urology. 2009;73:877–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cline KJ, Mata JA, Venable DD, et al. Penetrating trauma to the male external genitalia. J Trauma. 1998;44:492–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stefanopoulos PK, Hadjigeorgiou GF, Filippakis K, et al. Gunshot wounds: A review of ballistics related to penetrating trauma. J Acute Dis. 2014;3:178–85.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stefanopoulos PK, Filippakis K, Soupiou OT, et al. Wound ballistics of firearm-related injuries-Part 1: Missile characteristics and mechanisms of soft tissue wounding. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:67–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dougherty PJ, Najibi S, Silverton C, et al. Gunshot wounds: epidemiology, wound ballistics, and soft-tissue treatment. Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:131–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santucci RA, Chang YJ. Ballistics for physicians: Myths about wound ballistics and gunshot injuries. J Urol. 2004;171:1408–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bandi G, Santucci RA. Controversies in the management of male external genitourinary trauma. J Trauma. 2004;56:1362–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wessells H, Long L. Penile and genital injuries. Urol Clin North Am. 2006;33:117–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holmes JF. Genitourinary trauma. In: Trauma: a comprehensive emergency medicine approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uehara DT, Eisner RF. Indications for intravenous pyelography in trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:266–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagy KK, Brenneman FD, Krosner SM, et al. Routine preoperative “one-shot” intravenous pyelography is not indicated in all patients with penetrating abdominal trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(6):530–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dane B, Baxter AB, Bernstein MP. Imaging Genitourinary Trauma. Radiol Clin N Am. 2017;55:321–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Churukanti GR, Kim A, Rich DD, et al. Role of ultrasonography for testicular injuries in penetrating scrotal trauma. Urology. 2016;95:208–12. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429516301261 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simhan J, Rothman J, Canter D, et al. Gunshot wounds to the scrotum: A large single-institutional 20-year experience. BJU Int. 2012;109:1704–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott SP, et al. American urological association (AUA) guideline American urological association male urethral stricture. AUA Clin Guidel. 2016:1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lynch TH, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Plas E, et al. EAU guidelines on urological trauma. Eur Urol. 2005;47:1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morey AF, Brandes S, Dugi DD, et al. Urotrauma: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014;192:327–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dedini RD, Karacozoff AM, Shellock FG, et al. MRI issues for ballistic objects: Information obtained at 1.5-, 3- and 7-Tesla. Spine J. 2013;13:815–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Antonini G, Vicini P, Sansalone S, et al. Penile fracture: penoscrotal approach with degloving of penis after Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86:39–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dell’Atti L. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of penile trauma. J Ultrasound. 2016;19:161–6. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005206/ PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    El-Assmy A, El-Tholoth HS, Abou-El-Ghar ME, et al. Risk factors of erectile dysfunction and penile vascular changes after surgical repair of penile fracture. Int J Impot Res. 2012;24:20–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hatzichristodoulou G, Dorstewitz A, Gschwend JE, et al. Surgical management of penile fracture and long-term outcome on erectile function and voiding. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1424–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raheem AA, El-Tatawy H, Eissa A, et al. Urinary and sexual functions after surgical treatment of penile fracture concomitant with complete urethral disruption. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86:15–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pavan N, Tezzot G, Liguori G, et al. Penile fracture: retrospective analysis of our case history with long-term assessment of the erectile and sexological outcome. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86:359–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tamhankar AS, Pawar PW, Sawant AS, et al. Fractured penis: not so rare! Urol Int. 2017;99:63–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    El-Assmy A, El-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, et al. Does timing of presentation of penile fracture affect outcome of surgical intervention? Urology. 2011;77:1388–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kozacıoğlu Z, Ceylan Y, Aydoğdu Ö, et al. An update of penile fractures: long-term significance of the number of hours elapsed till surgical repair on long-term outcomes. Turk Urol Derg. 2017;43:25–2.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hall S, Wagner JR, Edelstein RA, et al. Management of gunshot injuries to the penis and anterior urethra. J Trauma. 1995;38:439–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Perovic SV, Djinovic RP, Bumbasirevic MZ, et al. Severe penile injuries: a problem of severity and reconstruction. BJU Int. 2009;104:676–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morey AF, Metro MJ, Carney KJ, et al. Consensus on genitourinary trauma: external genitalia. BJU Int. 2004;94:507–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Virasoro R, Tonkin JB, Mccammon KA, et al. Penile amputation: cosmetic and functional results. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3:214–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rashid M, Sarwar SUR. Avulsion injuries of the male external genitalia: classification and reconstruction with the customised radial forearm free flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:585–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jordan GH. Management of penile amputation. In: Emergencies in urology. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y c B, Vyas KA, Srivastava RK, et al. Microneurovascular reimplantation in a case of total penile amputation. Indian J Plast Surg. 2008;41:206–10.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fuoco M, Cox L, Kinahan T. Penile amputation and successful reattachment and the role of winter shunt in postoperative viability: A case report and literature review. J Can Urol Assoc. 2015;9:297–E299.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hudolin T, Hudolin I. Surgical management of urogenital injuries at a war hospital in Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1992 to 1995. J Urol. 2003;169:1357–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Janak JC, Orman JA, Soderdahl DW, et al. Epidemiology of genitourinary injuries among male U.S. service members deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: early findings from the trauma outcomes and urogenital health (TOUGH) project. J Urol. 2017;197:414–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gomez RG, Castanheira ACC, McAninch JW. Gunshot wounds to the male external genitalia. J Urol. 1993;150:1147–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pereira BM, Reis LO, Calderan TR, de Campos CC, Fraga GP. Penetrating bladder trauma: a high risk factor for associated rectal injury. Adv Urol. 2014:386280.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hudak SJ, Hakim S. Operative management of wartime genitourinary injuries at Balad air force theater hospital, 2005 to 2008. J Urol. 2009;182:180–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brandes SB, Buckman RF, Chelsky MJ, et al. External genitalia gunshot wounds: a ten-year experience with fifty-six cases. J Trauma. 1995;39:266–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan Shaw
    • 1
  • Faisal Alhajeri
    • 2
  • Krishnan Venkatesan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of UrologyGeorgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.German Board of Urology, Kuwait Urology Board, Urology UnitFarwaniyah HospitalKuwait CityKuwait
  3. 3.MedStar Washington Hospital CenterGeorgetown University School of MedicineWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations