Advertisement

Evaluation and Comparative Study of Provincial Resilience in China

  • Chao HuangEmail author
  • Jihui Zhong
  • Jing Wu
  • Jiaqi Fan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1002)

Abstract

With the growth of population, urbanization, industrialization and other social processes, China has entered a period of high incidence of all kinds of emergencies. The problem of hazard prevention and mitigation has become increasingly prominent. Thus more and more attention has been paid to the concept of resilience. In this paper, we evaluated the provincial resilience of China with the entropy method. The evaluation was based on the BRIC model proposed by Carter, which consists of five aspects: resilience of the economy, the resilience of society, resilience of environment, resilience of infrastructure, and resilience of organization. The data of the 31 provinces originated from the National Statistical Yearbook, China Environmental Statistical Yearbook, and China Energy Yearbook et al. The results of evaluation and comparison showed that the general level of provincial resilience is quite low. Meanwhile, the differences among provinces are relatively large. The resilience has a significant correlation with the economic development level of provinces, infrastructure construction, and ecological environment.

Keywords

Provincial resilience Evaluation of resilience Comparative study Entropy value method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Sichuan Social Science Planning Project, “Research on the Theory and Method of Statistical Measurement of Provincial Resilience in China” (SC18TJ017), Chengdu Social Science Planning Project, “Comparative Study on the Sustainable Development of Chengdu and World Cities Based on Resilience Theory” (2018A12), and the NSFC project “Study on Risk Assessment and Resilience Construction Strategy of Urban Lifeline System in Xiong’ an New District”, (71741038).

References

  1. 1.
    Adger, W.: Social and ecological resilience: are they related. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 24(3), 347–364 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alliance, R.: Resilience (2017). http://www.resalliance.org/576.php
  3. 3.
    Alshehri, S.A., Rezgui, Y., Li, H.: Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster. Nat. Hazards 75(3), 2221–2245 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnett, J.: Adapting to climate change in pacific island countries: the problem of uncertainty. World Dev. 29(6), 977–993 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boer, P.T.D., Kroese, D.P., et al.: A tutorial on the cross-entropy method. Ann. Oper. Res. 134(1), 19–67 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruneau, M., Reinhorn, A.: Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities. Earthqu. Spectra 23(1), 41–62 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burton, C.G.: A validation of metrics for community resilience to natural hazards and disasters using the recovery from hurricane katrina as a case study. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 105(1), 67–86 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, F.X., Chen, Y.H.: The method to determine the weight of interval number decision matrix attribute—Entropy value method. J. Anhui Univ. Sci. 30(5), 4–6 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fishwick, M.W.: The resilient city: how modern cities recover from disaster. J. Am. Cult. 28(4), 456–456 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorczyca, B.: Searching for safety. State J. (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holling, C.S.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4(4), 1–23 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu, J., Yan, Y., et al.: Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. (8) (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, J.C.: Who has been observing and discussing the disaster response capacity of the coastal areas in Hong Tai area (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, J.Y., Zeng, Z.P.: Construction of elastic city evaluation index system and its empirical study. E-Gov. 03, 82–88 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., et al.: Community and regional resilience: perspective from hazard, disasters, and emergency management. Commun. Reg. Resil. Initiat. 1, 383–398 (2008a)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., et al.: A place-based model for understanding community capability to natural disasters. Glob Env. Chang. 10, 598–606 (2008b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cutter, S.L., Burton, C., Emrich, C.T.: Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline continuations. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 1, 1–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, T., Niu, P., Gu, C.: Overview of research framework of elastic city. J. Urban Plan. 5, 23–31 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, Y., Zhai, G.F.: Study on urban disaster resilience evaluation and improvement strategies in china. Planners 33(08), 5–11 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meng, L.J.: Based on the rata resilience evaluation system of community already promotion strategy—royal disaster in tianjin hedong district cooperation way both communities, for example Urban planning society of China, Shenyang municipal people’s government. In: Planning for 60 Years: achievements and Challenges, Proceedings of 2016 Annual Meeting of China’s Urban Planning. The urban planning society of China, Shenyang municipal people’s government: 2016–12 (in Chinese) (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maru, Y.T.: Resilient regions: clarity of concepts and challenges to nay measurement. CSIRO Sustainable graphics (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mishra, A., Ghate, R., et al.: Building ex ante resilience of disaster-exposed mountain communities: drawing insights from the nepal earthquake recovery. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 22, 167–178 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noy, I., Yonson, R.: Economic vulnerability and resilience to natural hazards: a survey of concepts and measurements. Sustainability 10(8), 2850 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orencio, P., Fujii, M.: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M.: Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69(4), 369–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sensier, M., Bristow, G., Healy, A.: Measuring regional economic resilience across europe: operationalizing a complex concept. Spat. Econ. Anal. 11, 1–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shao, Y., Jiang, X.: Understanding urban resilience: a conceptual analysis based on integrated international literature review. Urban Plan. Int. (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shaw, R., Team, I.: Climate disaster resilience: focus on coastal urban citizen asia. Asian J. Environ. Disaster Manag. 1, 101–116 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cutter, S.L., Ash, K.D., Emrich, C.T.: The geographies of community disaster resilience. Glob. Environ. Chang. 29(29), 65–77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walker, B., Holling, C.S., et al.: The resilience, the adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yun, Y.X.: Discussion on the evaluation index of community disaster resilience from the perspective of fire safety. (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations