With increasingly severe environmental regulations(ER), the need to develop efficient strategies towards environmental protection and high performance is a pressing issue for enterprises. However, extant literature on the subject rarely discusses how different environmental strategy orientations mediate the relationships involved in the Porter Hypothesis(PH). Therefore, this study focuses on an environmental strategy response to ER, and sustained high performance, by incorporating the idea of technology innovation(TI). We first divide environmental strategy into two modes: proactive environmental strategy(PES) and reactive environmental strategy(RES). We then contextualize two models to analyze the ER and enterprise performance(EP) correlation; and test the mediating effect of TI on this relationship, adhering to PES. The empirical data on 760 Chinese A-share listed enterprises in 2017 indicates that there is no generality in PH. An enterprises environmental strategic orientation may cause PH and traditional hypothesis disparity. ER is positively correlated with EP, with TI playing an intermediary role, in the PES mode; but in the RES approach, ER and EP exhibit a negative connect. This study holds great significance for enterprises aspiring to reinforce environmental protection, and promote strategic transformation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 71702118; and the Chengdu Social Science Planning Project, grant number 2018R13.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Andr, F.J.: Strategic effects and the porter hypothesis. MPRA Paper (2015)Google Scholar
Aragón-Correa, J.A., Hurtado-Torres, N., et al.: Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 86(1), 88–103 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S.B.: Corporate environmentalism: the construct and its measurement. J. Bus. Res. 55(3), 177–191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnall, N., Jolley, G.J., Ytterhus, B.: Understanding the relationship between a facility’s environmental and financial performance. Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour, pp. 213–259 (2007)Google Scholar
De Marchi, V.: Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 41(3), 614–623 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., et al.: Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. J. World Bus. 43(2), 131–145 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, L., Marin, G., Miriello, C.: The greener the better? Job creation effects of environmentally-friendly technological change. Ind. Corp. Chang. 25(5), 779–807 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, A., Kapur, S.: Regulatory attitudes and environmental innovation in a model combining internal and external R&D. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 61(3), 327–340 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., Wilcoxen, P.J.: Environmental regulation and US economic growth. Rand J. Econ. 314–340 (1990)Google Scholar
Kneller, R., Manderson, E.: Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resour. Energy Econ. 34(2), 211–235 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latan, H., Jabbour, C.J.C., et al.: Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. J. Clean. Prod. 180, 297–306 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maçaneiro, M.B., da Cunha, S.K., et al.: A regulamentação ambiental conduzindo estratégias ecoinovativas na indústria de papel e celulose. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 19(1), 65–83 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manello, A.: Productivity growth, environmental regulation and win-win opportunities: the case of chemical industry in Italy and Germany. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(2), 733–743 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, K., Oates, W.E., Portney, P.R.: Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J. Econ. Perspect. 9(4), 119–132 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagiannakis, G., Voudouris, I., Lioukas, S.: The road to sustainability: exploring the process of corporate environmental strategy over time. Bus. Strat. Environ. 23(4), 254–271 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.: Americas green strategy. Business and the environment: a reader 33 (1996)Google Scholar
Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C.: Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9(4), 97–118 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkka, L., Junnila, S.: Gravitational slingshot analogy of discontinuous sustainability innovation in the construction industry. Constr. Innov. 15(4), 409–427 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B., Nath, P.: The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 23(2), 169–182 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., Verdolini, E.: Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83, 288–300 (2015)Google Scholar
Ryszko, A.: Proactive environmental strategy, technological Eco-innovation and firm performancełcase of Poland. Sustainability 8(2), 156 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarker, T.K.: Voluntary codes of conduct and their implementation in the Australian mining and petroleum industries: is there a business case for CSR? Asian J. Bus. Ethics 2(2), 205–224 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., Pablo, A.L., Vredenburg, H.: Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: the importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 35(1), 87–108 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taygashinova, K., Akhmetova, A.: Accounting for environmental costs as an instrument of environmental controlling in the company. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 30(1), 87–97 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S.: The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur. Manag. J. 22(5), 557–572 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, W., Ramanathan, R., Nath, P.: Environmental pressures and performance: an analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 117, 160–169 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bl, Yuan, Sg, Ren, et al.: The difference effect of environmental regulation on two stages of technology innovation in China’s manufacturing industry. Front. Eng. Manag. 3, 24–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zrelli, H., Belloumi, M.: Environmental stakeholders, environmental strategies, and productivity of Tunisian manufacturing industries. Middle East Dev. J. 7(1), 108–126 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar