The Masculine Warrior: Militarized Masculinities and Gender Regimes

  • Stephanie SzitanyiEmail author


Accepting the notion of the military as an exclusively male institution would position any policy changes that increase the number of women who serve in the military as progressive. To dispel this, the chapter offers a brief review of women’s historical participation in the military before considering discursive mechanisms that attempt to construe the institution as all-male despite women’s service. It then broadens in scope to incorporate sexual orientation and policies related to regulating soldiers’ sexualities to showcase the heteronormative nature of the military’s gender regime. Finally, the chapter bridges the two bodies of literature that ground the overall study of the book—feminist institutionalism and feminist international relations—to examine what role processes of militarism and militarization play in enabling and maintaining the military’s gender regime of heteromale privilege.


  1. Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 1992. From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. Contemporary Sociology 21 (5): 565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, B. 2009. America’s Army: Making the All-Volunteer Force. Boston: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkawi, T., C. Dandeker, M.W. Petry, and E. Kier. 2002. Rights and Fights: Sexual Orientation and Military Effectiveness. International Security 27 (2): 181–201.Google Scholar
  5. Belkin, A. 2012. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bowman, Tom. 2015. Can Female Marines Carry the Load and Kill the Enemy? NPR. Special Series: Back at Base.
  7. Burke, C. 2002. Women and Militarism. Accessed February 20, 2006. content/uploads/2012/10/Unknownyear_Women_and_Militarism.pdf.
  8. Cohn, C. 2000. ‘How Can She Claim Equal Rights When She Doesn’t Have to Do As Many Pushups As I Do?’ The Framing of Men’s Opposition to Women’s Equality in the Military? Men and Masculinities 3 (2): 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell, R.W. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Currier, A. 2010. Political Homophobia in Postcolonial Namibia. Gender & Society 24 (1): 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Defense. 2018. Annual Report on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service Academies: Academic Program Year 2017–2018.
  13. Eichler, M. 2014. Militarized Masculinities in International Relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs 21 (1): 81–93.Google Scholar
  14. Enloe, C. 1983. Does Khaki Become You? The Militarization of Women’s Lives. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2002. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ferguson, K., and P. Turnbull. 1999. Oh, Say, Can You See? The Semiotics of the Military in Hawai’i. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, L.T. 2013. An Encyclopedia of American Women at War: From the Home Front to the Battlefields. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  18. Francke, L.B. 1997. Ground Zero: The Gender Wars in the Military. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, J. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hooper, C. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jain, P. 2015. Should the Homosexuals Be Allowed to Service in Armed Forces: A Critical Analysis. ISOR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 20 (2): 12–15.Google Scholar
  22. Kerber, L.K. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kier, E. 1998. Homosexuals in the U.S. Military: Open Integration and Combat. International Security 23 (2): 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kronsell, A. 2005. Gendered Practices in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity: Reflections from Feminist Standpoint Theory. International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (2): 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2012. Gender, Sex and the Postnational Defense: Militarism and Peacekeeping. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Levy, Y. 1997. How Militarization Drives Political Control of the Military: The Case of Israel. Political Power and Social Theory 11: 103–133.Google Scholar
  27. Lutz, C. 2002. Making War at Home in the United States: Militarization and the Current Crisis. American Anthropologist 104 (2): 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2018. Militarization. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Wiley.
  29. Mann, M. 1987. The Roots and Contradictions of Modern Militarism. New Left Review 162 (2): 27–55.Google Scholar
  30. Naval History and Heritage Command. 2010. Women in the United States Navy. Accessed January 28, 2014.
  31. Pateman, C. 1998. The Patriarchal Welfare State. In Feminism, the Public and the Private, ed. Joan Landes, 241–276. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Petersen, A. 1998. Unmasking the Masculine – ‘Men’ and ‘Identity’ in a Sceptical Age. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Slater, J., and T. Nardin. 1973. The Concept of Military-Industrial Concept. In Testing the Theory of the Military-Industrial Complex, ed. Steven Rosen, 27–60. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  34. Snyder, W.P., and K.L. Nyberg. 1980. Gays and the Military: An Emerging Policy Issue. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 8: 71–84.Google Scholar
  35. Szitanyi, S. 2012. Aaron Belkin. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (4): 572–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tilly, C. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, 169–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. U.S. News Best Colleges. 2019a. United States Air Force Academy. Accessed March 25, 2019.
  38. ———. 2019b. United States Naval Academy. Accessed March 25, 2019.
  39. ———. 2019c. United States Military Academy. Accessed March 25, 2019.
  40. West, C., and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing Gender. Gender and Society 1 (2): 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Women in Military Service for America Memorial Foundation, Inc. 2014. Highlights in the History of Military Women. Women in Military Service for America Memorial Foundation. Accessed January 2, 2014.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schools of Public EngagementThe New SchoolNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations