Advertisement

Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Organizational Performance and Moderating Role of Innovation Culture: A Case of Pakistan Textile Industry

  • Muhammad Hashim
  • Sajjad Ahmad BaigEmail author
  • Fiza Amjad
  • Muhammad Nazam
  • Muhammad Umair Akram
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1002)

Abstract

In today’s competitive environment, the role of innovation is getting more popularity in organizations. Innovation and Supply chain management (SCM) play very important role for getting a competitive position in global environment. The study aims to investigate the impact of SCM practices on organizational performance through the moderating role of role of innovation culture. Data for investigation were collected through field survey from Pakistani textile industries and total response rate was 86% (236/275). Current study employed the Smart-PLS Analysis technique for data analysis. The results showed that SCM practices have significant impact on organization performance. However, the moderator makes the relationship stronger among SSP, CR, LIS, LIQ, ILP and organizational performance. While the innovation culture significantly moderates the relationship between SCM Practices and organization performance. In the era of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) the findings of current study provide insights into Mangers regarding how to improve the SCM projects for getting more benefits from ongoing projects. Further research can formulate additional measurements for practices of internal supply chain like quality management, supply integration and competitive advantage as a moderator.

Keywords

Supply chain management Innovation culture Organizational performance and Textile manufacturing Industry 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their very valuable and helpful suggestions for improving the quality of present research.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed, Y.: Textile industry of Pakistan. Horizon securities SMC (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arsalan Supply chain management and textile industry of Pakistan. Arsalan’s dawn article (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balsmeier, P., Voisin, W.J.: Supply chain management: a time-based strategy. Ind. Manag.-Chic. Then Atlanta 39, 24–27 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belfanti, N., Adoption of lean practices as management innovation. A review and conceptualisation. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 18(2):242–277 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castro, M.D., Delgado-Verde, M.: The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80(2), 351–363 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan, A.T.L., Ngai, E.W.T., Moon, K.K.L.: The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 259(2) (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chavez, R., Gimenez, C.: Internal lean practices and operational performance: the contingency perspective of industry clock speed. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33(5), 562–5888 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Childerhouse, P., Towill, D.R.: Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration. Omega 31(1), 17–27 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chizzo, S.A.: Supply chain strategies: solutions for the customer-driven enterprise. Supply Chain. Manag. Dir. 1(1), 4–9 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen, C., Raynor, M.: The innovator’s solution: creating and sustaining successful growth. In: Harvard Business School Press (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dell, M.: The power of virtual integration: an interview with dell computer’s Michael dell. interview by Joan Magretta. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76(2):73–84 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dubey, R., Altay, N.: Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 38(10), 129–148 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hair, Jr., F.J., Sarstedt, M.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(2), 106–121 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flynn, B., Pagell, M., Fugate, B.: Survey research design in supply chain management: the need for evolution in our expectations. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 54 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fraser, J.: Metrics that matter: uncovering KPIS that justify operational improvements. In: Research Project Carried out by Manufacturing Enterprise Solutions Association (MESA) and Presented at Plant2Enterprise Conference, pp. 24–25 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Govindarajan, V., Trimble, C.: Organizational dna for strategic innovation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 47(3), 47–76 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., Tirtiroglu, E.: Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21(1/2), 71–87 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamel, G.: Leading the revolution. In: Plume (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hashim, M., Nazam, M.: Application of multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm for sustainable strategic supplier selection under fuzzy environment. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 10(2) (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hashim, M., Yao, L.: Multi-objective optimization model for supplier selection problem in fuzzy environment. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, pp. 1201–1213 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R.: The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 20(4), 277–319 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoek, R.I.V., Vos, B., Commandeur, H.R.: Restructuring European supply chains by implementing postponement strategies. Long Range Plan. 32(5), 505–518 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holmberg, S.: A systems perspective on supply chain measurements. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 30(10), 847–868 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jones, C.: Moving beyond ERP: making the missing link. Logist. Focus 6, 2–7 (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B.: The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega 34(2), 107–124 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCormack, K.: What supply chain management practices relate to superior performance? In: DRK Research Team (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McGowan, A.: Perceived benefits of abcm implementation. Account. Horiz. 12(1), 31–50 (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mentzer, J.T., Min, S., Zacharia, Z.G.: The nature of interfirm partnering in supply chain management. J. Retail. 76(4), 549–568 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Menzel, H.C., Aaltio, I., Ulijn, J.M.: On the way to creativity: Engineers as intrapreneurs in organizations. Technovation 27(12), 732–743 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Michael, H.: Deep change. How operational innovation can transform your company. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82(4), 84–93 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moberg, C.R., Cutler, B.D.: Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. & Logist. Manag. 32(9), 755–770 (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Monczka, R.M., Petersen, K.J.: Success actors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decis. Sci. 29(3), 553–577 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Naylor, J.B., Naim, M.M., Berry, D.: Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62(1C2), 107–118 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T.: Lean thinking. In: Simon and Schuster (1996)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Senge, P.M., Carstedt, G.: Innovating our way to the next industrial revolution. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 42(2), 24 (2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stein, T., Sweat, J.: Killer supply chains. Inf. Week 708(9), 36–46 (1998)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P., Kasarda, J.D.: Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: the role of fit. J. Oper. Manag. 18(5), 531–547 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sum, C.C, Yang, K.K.: An analysis of material requirements planning (MRP) benefits using alternating conditional expectation (ACE). J. Oper. Manag. 13(1), 35–58 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R., Handfield, R.B.: Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 34(3), 2 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tompkins, J., Ang, D.: What are your greatest challenges related to supply chain performance measurement? IIE Solut. 31(6), 66 (1999)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Towill, D.R.: The seamless supply chain - the predator’s strategic advantage. Int. J. Technol. Manag. = J. Int. Gest.N Technol. 13(1), 37–56 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vickery, S., Calantone, R., Droge, C.: Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 35(3), 16–24 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vickery, S.K., Jayaram, J.: The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. J. Oper. Manag. 21(5), 523–539 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vijayasarathy, L., Robey, D.: The effect of EDI on market channel relationships in retailing. Inf. Manag. 33(2), 73–86 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A., Mavondo, F.T.: Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Technovation 19(8), 507–518 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yoshino, M.Y., Rangan, U.S.: Strategic alliances: an entrepreneurial approach to globalization. Long Range Plan. 29(6), 1241 (1995)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhang, Q.: Technology Infusion Enabled Value-chain Flexibility: A Learning and Capability-Based Perspective. Lambert Academic Publication (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Hashim
    • 1
  • Sajjad Ahmad Baig
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fiza Amjad
    • 1
  • Muhammad Nazam
    • 2
  • Muhammad Umair Akram
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management ScienceNational Textile University FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Institute of Business Management SciencesUniversity of Agriculture FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Guanghua School of ManagementPeking UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations