Advertisement

External Approaches for Sinus Surgery

  • Senem Kurt Dizdar
  • Berna Uslu Coşkun
  • Slobodan Spremo
Chapter

Abstract

Sinus surgery by endoscopy is a surgical procedure that is safe and effective. Nowadays, procedures using external methods are rarely performed and are used only in specific circumstances. These procedures are considered if the complication is hard to reach by endoscopy or if the patient has undergone previous multiple failed procedures. In this chapter, we discuss the most commonly used external sinus approaches in the context of current endoscopic sinus surgery methods. Maxillary sinus access using endoscopy, including the most inferior, lateral, and anterior regions, requires special instruments, and success may not be possible in all cases. In those cases, external procedures can be useful. These external approaches can provide the sinus surgeon with the ability to surgically remove diseased tissue or neoplastic processes that cannot be reached even by extended approaches. The Caldwell–Luc procedure is the most common external approach that is used to access the maxillary sinus. The ethmoid sinus can be accessed via the nose, the maxillary sinus, or externally. Currently, the latter is rarely used in chronic rhinosinusitis patients, but can be used to access the medial orbit. When inflammation and edema limit endoscopic visualization, transcutaneous procedures are used to increase the exposure to the ethmoid, and the patient can be treated by external ethmoidectomy. In frontal sinus procedures, numerous past open methods have been described for treatment, including selective tumors, trauma cases, and sinusitis. Riedel, Kilian, Lothroph and Lynch’s procedures have been previously described the accessibility of frontal recess and sinus with the addition external ethmoidectomy to frontal sinusotomy. The osteoplastic frontal sinus flap in the presence or absence of obliteration and trephination have been described for access to the frontal sinus directly. Transseptal and transethmoid approaches to the sphenoid may be performed with a headlamp or a microscope but are now usually carried out using endoscopic guidance. The chapter is organized according to the anatomic sites and descriptions of the techniques, indications, contraindications, and complications are discussed.

Keywords

External approaches Sinus surgery Caldwell Luc procedure External ethmoidectomy Osteoplastic frontal sinus flap 

References

  1. 1.
    Schneider JS, Day A, Clavenna M, Russell PT 3rd, Duncavage J. Early practice: external sinus surgery and procedures and complications. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48(5):839–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang YC, Chen WH. Caldwell-Luc operation without inferior meatal antrostomy: a retrospective study of 50 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(9):2080–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barzilai G, Greenberg E, Uri N. Indications for the Caldwell-Luc approach in the endoscopic era. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(2):219–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeFreitas J, Lucente FE. The Caldwell-Luc procedure: institutional review of 670 cases: 1975–1985. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:1297–300.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim E, Duncavage J. Caldwell-Luc procedure. Oper Tech Otolaryngol. 2010;21:163–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lal D, Stankiewicz JA. Cummings otolaryngology head and neck surgery. In: Flint PW, editor. Primary sinus surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Penttila MA, Rautiainen ME, Pukander JS, et al. Endoscopic versus Caldwell-Luc approach in chronic maxillary sinusitis: comparison of symptoms at one-year follow-up. Rhinology. 1994;32:161–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Unlu HH, Caylan R, Nalca Y, et al. An endoscopic and tomographic evaluation of patients with sinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery and Caldwell-Luc operation: a comparative study. J Otolaryngol. 1994;23:197–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eibling DE. Chapter 8: Anterior antrostomy: the Caldwell-Luc operation. In: Myers EN, editor. Operative otolaryngology: head and neck surgery. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997. p. 57–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matheny KE, Duncavage JA. Contemporary indications for the Caldwell-Luc procedure. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11(1):23–6. Review.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Belasy FA. Inferior meatal antrostomy: is it necessary after radical sinus surgery through the Caldwell-Luc approach? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Low WK. Complications of the Caldwell-Luc operation and how to avoid them. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65:582–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson S, Wormald PJ. Patterns of innervation of the anterior maxilla: a cadaver study with relevance to canine fossa puncture of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(10):1785–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singhal D, Douglas R, Robinson S, et al. The incidence of complications using new landmarks and a modified technique of canine fossa puncture. Am J Rhinol. 2007;21:316–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramakrishnan VR, Suh JD, Chiu AG, Palmer JN. Addition of a minimally invasive medial orbital approach in the endoscopic management of advanced sino-orbital disease: cadaver study with clinical correlations. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(2):437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shorr N, Baylis HI, Goldberg RA, Perry JD. Transcaruncular approach to the medial orbit and orbital apex. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(8):1459–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Balch K, Goldberg R, Green J, et al. The transcaruncular approach to the medial orbit and ethmoid sinus. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1998;6:71–7.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neal GD. External ethmoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1985;18:55–60.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber R, Draf W, Kratzsch B, Hosemann W, Schaefer SD. Modern concepts of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(1):137–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hahn S, Palmer JN, Purkey MT, Kennedy DW, Chiu AG. Indications for external frontal sinus procedures for inflammatory sinus disease. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(3):342–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maeso PA, Deal RT, Kountakis SE. Combined endoscopic and minitrephination techniques in the surgical management of frontal sinus type IV cell disease. Am J Otolaryngol. 2009;30(5):337–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jone NS. Cummings otolaryngology head and neck surgery. In: Flint PW, editor. Management of the frontal sinuses. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kountakis SE, Draf WE, Senior BA. The frontal sinus. Berlin: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aghavan U, Jones NS. The place of Riedel’s procedure in contemporary sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118(9):700–5.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neel HB, McDonald TJ, Facer GW. Modified Lynch procedure for chronic frontal sinus diseases: rationale, technique, and long-term results. Laryngoscope. 1987;97(11):1274–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baron SH, Dedo HH, Henry CR. The mucoperiosteal flap in frontal sinus surgery. (The Sewall-Boyden-McNaught operation). Laryngoscope. 1973;83(8):1266–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gallagher RM, Gross CW. The role of mini-trephination in the management of frontal sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1999;13:289–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jacobs JB. 100 years of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(11 Pt 2):1–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoffmann DF, May M. Endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: frontal trephine permits a two-sided approach. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;2:257–61.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoffman R. Osteoplastic operations on the frontal sinuses for chronic suppuration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1904;13:598–608.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Patel AB, Cain RB, Lal D. Contemporary applications of frontal sinus trephination: a systematic review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(9):2046–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Murr AH. Contemporary indications for external approaches to the paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2004;37:423–34.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fishero BA, Chen PG, Payne SC. Modified glabellar rhytid incision for frontal sinus trephination. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2676–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee AS, Schaitkin BM, Gillman GS. Evaluating the safety of frontal sinus trephination. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(3):639–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bartley J, Eagleton N, Rosser P, Al-Ali S. Superior oblique muscle palsy after frontal sinus mini-trephine. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:181–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schneider JS, Archilla A, Duncavage JA. Five ‘nontraditional’ techniques for use in patients with recalcitrant sinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;21(1):39–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ochsner MC, DelGaudio JM. The place of the osteoplastic flap in the endoscopic era: indications and pitfalls. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(4):801–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee JM, Palmer JN. Indications for the osteoplastic flap in the endoscopic era. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19(1):11–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Correa AJ, Duncavage JA, Fortune DS, Reinisch L. Osteoplastic flap for obliteration of the frontal sinus: five years’ experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:731–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kanowitz SJ, Batra PS, Citardi MJ. Comprehensive management of failed frontal sinus obliteration. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22:263–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seiberling K, Floreani S, Robinson S, Wormald PJ. Endoscopic management of frontal sinus osteomas revisited. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23:331–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Anand VK, Hiltzik DH, Kacker A, Honrado C. Osteoplastic flap for frontal sinus obliteration in the era of image guided endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2005;19:406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al-Qudah M, Graham SM. Modified osteoplastic flap approach for frontal sinus disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(3):192–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Healy DY Jr, Leopold DA, Gray ST, Holbrook EH. The perforation technique: a modification to the frontal sinus osteoplastic flap. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(6):1314–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Isa AY, Mennie J, McGarry GW. The frontal osteoplastic flap: does it still have a place in rhinological surgery? J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(2):162–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Donald PJ. The tenacity of frontal sinus mucosa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1979;87(5):557–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hardy JM, Montgomery WW. Osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy: an analysis of 250 operations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976;85:523–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Weber R, Draf W, Keerl R, Kahle G, Schinzel S, Thomann S, et al. Osteoplastic frontal sinus surgery with fat obliteration: technique and long-term results using magnetic resonance imaging in 82 operations. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1037–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Javer AR, Alandejani T. Prevention and management of complications in frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2010;43(4):827–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Senem Kurt Dizdar
    • 1
  • Berna Uslu Coşkun
    • 1
  • Slobodan Spremo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity of Health Sciences, Şişli Etfal Training and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department for OtorhinolaryngologyUniversity Clinic Center of Republic SrpskaBanja LukaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations