Advertisement

Designing for Democratic Engagement

  • Margaret DoyleEmail author
  • Nick O’Brien
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter shifts the focus to the broader post-war design culture. It considers the way in which urban design and planning met challenges similar to those encountered by administrative justice and human rights during the same period and explains how alternatives to the priorities of individual user, system and closure were expressed in the values of community, network and openness. The post-war vogue for Scandi-design, the celebrations of the Festival of Britain and the contested territory between the ‘new humanists’ and the ‘new brutalists’ emerge as directly relevant to contemporary options for administrative justice in an age characterised by a ‘digital by default’ mentality.

Keywords

Community Network Openness Design history Consumerism Participation 

References

  1. Barry, G. (1952). The Festival of Britain 1951. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 100(4880), 667–704.Google Scholar
  2. Bonsiepe, G. (2010). Design and Democracy. London: Bedford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Etherington, Sir Terence, Master of the Rolls. (2017). Lord Slynn Memorial Lecture, June 2017, on Court Estate and Virtual Hearings. Judiciary of England and Wales.Google Scholar
  4. Griffiths, S., & Kippin, H. (2013). Introduction. In H. Kippin et al. (Eds.), Public Services: A New Reform Agenda. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  5. Grindrod, J. (2013). Concretopia: A Journey around the Rebuilding of Postwar Britain. Brecon: Old Street Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Hanley, L. (2017). Estates: An Intimate History. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, A. (2010). Romantic Moderns: English Writers, Artists and the Imagination from Virginia Woolf to John Piper. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  8. Howard, E. (1965). Garden Cities of To-Morrow. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, A. (2002). From Solving Problems to Selling Product: The Changing Role of Designers in Post-war Britain. Designing Britain 1945–1975. University of Brighton. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from https://vads.ac.uk/learning/designingbritain/html/crd_desref.html
  10. Jacobs, J. (2000). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  11. Mae Architects. (2014). Places for Strangers: Ideas for Places, People and the City (S. Bose, Ed.). Zurich: Park Books.Google Scholar
  12. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. McCarthy, F. (1972). All Things Bright & Beautiful: Design in Britain 1830 to Today. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. McCarthy, F. (1982). British Design Since 1880: A Visual History. London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
  15. McCarthy, F. (2014). Anarchy & Beauty: William Morris and His Legacy 1960–1960. London: National Portrait Gallery.Google Scholar
  16. McCormick, M. (2014). Changing Times, Changing Designs: Council Offices Then and Now. Failed Architecture blog.Google Scholar
  17. Minton, A. (2012). Ground Control: Fear and Happiness in the Twenty-First-Century City. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Mulcahy, L. (2011). Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Mussari, M. (2016). Danish Modern: Between Art and Design. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Narkiewicz-Laine, C. (undated). Good Design is a Human Right: An Essay that Commemorates the 65th Anniversary of Good Design. Chicago Athenaeum Museum of Architecture and Design.Google Scholar
  21. O’Hara, G. (2008a). The Intellectuals’ Ideal: British Views of Scandinavia in the 1950s and 1960s. In J. E. Myhre (Ed.), Intellectuals in the Public Sphere in Britain and Norway after World War II. Oslo: Oslo Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. O’Hara, G. (2008b). Applied Socialism of a Fairy Moderate Kind. Scandinavian Journal of History, 33(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Project for Public Spaces. (undated). Eleven Principles for Creating Great Community Places. Project for Public Spaces blog.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, R. (2017). A Place for All People. Edinburgh: Canongate.Google Scholar
  25. Russell, J. (2014). Peggy Angus: Designer, Teacher, Painter. Eastbourne: Antiques Collectors’ Club/Towner.Google Scholar
  26. Sachs, A. (2007). The South African Experience—Interview with Martin Crick. In DRC Legal Achievements 2000–2007. London: Disability Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Sennett, R. (2018). Building and Dwelling. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  28. Sossin, L. (2017). Designing Administrative Justice. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 34(1), 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Terrett, B. (2012a). A Few Notes on Typography. GDS Blog.Google Scholar
  30. Terrett, B. (2012b). Ben Terrett on designing GOV.UK. GDS Blog.
  31. Tomlinson, J. (2017). The Policy and Politics of Building Tribunals for a Digital Age: How ‘Design Thinking’ is Shaping the Future of the Public Law System. UK Constitutional Law blog.Google Scholar
  32. Woodham, J. M. (1997). Twentieth-Century Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Yallop, J. (2015). Dreamstreets: A Journey through Britain’s Village Utopias. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EssexLondonUK
  2. 2.University of LiverpoolStockportUK

Personalised recommendations