Use of Fasciocutaneous and Myocutaneous Flaps in Complex Urethral Reconstruction

  • Cooper R. Benson
  • Steven B. BrandesEmail author


The management of complex urethral pathology with associated adverse local tissue environment often requires the use fasciocutaneous, muscular and myocutaneous flaps. While these complex cases are a minority of those encountered by the reconstructive urologist, it is essential to have good working knowledge of how and when to utilize these reconstructive techniques. In this chapter we will detail a variety of flaps and composite flap/graft techniques that are utilized in complex reconstruction for a variety of case scenarios. The perineal artery fasciocutaneous flap is a versatile flap that can be utilized for perineal wound coverage and also for bulbar urethral reconstruction. The gracilis muscular flap is one of the major workhorses in urologic reconstruction given its proximity to the perineum and minimal donor site morbidity related to flap harvesting. The gracilis muscle can be used to support buccal mucosal grafts and also used to fill in perineal dead space in a variety of situations. Similarly, the gluteus maximus flap, while less commonly used, is an important tool at the disposal of the reconstructive urologist. The rectus abdominus muscular and myocutaneous flaps can also be used to fill in dead space in the pelvis and perineum in select situations.


Urethral reconstruction Urethral stricture Perineal artery fasciocutaneous flap Gracilis flap Gluteus maximus flap Urorectal fistulae 


  1. 1.
    Hallock GG, Ahmadzadeh R, Morris SF. Classification of flaps. In: Wei FC, Mardini S, editors. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2017. p. e1–e10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milton SH. Pedicles skin-flaps: the fallacy of the length: width ratio. Br J Surg. 1970;57(7):502–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ponten B. The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg. 1981;34(2):215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathes ST, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jordan GH. Scrotal and perineal flaps for anterior urethral reconstruction. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29:411–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gil-Vernet J, Arango O, Gil-Vernet A, Gil Vernet J, Gelabert-Mas A. A new biaxial epilated scrotal flap for reconstructive urethral surgery. J Urol. 1997;158:412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gil-Vernet JM. Traitement des Stenoses Post-Traumatiques de l’Urethre. XIV Congres de la Societe Internationale d’Urologie. Paris: G et R. Joly; 1967. p. 271–3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blandy JP, Singh M, Tresidder GC. Urethroplasty by scrotal flap for long urethral stricture. Br J Urol. 1968;40:261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blandy JP, Singh M. The technique and results of one stage island patch urethroplasty. Br J Urol. 1975;47:83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morton KE, Davies D, Dewhurst J. The use of the fasciocutaneous flap in vaginal reconstruction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93(9):970–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagerty RC, Vaughn TR, Lutz MIJ. The perineal artery axial flap in reconstruction of the vagina. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:344–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wee JT, Joseph VT. A new technique of vaginal reconstruction using neurovascular pudendal-thigh flaps: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:701–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tzarnas CD, Raezer OM, Castillo OA. A unique fasciocutaneous flap for posterior urethral repair. Urology. 1994;43:379–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zinman L. Extragenital muscular myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps in urethral reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24:683–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zinman L. Selective use of the perineal artery fasciocutaneous flap (Singapore) in urethral reconstruction. In: Schreiter F, Jordan GH, editors. Urethral Reconstructive Surgery. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 153–60. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woods JE, Alter G, Meland B, et al. Experience with vaginal reconstruction utilizing the modified Singapore flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:270–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zinman LN, Buckley JC. The application of muscular, myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps as adjuncts in complex refractory urethral disorders. In: Brandes SB, Morey AF, editors. Advanced male urethral and genital reconstructive surgery 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 249–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brandes SB. Complex urinary fistulas of the posterior urethra and bladder. In: Brandes SB, Morey AF, editors. Advanced male urethral and genital reconstructive surgery 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 351–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giodano PA, Abbes M, Pequignot JB. Gracilis blood supply: anatomical and clinical re-evaluation. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morris SF, Yand D. Gracilis muscle: arterial and neural basis for subdivision. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:630–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soper JT, Larson D, Hunter VJ, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL. Short gracilis myocutaneous flaps for vulvovaginal reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(5):823–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen SH, Hentz VR, Wei FC, Chen YR. Short gracilis myocutaneous flaps for vulvoperineal and inguinal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95(2):372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morey AF, McAninch JW. When and how to use buccal mucosal grafts in adult bulbar urethroplasty. Br J Urol. 1996;48:194–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palmer DA, Buckley JC, Zinman LN, Vanni AJ. Urethroplsaty for high risk, long segment urethral strictures with ventral buccal mucosa graft and gracilis muscle flap. J Urol. 2015;193:902–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaufman DA, Zinman LN, Buckley JC, Marcello P, Browne BM, Vanni AJ. Short- and long-term complications and outcomes of radiation and surgically induced rectourethral fistula repair with buccal mucosa graft and muscle interposition flap. Urology. 2016;98:170–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Enol OO. The transformation of a free skin graft into a vascularized pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:470–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zinman L. Muscular, myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps in complex urethral reconstruction. Urol Clin N Am. 2002;29:443–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Whetzel TP, Lechtman AN. The gracilis myofasciocutaneous flap: vascular anatomy and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1642–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mathes SJ, Bostwick J. A rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap to reconstruct abdominal wall defects. Br J Plast Surg. 1977;30:285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaufman DA, Browne BM, Zinman LN, Vanni AJ. Management of radiation anterior prostato-symphyseal fistulas with interposition rectus abdominis muscle flap. Urology. 2016;92:122–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations