A Performance Assessment Framework for Baijiu Sustainable Supply Chain in China

  • Xianglan JiangEmail author
  • Yinping Mu
  • Jiarong Luo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1002)


The production and consumption of Baijiu has great impact on environmental, social, and economic performance in supply chain management. In the face of industry issues like imbalance supply and demand, irrational structure, uneven regional development, resource consumption, and social wellbeing, there is an urgent need for companies to assess sustainability from supply chain perspective. The Chinese economy is developing at a good pace and there is an enormous demand for Baijiu in the country. However, research on the three sustainable dimensions is still sparsity in this field. This paper proposes a framework for identifying environmental, social and economic criteria for Baijiu supply chain, and applies fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) for prioritizing criteria. The framework is applied in a real case study at a Baijiu company in China. Economic dimension has been reported as the most important dimension, social second and environmental third. Results from this framework could provide sustainable development and management insights for decision makers in Baijiu industry in China.


Baijiu (Chinese liquor) Performance assessment Supply chain Sustainability 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the Grant Nos.71772025, 71671118 and 71702156, the Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education of China (17YJC630098), the Sichuan Provincial Education Department of Key Research Base Key Program (No. CJZ17-02), Sichuan Social Science Key Research Base Project (Xq18C07), the Doctoral Fund Project of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (Nos.2017RCSK21 and 2018RCSK01), the Sichuan Science and Technology Department Project (No.2019JDR0026), and the General Project of Sichuan Education Department (No.18SB0400).


  1. 1.
    Seuring, S., Müller, M.: From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 16(15), 1699–1710 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rajeev, A., Pati, R.K., et al.: Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 162, 299–314 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar, G., Subramanian, N., Ramkumar, M.: Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: Role of dynamic capability. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 203, 96–109 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reefke, H., Sundaram, D.: Sustainable supply chain management: Decision models for transformation and maturity. Decis. Support. Syst. 113, 56–72 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keeble, B.R.: The Brundtland report: Our common future. Med. War 4(1), 17–25 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seuring, S.: A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support. Syst. 54(4), 1513–1520 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elkington, J.: Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 8(1), 37–51 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boukherroub, T., Ruiz, A., et al.: An integrated approach for sustainable supply chain planning. Comput. Oper. Res. 54, 180–194 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brandenburg, M.: A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects. Omega 70, 58–76 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, H., Gao, Y., et al.: Characterization and comparison of microbial community of different typical Chinese liquor Daqus by PCRCDGGE. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 53(2), 134–140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi, J., Xiao, Y., et al.: Analyses of microbial consortia in the starter of Fen liquor. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48(4), 478–485 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zheng, X., Han, B.: Baijiu, Chinese liquor: history, classification and manufacture. J. Ethn. Foods 3(1), 19–25 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang, X., Xu, J., et al.: Network design towards sustainability of chinese baijiu industry from a supply chain perspective. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chardine-Baumann, E., Botta-Genoulaz, V.: A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Comput. Ind. Eng. 76, 138–147 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Delgado, C.: Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195, 259–272 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper, M.C., Lambert, D.M., Pagh, J.D.: Supply chain management: more than a new name for logistics. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 8(1), 1–14 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., Jayaraman, V.: Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. J. Oper. Manag. 25(6), 1075–1082 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Govindan, K.: Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195, 419–431 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reefke, H., Sundaram, D.: Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management-identification and evaluation. Omega 66, 195–211 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter, C.R., Rogers, D.S.: A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38(5), 360–387 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iyer, A.V., Bergen, M.E.: Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Manag. Sci. 43(4), 559–570 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kotzab, H.: Improving supply chain performance by efficient consumer response? A critical comparison of existing ECR approaches. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 14(5/6), 364–377 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ippolito, R.A.: Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. J. Law Econ. 35(1), 45–70 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Porter, M.: The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, USA (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh, S., Olugu, E.U., et al.: Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework. J. Intell. Manuf. 29(1), 1–18 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garcia, D.J., You, F.: Supply chain design and optimization: Challenges and opportunities. Comput. Chem. Eng. 81, 153–170 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cooper, R., Kaplan, R.S.: Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harv. Bus. Rev. 69(3), 130–135 (1991)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turny Peter, B.B.: Activity Based Costing The Performance Breakthrough. Kogan, UK (1997)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sink, D.S., Tuttle, T.C.: Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future. Industrial Engineering And Management (1989)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tangen, S.: Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 53(8), 726–737 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beamon, B.M.: Measuring supply chain performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 19(3), 275–292 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., Lai, K.H.: An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 130(1), 1–15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    You, F., Tao, L., et al.: Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and inputCoutput analysis. AIChE J. 58(4), 1157–1180 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications-Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert. Syst. Appl. 42(8), 4126–4148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management SchoolSichuan University of Science & EngineeringZigongPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Management and EconomicsUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Sichuan Technology & Business CollegeDujiangyanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of Management and EconomicsSouthwest University of Science and TechnologyMianyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations