Advertisement

Experiencing Transformation

  • Mathias Guenther
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with the impact, mentally and affectively, of the experience of transformation of a human into an animal. It considers that impact from two perspectives, one virtual and vicarious, through myth via the imagination, and the other real and direct, through the body. The former focuses on mythological protagonists whose reactions and emotions to an ontological transformation they are undergoing—such as a young woman and mother of an infant she nurses into a caracal or of a young man, playing a tune on his musical bow, transforming into a tree—are mediated by a storyteller. The latter considers a shaman’s lion transformation, either directly, through the body and senses, by the shaman, or, more accessible ethnographically, through first- or second-hand witnesses’ accounts. The latter includes an account by the author (expanded on in one of the appendices) of a leonine transformation he observed when conducting ethnographic fieldwork in the 1970s.

References

  1. Bleek, Dorothea. 1934/53. “!kun Mythology.” Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, XXV (4): 261–283.Google Scholar
  2. Bleek, Wilhelm H.I., and Lucy Lloyd. 1911. Specimens of Bushman Folklore. London: George Allen & Co, Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Brill, Lesley. 2006. Crowds, Power, and Transformation in Cinema. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burling, Robbins. 1964. Cognition and Componential Analysis: God’s Truth or Hocus-Pocus? American Anthropologist 66: 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canetti, Elias. 1984 [1960]. Crowds and Power. Trans. Carol Stewart. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2002 [1960]. Vorgefühl und Verwandlung unter den Buschmännern. In Der Mond als Schuh: Zeichnungen der San/The Moon as Shoe: Drawings of the San, ed. Miklós Szalay, 101–12. Zurich: Scheidegger & Spiess.Google Scholar
  7. Costa, L., and C. Fausto. 2010. The Return of the Animists: Recent Studies of Amazonian Ontologies. Religion and Society: Advances in Research 1: 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deacon, Janette, and Craig Foster. 2005. My Heart Stands in the Hill. Cape Town: Struik Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Culture and Nature. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Donald, Merlin. 2001. A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Duerr, Hans Peter. 1985. Traumzeit. Über die Grenze zwischen Wildnis und Zivilisation. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp. (English Translation by Felicitas Goodman, Dreamtime: Concerning the Boundary Between Wilderness and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar
  12. Dugatkin, Lee Alan, and Matthew Hasenjager. 2015. The Networked Animal. Scientific American 312 (6): 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forth, Gregory. 2018. Elderly People Growing Tails: The Constitution of Nonempirical Ideas. Current Anthropology 59 (4): 397–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, Charles. 2016. Being a Beast: Adventures Across the Species Divide. New York: Metropolitan Books Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Guenther, Mathias. 1996. Attempting to Contextualize /Xam Oral Tradition. In Voices from the Past: /Xam Bushmen and the Bleek and Lloyd Collection, ed. Janette Deacon and Thomas A. Dowson, 77–99. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2005. The Professionalisation and Commoditisation of the Contemporary Bushman Trance Dancer and Trance Dance, and the Decline of Sharing. In Property and Equality, Volume 2: Encapsulation, Commercialisation, Discrimination, ed. Thomas Widlok and Wolde Gossa Tadesse, 208–230. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2006. ‘N//ae’ (‘Talking’): The Oral and Rhetorical Base of San Culture. Journal of Folklore Research 43: 241–261.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2014. Dreams and Stories. In Courage of //Kabbo: Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the Publication of Specimens of Bushman Folklore, ed. Janette Deacon and Pippa Skotnes, 195–210. Cape Town: UCT Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2015. ‘Therefore Their Parts Resemble Humans, for They Feel That They Are People’: Ontological Flux in San Myth, Cosmology and Belief. Hunter-Gatherer Research 1 (3): 277–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hewitt, Roger. 1986. Structure, Meaning and Ritual in the Narratives of the Southern San. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Ijäs, Mikko. 2017. Fragments of the Hunt: Persistence Hunting, Tracking and Prehistoric Art. Doctoral thesis, Aalto University: School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Department of Art.Google Scholar
  22. Katz, Richard, Megan Biesele, and Verna St. Denis. 1997. “Healing Makes Our Hearts Happy”: Spirituality and Cultural Transformation among the Kalahari Ju/’hoansi. Rochester: Inner Traditions.Google Scholar
  23. Keeney, Bradford. 1999. Kalahari Bushman Healers. Philadelphia: Ringing Rocks Press.Google Scholar
  24. Keeney, Bradford, and Hillary Keeney., eds. 2015. Way of the Bushman as Told by the Tribal Elders. Rochester: Bear & Company.Google Scholar
  25. Kinahan, John. 2010. The Rock Art of /Ui-//aes (Twyfelfontein) Namibia’s First World Heritage Site. Adoranten 2010: 39–51.Google Scholar
  26. Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Towards an Anthropology of Nature beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis-Williams, David J. 2000. Stories that Float From Afar: Ancestral Folklore of the San of Southern Africa. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2015. Myth and Meaning: San-Bushman Folklore in Global Context. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis-Williams, David J., and David G. Pearce. 2004. San Spirituality: Roots, Expression, and Social Consequences. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis-Williams, David J., and Thomas Dowson. 1989. Images of Power Understanding Bushman Rock Art. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Lyons, Andrew P. 2018. “Comment”, on Forth, Gregory Forth 2018. “Elderly People Growing Tails: The Constitution of Nonempirical Ideas”. Current Anthropology 59 (4): 407–408.Google Scholar
  32. Norris, Margot. 1980. Darwin, Nietzsche, Kafka, and the Problem of Mimesis. MLN 95 (5): 1232–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schapera, Isaac. 1930. The Khoisan Peoples of South Africa: Bushmen and Hottentots. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, Sigrid. 2013. South African /Xam Bushman Traditions and Their Relationship to Further Khoisan Folklore, Research in Khoisan Studies. Vol. 31. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Suzman, James. 2017. Affluence Without Abundance: The Disappearing World of the Bushmen. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Thurner, Ingrid. 1983. Die transzendenten und mythischen Wesen der San (Buschmänner) Eine religionsethnologische Analyse historischer Quellen. Wien: Föhrenau.Google Scholar
  38. Wiessner, Polly. 2014. Embers of Society: Firelight Talk Among the Ju/’hansi Bushmen. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) 111 (39): 14027–14035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. 2010. Bubbles and Webs: A Backdoor Stroll Through the Readings of Uexküll. In A Foray into the World of Animals and Humans, with a Theory of Meaning, ed. Jakob von Uexküll, 209–43. Trans. Joseph D. O’Neill. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wittenberg, Hermann. 2012. Wilhelm Bleek and the Khoisan Imagination: A Study of Censorship, Genocide and Colonial Science. Journal of Southern African Studies 38: 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, David E., and Jean-Guy Goulet, eds. 1998. Being Changed by Cross-Cultural Encounters: The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experience. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Guenther
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityOntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations