Advertisement

Management of Non-infectious complications during and after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement

  • Jonathan Clavell-Hernández
  • Rafael Carrion
  • Run WangEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Penile prosthesis implantation is an effective treatment option for patients with medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). In the hands of an experienced surgeon, complication rate remains low. Although uncommon, non-infectious complications can be detrimental for patient satisfaction, quality of life and in rare cases, can even threaten the patient’s life. This chapter aims to discuss non-infectious complications during and after penile prosthesis placement. Corporal dilation, when difficult, may lead to complications such as proximal and distal perforations, crossover, erosion and floppy glans syndrome. Postoperatively, hematoma may delay device cycling and increase the risk for infection. Upgrades on the available devices have decreased the incidence of auto-inflation and pump-related complications. Depending on where the prosthetic reservoir is placed, this may lead to other issues which may include leakage, discomfort, torsion of the tubing and injury to bladder, bowel, and pelvic vasculature. The current literature gives us a historical perspective of overall low rates of complications especially with adherence to standard precautions and protocols.

Keywords

Penile prosthesis Erectile dysfunction Surgical complications Corporal crossover Corporal perforation Cylinder erosion Floppy glans Auto-inflation Glans hypermobility Reservoir complication 

References

  1. 1.
    Ziegelmann M, Kohler TS, Bailey GC, et al. Surgical selection and counseling. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):609–19.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henry GD, Kansal NS, Callaway M, et al. Centers of excellence concept and penile prosthesis: an outcome analysis. J Urol. 2009;181:1264–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oberlin DT, Matulewicz BL, et al. National practice patterns of treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Urol. 2015;193:2040–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agrawal V, Ralph D. An audit of implanted penile prosthesis in the UK. BJU Int. 2006;98:393–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moncada I, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Jara J, et al. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation without corporal dilation: a cavernous tissue sparing technique. J Urol. 2010;183:1123–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levine LA, Becher E, Bella A, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13:489–518.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulcahy JJ. The prevention and management of noninfectious complications of penile implants. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3:203–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henry GD, Laborde E. A review of surgical techniques for impending distal erosion and intraoperative penile implant complications: part 2 of a three-part review series on penile prosthetic surgery. J Sex Med. 2012;9:927–36.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karpman E. Management of distal and proximal penile prosthesis crossover. J Sex Med. 2016;13:1008–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mulcahy JJ. Crural perforation during penile prosthetic surgery. J Sex Med. 2006;3:177–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stember DS, Kohler TS, Morey AF. Management of perforation injuries during and following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2015;12(7):456–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR II, et al. Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2005;173:89–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson SK. Rear tip extender sling: a quick and easy repair for crural perforation. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1052–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vollstedt A, Gross MS, Antonini G, Perito PE. The infrapubic surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):620–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anele UA, Le BV, Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation. Sex Med. 2014;2:178–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perito P. Urethral injury during inflatable penile prosthesis: a new repair. Video J Prosthet Urol. 2014;1:034.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levine LA, Hoeh MP. Review of penile prosthetic reservoir: complications and presentation of a modified reservoir placement technique. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2759–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karpman E, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Henry G, et al. Current opinions on alternative reservoir placement for inflatable penile prosthesis among members of the sexual medicine society of North America. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2115–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sadeghi-Nejad H, Munarriz R, Shah N. Intra-abdominal reservoir placement during penile prosthesis surgery in post-robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy patients: a case report and practical considerations. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1547–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson SK, Henry GD, Delk JR, Cleves MA. Mentor Alpha-1 penile prosthesis with reservoir lock-out valve: effective prevention of auto-inflation with improved capability for ectopic reservoir placement. J Urol. 2002;168:1475–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morey AF, Cefalu CA, Hudak SJ. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach. J Sex Med. 2013;10:603–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garber BB, Bickell M. Subcutaneous placement of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoirs. Urology. 2016;88:93–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gupta NK, Ring J, Trost L, et al. The penoscrotal surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):628–38.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kavoussi NL, Hofer MD, Viers BR, et al. Synchronous ipsilateral high submuscular placement of prosthetic balloon and reservoirs. J Sex Med. 2017;14:64–8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Henry G, Hsaio W, Karpman E, et al. A guide for inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placement: pertinent anatomic measurements of the retropubic space. J Sex Med. 2014;11:273–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Furlow WL, Goldwasser B. Salvage of the eroded inflatable penile prosthesis: a new concept. J Urol. 1987;138:312–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kramer AC, Chason JK, Kusakabe A. Report of two cases of bladder perforation caused by reservoir of inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2064–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dupont MC, Hochman HI. Erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into the bladder, presenting as bladder calculi. J Urol. 1988;129:367–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eldefrawy A, Kava BR. An unusual complication during inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Urology. 2010;76:847.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brusky J, Dikranin A, Aboseif S. Retrieval of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir from the bladder. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:302–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fitch WP 3rd, Roddy T. Erosion of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into bladder. J Urol. 1986;136:1080.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stember DS, Garber BB, Perito PE. Outcomes of abdominal wall reservoir placement in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a safe and efficacious alternative to the space of retzius. J Sex Med. 2014;11:605–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hinds PR, Wilson SK, Sadeghi-Nejad H. Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: what practices achieve the best outcomes and lowest infection rates. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2484–92.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Da Justa DG, Bianco FJ Jr, Ogle A, Dhabuwala CB. Deep venous thrombosis due to compression of external iliac vein by the penile prosthesis reservoir. J Urol. 2003;61:462.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deho F, Henry GD, Marone EM, et al. Severe vascular complication after implantation of a three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2956–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brison D, Ilbeigi P, Sadeghi-Nejad H. Reservoir repositioning and successful thrombectomy for deep venous thrombosis secondary to compression of pelvic veins by an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1185–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Flanagan MJ, Krisch EB, Gerber WL. Complication of a penile prosthesis reservoir: venous compression masquerading as a deep venous thrombosis. J Urol. 1991;146:847–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shiraev T, Graham A. Venous thromboembolism secondary to penile prosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:1934.e1–2.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Montague DK. Penile prosthesis corporotomy closure: a new technique. J Urol. 1993;150:924–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pozza D, Pozza M, Musy M, et al. 500 penile prostheses implanted by a surgeon in Italy in the last 30 years. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015;87:216–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX study group. J Urol. 2000;164:376–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Garber BB, Bickell M. Delayed postoperative hematoma formation after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2015;12:265–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:535–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures. BJU Int. 2006;97:129–33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Goldstein I, Newman L, Baum N, et al. Safety and efficacy outcome of mentor alpha-1 inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impotence treatment. J Urol. 1997;157:833–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wilson SC, Delk JI. Hematoma formation following penile prosthesis implantation: to drain or not to drain. J Urol. 1996;55:634A.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Henry GD, Wilson SK. Updates in inflatable penile prostheses. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34:535–47. viPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rozanski AT, Viers BR, Liu AG, et al. Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose (Fibrillar) reduces risk of postoperative corporal bleeding following inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Urology. 2017;108:190–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR II, et al. Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study. J Urol. 2004;172:153–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Antonini G, Busetto GM, Giudice D, et al. Distal corporal anchoring stitch: a technique to address distal corporal crossovers and impending lateral extrusions of a penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2017;14:767–73.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mulcahy JJ. Distal corporoplasty for lateral extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders. J Urol. 1999;161:193–5.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Knoll LD, Furlow WL, Benson RC, Bilhartz DL. Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with the use of a downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1995;153:366–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jordan GH, Alter GJ, Gilbert DA, et al. Penile prosthesis implantation in total phalloplasty. J Urol. 1994;152:410–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Levine LA, Zachary LS, Gottlieb LJ. Prosthesis placement after total phallic reconstruction. J Urol. 1993;149:593–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Seftel AD, Oates RD, Goldstein I. Use of a polytetrafluoroethylene tube graft as a circumferential neotunica during placement of a penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1992;148:1531–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Carson CC, Noh CH. Distal penile prosthesis extrusion: treatment with distal corporoplasty or Goretex windsock reinforcement. Int J Impot Red. 2002;14:81–4.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    La Rochelle J, Levine L. Complications of benign adult penile and scrotal surgery. In: Loughlin KR, editor. Complications of urologic surgery and practice, vol. 2007. New York: Informa Healthcare. p. P213.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bickell M, Manimala N, Parker J, et al. Floppy glans syndrome: pathogenesis and treatment. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:149–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stefani SD, Simonato AM, Capone M, et al. The benefit of glans fixation in prosthetic penile surgery. J Urol. 1994;152:1533–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Morey AF. Reconstructing penile supersonic transporter (SST) deformity using glanulopexy (Glans fixation). J Urol. 2005;174(3):969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ball TP. Surgical repair of penile SST deformity. Urology. 1980;15:603–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mulhall JP, Kim FJ. Reconstructing penile supersonic transporter (SST) deformity using glanulopexy (glans fixation). Urology. 2001;57:1160–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yang C, Martinez D, Baumgarten AS, et al. Ventral or dorsal penoplasty for hypermobile floppy glans after penile prosthesis. Poster session presented at 76th meeting of the Southeast Section American Urologic Association 2015. March 19–22, Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wilson SK, Mora-Estaves C, Egydio P. Glans necrosis following penile prosthesis implantation: prevention and treatment suggestions. Urology. 2017;107:144–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fang A, Wang R. Nondegloving technique for Peyronie’s disease with penile prosthesis implantation and double dorsal-ventral patch graft. Asian J Androl. 2018;20(1):90–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Clavell-Hernandez J, Fang A, Wang R. Non-degloving surgical technique with double dorsal-ventral patch graft and penile prosthesis placement for Peyronie’s disease. Poster presented at 21st ISSM world meeting. Lisbon, Portugal, February 27–March 3, 2018.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Köhler TS, Gupta NK, Wilson SK. Wilson’s pearls, perils, and pitfalls of penile prosthesis surgery. Calvert McBride Publishers. Fort Smith, Arkansas;2018: 127–128.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Garber BB, Khurgin JL, Stember DS, et al. Pseudo-malfunction of the Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis one-touch release pump. Urology. 2014;84:857–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Capoccia EM, Phelps JN, Levine LA. Modified inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placement into space of retzius: comparing outcomes in men with or without prior pelvic surgery. J Sex Med. 2017;14:968–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Ohl DA. The utility of lockout valve reservoirs in preventing autoinflation in penile prostheses. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34(3):379–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Karpman E, Brant WO, Kansas B, et al. Reservoir alternate surgical implantation technique: preliminary outcomes of initial PROPPER study of low profile or spherical reservoir implantation in submuscular location or traditional prevesical space. J Urol. 2015;193(1):239–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kobayashi K, Hisasue S, Shimizu T, et al. Erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis due to autoinflation. J Urol. 2004;50:515–7.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Karpman E, Henry G. Capsular contraction with S-shaped deformity of nonlength-expanding inflatable penile prosthesis cylinders: management and prevention strategies. Sex Med. 2013;1:95–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Abbosh PH, Thom MR, Bullock A. Laparoscopic capsulotomy to treat autoinflation of inflatable penile prostheses. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1212–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sadeghi-Nejad H, Sharma A, Irwin RJ, et al. Reservoir herniation as a complication of three-piece penile prosthesis insertion. Urology. 2011;57:142–5.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chung PH, Morey AF, Tausch TJ, et al. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs: 2-year experience and patient-reported outcomes. Urology. 2014;84:1535–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Clavell-Hernandez, J, Trost L, Köhler T, et al. Emerging complications following alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a 5-year multi-institutional experience. J Urol 2018; pii:S0022-5347(18)44022-0., 199Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Staller AL, Chang CM, Wagenheim GN, Wang R. A novel approach for removal of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir using laparoscopic instruments. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:132–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    O’Rourke JRTK, Alexander E, Zhang Y, Wosnitzer MS. Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 5):S832–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kim DS, Yang KM, Chung HJ, et al. AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2602–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chung E, Van CT, Wilson I, et al. Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after 955 procedures. World J Urol. 2013;31:591–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, et al. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prosthesis: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Grewal S, Vetter J, Brandes SB, et al. A population-based analysis of contemporary rates of reoperation for penile prosthesis procedures. Urology. 2014;84:112–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Clavell-Hernández
    • 1
  • Rafael Carrion
    • 2
  • Run Wang
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.St Joseph Medical CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Division of UrologyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center-McGovern Medical SchoolHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of UrologyUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations