Advertisement

Error Reducing Strategies

  • Haris Chrysikopoulos
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses ways to block errors and biases, with the emphasis placed on the individual imaging professional, not on the system. I present a maze of checklists, questions, and filters to stop errors and biases “on their tracks.” This chapter is the most “dense” in terms of knowledge and information and displays a fresh way of thinking about errors and biases. Following the proposed algorithms is cumbersome and time consuming at first, but continuous practice leads to a safer navigation through the diagnostic dilemmas of everyday practice. So keep your eyes on the “prize”: improved outcomes for the patients, an overall decrease in the cost of health care, and a healthy sense of pride for us.

References

  1. 1.
    Robinson PJ. Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Roentgen image. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1085–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunderman RB, Nyce JM. The tyranny of accuracy in radiologic education. Radiology. 2002;222:297–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Itri JN, Tappouni RR, McEachern RO, Pesch RO, Patel SH. fundamentals of diagnostic error in imaging. Radiographics. 2018;38:1845–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schiff GD. Minimizing diagnostic error: the importance of follow-up and feedback. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 suppl):S38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brook OR, O’Connell AM, Thornton E, Eisenberg RL, Mendiratta-Lala M, Kruskal JB. Quality initiatives: anatomy and pathophysiology of errors occurring in clinical radiology practice. Radiographics. 2010;30:1401–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graber ML. Taking steps toward a safer future: measures to promote timely and accurate Medical diagnosis. Am J Med. 2008;121(suppl 5):S43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly AM. Basic definitions. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roddie ME. Approach to characterizing radiological errors. In: Peh WCG, editor. Pitfalls in diagnostic radiology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berlin L. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction. AJR. 2007;189:517–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berlin L. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Overdiagnosis, false-positive findings, and malpractice. AJR. 2014;203:W549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology. Perceptual errors. AJR. 1996;167:587–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berlin L, Hendrix RW. Perceptual errors and negligence. AJR. 1998;170:863–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berlin L. Errors of omission. AJR. 2005;185:1416–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D. Interpretive error in radiology. AJR. 2017;208:739–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bui-Mansfield LT. “Fool me twice”: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. Video Lecture. www.learning.arrs.org/course/view.php?id=518. Accessed 19 Nov 2017.
  16. 16.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Bansal NK. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41:1793–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kabadi SJ, Krishmaraj A. Strategies for improving the value of the radiology report: a retrospective analysis of errors in formally over-read studies. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:459–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35:1668–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berlin L. Radiologic errors, past, present and future. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014;1:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim YW, Mansfield LT. Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors. AJR. 2014;202:465–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCreadie G, Oliver TB. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donald JJ, Barnard SA. Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56:173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Renfrew DL, Franken EA Jr, Berbaum KS, Weigelt FH, Abu-Yousef MM. Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology. 1982;183:145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eberhardt SC, Heilbrun ME. Radiology report value equation. Radiographics. 2018;38:1888–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ware JB, Saurabh J, Hoang JK, Baker S, Wruble J. Effective radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:838–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newman-Toker D. A unified conceptual model for diagnostic errors: underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014;1:43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brady AP. Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging. 2017;8:171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brady A, Laoide RO, McCarthy P, McDermott R. Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J. 2012;81:3–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sabih DE, Sabih A, Sabih Q, Khan AN. Image perception and interpretation of abnormalities; can we believe our eyes? Can we do something about it? Insights Imaging. 2011;2:47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pinto A, Brunese L. Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology. World J Radiol. 2010;2:377–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fitzgerald R. Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1760–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fitzgerald R. Error in Radiology. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:938–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bruno MA. Our mistakes-the human experience. Video Lecture. www.learning.arrs.org/mod/url/view.php?id=400. Accessed 22 Nov 2016.
  34. 34.
    Bruno MA. 256 shades of gray: uncertainty and diagnostic error in radiology. Diagnosis (Berl). 2017;4:149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Garland LH. Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nuc Med. 1959;82:25–38.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Abujudeh HH, Boland GW, Kaewlai R, et al. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1952–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robinson PJ, Wilson D, Coral A, Murphy A, Verow P. Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:323–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Babiarsz LS, Yousem DM. Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:969–80.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wakeley CJ, Jones AM, Kabala JE, Prince D, Goddard PR. Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films. Br J Radiol. 1995;68:358–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pinto A, Scuderi MG, Daniele S. Errors in radiology: definition and classification. In: Romano L, Pinto A, editors. Errors in radiology. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bechtold RE, Chen MY, Ott DJ, Zagoria RJ, Scharling ES, Wolfman NT, Vining DJ. Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:681–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Owens EJ, Taylor NR, Howlett DC. Perceptual type error in everyday practice. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG 3rd, Doi K. Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology. 2002;225:673–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Del Ciello A, Franchi P, Contegiacomo A, Cicchetti G, Bonomo L, Larici AR. Missed lung cancer: when, where and why? Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23:118–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Palazzetti V, Guidi F, Ottaviani L, Valeri G, Baldassarre S, Giusepetti GM. Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinics. Radiol Med. 2016;121:828–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wu MZ, McInnes MD, Macdonald DB, Kielar AZ, Duigenan S. CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates. Radiology. 2014;270:717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Executive summary in: to err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000. p. 1–16.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001;322:517–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wachter RM. Why diagnostic errors don’t get any respect-and what can be done about them. Health Aff. 2010;29:1605–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Halsted MJ. Hearing the alarms: defining medical errors. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sanders L. Sick thinking. In: Every patient tells a story. New York: Broadway Books; 2010. p. 193–215.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Groopman J. Introduction. In: How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2008. p. 1–26.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii21–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Raskin MM. Survival strategies for radiology: some practical tips on how to reduce the risk of being sued and losing. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:689–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Croskerry P. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Edu. 2009;14:27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2013.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wallsten TS. Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Med Decis Making. 1981;1:145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Itri JN, Patel SH. Heuristics and cognitive error in medical imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:1097–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE. Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR. 2013;201:611–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic errors in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 Suppl):S2–S23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Croskerry P, Norman G. Overconfidence in clinical decision making. Am J Med. 2008;121(5 Suppl):S24–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Trowbridge RL. Twelve tips for teaching avoidance of diagnostic errors. Med Teach. 2008;30:496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S, et al. Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii58–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S, et al. Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii65–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Henriksen K, Brady J. The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rencic J. Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2011;33:887–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Delaney C, Golding C. Teaching clinical reasoning by making thinking visible: an action research project with allied health clinical educators. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:20–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Ilgen JS, Schmidt HG, Mamede S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421.
  70. 70.
    Trowbridge RL, Dhaliwal G, Cosby KS. Educational agenda for diagnostic error reduction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii28–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Graber ML, Kissam S, Payne VL, et al. Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:535–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lee CS, Kadom N, Nagy P. Reducing errors from cognitive biases through quality improvement projects. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14:852–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Singhal G. Perspectives from a pediatrician about diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berlin). 2014;1:69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Elstein AS, Schwarz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ. 2002;324:729–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287:226–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chrysikopoulos H. Basics of MR examinations and interpretation. In: Clinical MR imaging and physics: a tutorial. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 109–64.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cahan A. Diagnosis is driven by probabilistic reasoning: counter-point. Diagnosis (Berlin). 2016;3:99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rubin GD, Roos JE, Tall M, et al. Characterizing search, recognition and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking. Radiology. 2015;274:276–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Drew T, Vo MLH, Olwal A, Jacobson F, Seltzer SS. Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. J Vis. 2013;13:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Groopman J. The eye of the beholder. In: How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2007. p. 177–202.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Morgan B, Stephenson JA, Griffin Y. Minimising the impact of errors in the interpretation of CT images for surveillance and evaluation of therapy in cancer. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:1083–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Radisphere. Concurrence review. www.radisphereradiology.com/standards/diagnostic-accuracy/concurrence-review/. Accessed 24 Oct 2016.
  83. 83.
    Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, Yamamoto A, Ueda H, Takasu K. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. Radiographics. 2003;23:45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Walker C, Takasugi JE, Chung JA, et al. Tumorlike conditions of the pleura. Radiographics. 2012;32:971–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kim SW, Kim HC, Yang DM, Won KY. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with a thousand faces: atypical manifestations and causes of misdiagnosis on imaging. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:3130–42.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Shaaban AM, Revzani M, Tubay M, Elsayes KM, Woodward PJ, Menias CO. Fat-containing retroperitoneal lesions: imaging characteristics, localization, and differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2016;36:710–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Sandrasegaran K, Rajesh A, Rydberg J, Rushing DA, Akisik FM, Henley JD. Pictorial essay. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: clinical, radiologic and pathologic features. AJR. 2005;184:803–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Levy A, Arnaiz J, Shaw JC, Sobin LH. From the archives of AFIP. Primary peritoneal tumors: imaging features with pathologic correlation. Radiograhics. 2008;28:583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Lakhman Y, D’Anastasi M, Micco M, et al. Second-opinion interpretations of gynecologic oncologic MRI examinations by sub-specialized radiologists influence patient care. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:2089–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Asayama Y, Yosimitsu K, Aibe H, et al. MDCT of the gonadal veins in females with large pelvic masses: value in differentiating ovarian versus uterine origin. AJR. 2006;186:440–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wu YH, Song B, Xu J, et al. Retroperitoneal neoplasms within the perirenal space in infants and children: differentiation of renal and non-renal origin in enhanced images. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    George AE, Russell EJ, Kricheff II. White matter buckling: CT sign of extraaxial mass. AJR. 1980;135:1031–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Russel EJ, Naidich TP. The enhancing septal/alveal wedge: a septal sign of intraaxial mass. Neuroradiology. 1982;23:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Muranda P, Purohit BS, Thota V, Rashad A, Tan TY. Pictorial review of the imaging anatomy and common pathology of the parotid space. Poster ECR 2014/C-2384. 2014. https://posterng.netkey.at/esr/viewing/index.php?module=viewing_poster&doi=10.1594/ecr2014/C-1092. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  95. 95.
    Wasenko JJ, Hocchauser L, Stopa LG, Winfield JA. Cystic meningiomas: MR characteristics and surgical correlations. Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1959–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Bhatia V, Sharma S, Sood S, Mardi K, Venkat B. Diagnosis please: case 231: retroperitoneal adrenal teratoma presenting a trichoptysis. Radiology. 2016;280:317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Patsios D, Roberts HC, Paul NS, et al. Pictorial review of the many faces of bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:1015–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Abbott GF, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Frazier AA, Franks TJ, Pugattch RD, Galvin JR. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: radiologic- pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2005;25:803–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Avila NA, Dwyer AJ, Moss J. Imaging features of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: diagnostic pitfalls. AJR. 2011;196:982–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Taljanovic MS, Hoover K. System-based imaging pitfalls: musculoskeletal system. In: Peh WCG, editor. Pitfalls in diagnostic radiology. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 145–83.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Park JS, Ryu KN. Pictorial essay. Hemophilic pseudotumor involving the musculoskeletal system: spectrum of radiologic findings. AJR. 2004;183:55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Howard S, Jagganathan J, Krajewski K, et al. Multimodality imaging in amyloidosis. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12:109–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Georgiades CS, Neyman E, Barish MA, Fishman EK. Amyloidosis: review and CT manifestations. Radiographics. 2004;24:405–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Sedrak P, Ketonen L, Hou P, et al. Erdheim-Chester disease of the central nervous system: new manifestations of a rare disease. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:2126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Antunes C, Graca B, Donato P. Thoracic, abdominal and musculoskeletal involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: CT, MR and PET imaging findings. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:473–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Raman SP, Pipavath SNJ, Raghu G, Schmidt RA, Godwin JD. Imaging of thoracic lymphatic diseases. AJR. 2009;193:1504–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Yang DH, Goo HW. Generalized lymphangiomatosis: radiologic findings in three pediatric patients. Korean J Radiol. 2006;7:287–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Patnana M, Sevrukov AB, Elsayes KM, Viswanathan C, Lubner M, Menias CO. Inflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimicker. AJR. 2012;198:W217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Heo SH, Shin SS, Kim JW, et al. Imaging of actinomycosis in various organs: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. 2014;34:19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Morland D, Hassler S. Diagnosis please. Case 219: pelvic actinomycosis mimicking malignant tumor. Radiology. 2015;276:304–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Middlebrooks EH, Frost CJ, De Jesus RO, Massini TC, Schmafuss IM, Mancuso AA. Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis: a comprehensive update of CT findings and design of an effective diagnostic imaging model. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Given CA, Stevens BS, Lee C. The MRI appearance of tumefactive demyelinating lesions. AJR. 2004;182:195–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wu HT, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME. Edematous Scmorl’s nodes on thoracolumbar MR imaging: characteristic patterns and changes over time. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:212–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Hauger O, Cotten A, Chateil JF, Borg O, Moinard M, Diard F. Giant cystic Schmorl’s nodes. Imaging findings in six patients. AJR. 2001;176:969–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Crema MD, da Silva Herrero CFP, Pasqualini W, Defino HLA. The several faces of Schmorl’s node: pictorial essay. Coluna. 2015;14:320–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Rodacki MA, Castro CE, Castro DS. Diffuse vertebral body edema due to calcified intraspongious disk herniation. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sobocinska M, Sobocinski B, Jarmzemska A, Searfin B. Rounded atelectasis of the lung: a pictorial review. Pol J Radiol. 2014;79:203–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Vernuccio F, Borhani AA, Dioguardi Burgio M, Midiri M, Furlan A, Brancatelli G. Common and uncommon pitfalls in pancreatic imaging: it is not always cancer. Abdom Radiol. 2015;41:283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Dahan H, Arrive L, Wendum D, le Pointe D, Djouri H, Tubiana JM. Retrorectal developmental cysts in adults: clinical and radiologic-histopathologic review, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics. 2001;21:575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Yang DM, Jung DH, Kim H, et al. Retroperitoneal cystic masses: CT, clinical, and pathologic findings and literature review. Radiographics. 2004;24:1353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Yildiz AE, Ariyurek MO, Karcaaltincaba M. Splenic anomalies of shape, size, and location: pictorial essay. Sci World J. 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/321810. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.
  122. 122.
    Revzani M, Menias C, Sandrasegaran K, Olpin JD, Elsayes KM, Shaaban AM. Heterotopic pancreas: histopathologic features, imaging findings, and complications. Radiographics. 2017;37:484–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Donkol RH, Mogdazy KM, Abolenin A. Assessment of gray matter heterotopia by magnetic resonance imaging. World J Radiol. 2012;4:90–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Abdel Razek AA, Kandell AY, Elsorogy LG, Elmongy A, Basett AA. Disorders of cortical formation: MR imaging features. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Barkovich AJ, Guerrini R, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: update 2012. Brain. 2012;135:1348–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Hofman PAM, Fitt GJ, Harvey AS, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson G. Bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia: imaging features. AJR. 2011;196:881–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Colombo N, Tassi L, Galli C, et al. Focal cortical dysplasias: MR imaging, histopathology, and clinical correlations in surgically treated patients with epilepsy. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:724–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Fortman BJ, Kuszyk BS, Urban BA, Fishman EK. Neurofibromatosis type 1: a diagnostic mimicker at CT. Radiographics. 2001;21:601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Westland R, Schreuder MF, Ket JC, van Wijk JA. Unilateral renal agenesis: a systematic review on associated anomalies and renal injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:1844–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Hall-Craggs MA, Kirkham A, Creighton SM. Renal and urologic abnormalities occurring with Mullerian anomalies. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Ha CS, Medeiros LJ, Charnsangavej C, Crump M, Gospodarowitz MK. Plenary session-oncodiagnosis panel: 2004. Lymphoma Radiographics. 2006;26:607–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Burrill J, Williams CJ, Bain G, Conder G, Hine AL, Misra RR. Tuberculosis: a radiologic review. Radiographics. 2007;27:1255–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Koyama M, Ueda H, Togashi K, Umeoka S, Kataoka M, Nagai S. Radiologic manifestations of sarcoidosis in various organs. Radiographics. 2004;24:87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Bonekamp D, Horton KM, Hruban RH, Fishman EK. Castleman disease: the great mimic. Radiographics. 2011;31:1793–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Vilanova JC, Barcelo J, Smirniotopoulos JG, et al. Hemangioma from head to toe: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2004;24:367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Friedman DP. Symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: MR findings. AJR. 1996;167:359–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Chrysikopoulos H, Roussakis A, Tsakraklides V, Vassilouthis J. Sclerotic skeletal hemangiomatosis presenting with spinal cord compression-CT and MRI findings. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:965–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Chai JW, Hong SH, Choi JY, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of osteoid osteoma: from simple to challenging findings. Radiographics. 2010;30:737–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Klontzas ME, Zibis AH, Karantanas AH. Osteoid osteoma of the femoral neck: use of the half-moon sign in MRI diagnosis. AJR. 2015;205:353–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Kakitsubata Y. Imaging of Paget disease of bone and its musculoskeletal complications: review. AJR. 2011;196:S64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Smith SE, Murphey MD, Motamedi K, Mulligan ME, Resnick CS, Gannon FH. Radiologic spectrum of Paget disease of bone and its complications with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22:1191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Zwaan L, Singh H. The challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic error. Diagnosi. 2015;2:97–103.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Heyhoe J, Lawton R, Armitage G, Conner M, Ashurst NH. Understanding diagnostic error: looking beyond diagnostic accuracy. Diagnosi. 2015;2:205–9.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    De Cocker LJ, Lovblad KO, Hendrikse J. MRI of cerebellar infarction. Eur Neurol. 2017;77:137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Yannes M, Frabizzio JV, Shah QA. Reversal of CT hypodensity after acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2013;6:10–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Choi P, Srinkath V, Phan T. “Fogging” resulting in normal MRI 3 weeks after ischemic stroke. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr042011410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    O’Brien P, Sellar RJ, Wardlaw JM. Fogging on T2-weighted MR after acute ischemic stroke: how often might this occur and what are the implications? Neuroradiology. 2004;46:635–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Uchino A, Sawada YA, Imaizumi T, Mineta T, Kudo S. Report of fogging effect on fast FLAIR magnetic resonance images of cerebral infarctions. Neuroradiology. 2004;46:40–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Dekeyzer S, Reich A, Othman AE, Wiesmann M, Nikoubashman O. Infarct fogging on immediate postinterventional CT-a not infrequent occurrence. Neuroradiology. 2017;59:853–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Wu J, Goyal L, Nipp R, Wo J, Qadan M, Uppot RN. The tipping point: critical changes in the management of malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;48:61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Johnson PT, Badger D, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Mitigating misdiagnosis in radiology: educational CT CME case conference for peer review and interpretive improvement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:1244–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Johnson PT, Horton KM, Fishman EK. How not to miss or mischaracterize a renal cell carcinoma: protocols, pearls and pitfalls. AJR. 2010;194:W307–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Espinosa LA, Kelly AM, Hawley C, et al. Clinical utility of multiplanar reformation in pulmonary CT angiography. AJR. 2010;194:70–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Bae KT, Mody GN, Balfe DM, et al. CT depiction of pulmonary emboli: display window settings. Radiology. 2005;236:677–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Sahi K, Jackson S, Wiebe E, et al. The value of “liver windows” settings in the detection of small renal cell carcinomas on unenhanced computed tomography. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014;65:71–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Mitchell RM, Jewell P, Javaid MK, McKean D, Ostlere SJ. Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures? Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0363-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Obaid H, Husamaldin Z, Bhatt R. Underdiagnosis of vertebral collapse on routine multidetector computed tomography scan of the abdomen. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:795–800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Lenchick L, Rogers LF, Delmas PD, Gennant HK. Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: importance of recognition and description by radiologists. AJR. 2004;183:949–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Kawel N, Seifert B, Luetlof M, Boehm T. Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. AJR. 2009;192:1324–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Liu ZY, Sun JJ, He KW, Zhuo PY, Yu ZY. Primary or metastatic hepatic carcinoma? A breast cancer patient after adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy postoperatively with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:183–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Akanabe S, Ohira M, Kobayashi T, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma coinciding with a liver metastasis from a rectal carcinoma: case report. Surg Case Rep. 2016;2:94–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Nishino M, Hatabu H, Hodi FS. Imaging of cancer immunotherapy: current approaches and future directions. Radiology. 2019;290:9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Milliron B, Mittal PK, Canacho JC, Datir A, Moreno CC. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: imaging features before and after treatment. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017;46:17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Kwak JJ, Tirumani SH, Van den Abbele AD, Koo PJ, Jacene HA. Cancer immunotherapy: imaging assessment of novel treatment response patterns and immune related adverse events. Radiographics. 2015;35:424–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Wang LL, Leach JL, Breneman JC, McPherson CM, Gaskill-Shipley MF. Critical role of imaging in the neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic management of brain tumors. Radiographics. 2014;34:702–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Tirumani SH, Kim KW, Nishino M, et al. Update on the role of imaging of metastatic colorectal cancer. Radiographics. 2014;34:1908–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Shinagare AB, Jagannathan JP, Krajewsji KM, Ramaiya NH. Liver metastases in the era of molecular targeted therapy: new faces of treatment response. AJR. 2013;201:W15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Brufau BP, Cerqueda CS, Villalba LB, Izquierdo RS, Gonzalez BM, Molina CN. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: radiologic findings and assessment of response to targeted antiangiogenic therapy by using multidetector CT. Radiographics. 2013;33:1691–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Tirkes T, Hollar MA, Tann M, Kohli MD, Akisik F, Sandrasegaran K. Response criteria in oncologic imaging: review of traditional and new criteria. Radiographics. 2013;33:1323–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Clark T, Maximin S, Meier J, Pokharel S, Bhargava P. Hepatocellular carcinoma: review of epidemiology, screening, imaging diagnosis, response assessment, and treatment. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015;44:479–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Cruite I, Osan S, Dighe M. An update on criteria for assessing tumor response to treatment. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2013;42:209–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, et al. Liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with conventional and antiangiogenetic chemotherapy: evaluation with liver computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. JCAT. 2011;35:690–6.Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, et al. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinibmesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1753–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Nishino M, Hatabu H, Sholl LM, Ramaiya NH. Thoracic complications of precision cancer therapies: a practical guide for radiologists in the new era of cancer care. Radiographics. 2017;37:1371–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Viswanathan C, Truong MT, Sabegiel TL, et al. Abdominal and pelvic complications of nonoperative oncologic therapy. Radiographics. 2014;34:941–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Katabathina VS, Restrepo CS, Betancour Cuellar SL, Riascos RF, Menias CO. Imaging of oncologic emergencies: what every radiologist should know. Radiolographics. 2013;33:1533–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Abramson RG, Abramson VG, Chan E, et al. Complications of targeted drug therapies for solid malignancies: manifestations and mechanisms. AJR. 2013;200:475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Walker CM, Saldana DA, Gladish GW, et al. Cardiac complications of oncologic therapy. Radiographics. 2013;33:1801–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Ulaner GA, Lyall A. Identifying and distinguishing treatment effects and complications from malignancy at FDG PET/CT. Radiographics. 2013;33:1817–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Di Cesare E, Cerone G, Enrici RM, Tombolini V, Anselmo P, Masciocchi C. MRI characterization of residual mediastinal masses in Hodgkin’s disease: long term follow-up. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Gawande RS, Khurana A, Messig S, et al. Differentiation of normal thymus from anterior mediastinal lymphoma and lymphoma recurrence at pediatric PET/CT. Radiology. 2012;262:623–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Adike A, Karlin N, Menias C, Carey EJ. Pseudocirrhosis: a case series and literature review. Case Rep Gastroenetrol. 2016;10:381–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Lee SL, Chang ED, Na SJ, et al. Pseudocirrhosis of breast cancer metastases to the liver treated by chemotherapy. Cancer Res Treat. 2014;46:98–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Evans KK, Birdwell RL, Wolfe JM. If you don’t find it often, you often don’t find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screening. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Reed WM, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Brennan PC. The effect of abnormality-prevalence expectation non expert observer performance and visual search. Radiology. 2011;258:938–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS, Van Wert MJ, Kenner NM, Place SS, Kibbi N. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007;136:623–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Venkatanarasimha N, Damodharan K, Gogna A, et al. Diagnosis and management of complications from percutaneous biliary tract interventions. Radiographics. 2017;37:665–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Desai KR, Pandhi ME, Seedial SM, et al. Retrievable IVC filters: comprehensive review of device-related complications and advanced retrieval techniques. Radiographics. 2017;37:1236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Sigakis CJG, Mathai SK, Suby-Long TD, et al. Radiographic review of current therapeutic and monitoring devices in the chest. Radiographics. 2018;38:1027–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Taljanovic M, Hunter TB, Miller MD, Sheppard JE. Gallery of medical devices. Part 1: orthopedic devices for the extremities and pelvis. Radiographics. 2005;25:859–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Hunter TB, Yoshino MT, Dzioba R, Light RA, Berger WG. Medical devices of the head, neck, and spine. Radiographics. 2004;24:257–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimaraes LS. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographics. 2009;29:423–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Nouh MR, Nasr AMS, El-Shebeny MO. Wooden splinter-induced extremity injuries: accuracy of MRI evaluation. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2013;44:573–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Onofrio A, Toye LR. MRI web clinic: foreign body imaging with MRI. 2016. www.radsource.us/foreign-body-imaging-mri/. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.
  195. 195.
    Mathew RP, Thomas B, Basti RS, Suresh HB. Gossypibomas, a surgeon’s nightmare-patient demographics, risk factors, imaging and how we can prevent it. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Roldan CJ, Paniagua L. Central venous catheter intravascular malpositioning: causes, prevention, diagnosis, and correction. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16:658–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, et al. Migration of plastic biliary stents and endoscopic retrieval: an experience of three referral centers. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:217–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Saravanan MN, Mathai V, Kapoor D, Singh B. Fractured metallic biliary stent causing obstruction and jejunal perforation. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6:234–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Hjorth MH, Mechlenburg I, Soballe K, Roemer L, Jacobsen SS, Stilling M. Higher prevalence of mixed or solid pseudotumors in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty compared with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Lum TE, Fairbanks RJ, Pennington EC, Zwemer FL. Profiles in patient safety: misplaced femoral line guidewire and multiple failures to detect the foreign body on chest radiography. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:658–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Jager G, Futterer JJ, Rutten M. Cognitive errors in radiology: “thinking fast and slow”. ECR 2014 poster C-0899. 2014. http://posterng.netkey.at/esr/viewing/index.php?module=viewing_poster&doi=10.1594/ecr2014/C-0899. Accessed 22 Feb 2019.
  202. 202.
    Busby LP, Courtier JL, Glastonbury CM. Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics. 2018;38:236–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Lee A, Lau K, Stuckey S. Case report. An endless line on the chest radiograph. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014204540.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Standards for the reporting and interpretation of imaging investigations. This document was last reviewed in 2014 by the Clinical Radiology Professional Support and Standards Board and the Clinical Radiology Faculty Board. Last update September 2015. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/standards-reporting-and-interpretation-imaging-investigations. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.
  205. 205.
    Kaewlai R, Jackson VP, Abujudeh HH. Peer review in radiology. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Itri JN, Krishnaraj A. Do we need a national incident reporting system for medical imaging? J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:329–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Errors in radiology. The Royal College of Radiologists. www.rcr.ac.uk/audit/errors-radiology. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.
  208. 208.
    Standards for learning from discrepancies meetings. London: Faculty of Clinical Radiology, The Royal College of Radiologists; 2014. https://www.rcr.ac.ul/publication/standards-learning-discrepancies-meetings. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.
  209. 209.
    Kaewlai R, Abujudeh H. Peer review in clinical radiology practice. AJR. 2012;199:W158–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Mahgerefteh S, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Blachar A, Sosna J. Quality initiatives. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. Radiographics. 2009;29:1221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Lee JK. Quality: a radiology imperative-interpretation accuracy and pertinence. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:162–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Harvey BH, Alkasab TK, Prabhakar AM, et al. Radiologist peer review by group consensus. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:656–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Soffa DJ, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, Bhargavan M. Disagreement in interpretation: a method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:212–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Ruutiainen AT, Scanlon MH, Itri JN. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:644–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    American College of Radiology Peer Review. www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/RADPEER. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.
  217. 217.
    Brooke OR, Romero J, Brook A, Kruskal JB, Yam CS, Levine D. The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collection. Radiology. 2015;274:221–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Harvey HB, Sotardi ST. Peer learning and preserving the physician’s right to learn. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:444–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Sharpe RE Jr, Huffman RI, Congdon RG, et al. Implementation of a peer learning program replacing score-based peer review in a multispecialty integrated practice. AJR. 2018;211:949–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Itri JN, Donithan A, Patel SH. Random versus nonrandom peer review: a case for more meaningful peer review. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1045–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Donnelly LF, Dorfman SR, Jones J, Bisset GS. Transition from peer review to peer learning: experience in a radiology department. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Donnelly LF, Larson DB, Heller RE III, Kruskal JB. Practical suggestions on how to move from peer review to peer learning. AJR. 2018;210:578–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
  224. 224.
  225. 225.
    European Society of Radiology (ESR). ESR communication guidelines for radiologists. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:143–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    White C. Doctors mistrust systems for reporting medical mistakes. BMJ. 2004;329:12–3.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Larson DB, Donnelly LF, Podberesky DJ, Merrow AC, Sharpe RE Jr, Kruskal JB. Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: answering the call of the Institute of Medicine Report on Diagnostic Error. Radiology. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016161254.
  228. 228.
    Butler GJ, Forghani R. The next level of radiology peer review: enterprise-wide education and improvement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:349–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Halsted MJ. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:984–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. 230.
    Griffith KS, Marx D. Just culture: a shared commitment. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. 231.
    Web M & M Cases and Commentaries. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Patient safety network. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/Webmm. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  232. 232.
    Shaw CM, Flanagan FL, Fenlon HM, McNicholas MM. Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening program experience. Radiology. 2009;250:354–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Sadigh G, Loehfelm T, Applegate KE, Tridandapani S. Evaluation of near-miss wrong-patient events in radiology reports. AJR. 2015;205:337–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    Muchantef K, Forman HP. Professional resource cost of body CT examinations: analysis of interpretation costs in different patient populations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:652–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Seidelmann FE, Ward DC. Radiology Quality Institute White Paper. A new methodology for evaluating radiologist error rates: factoring in the complexity of study and potential for significant pathology. 2013. https://docplayer.net/18980530-A-new-methodology-for-evaluating-radiologist-error-rates-factoring-in-the-complexity-of-study-and-potential-for-significant-pathology.html. Accessed Apr 2019.
  236. 236.
    Lauritzen PM, Stavem K, Andersen JG, et al. Double reading of current chest CT examinations: clinical importance of changes to radiology reports. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Lauritzen PM, Andersen JG, Stokke MV, et al. Radiologist-initiated double reading of abdominal CT: retrospective analysis of the clinical importance of changes to radiology reports. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  238. 238.
    Duijim LE, Groenewoud JH, Hendicks JH, de Koenig HJ. Independent double reading of screening mammograms in the Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreement. Radiology. 2004;231:654–570.Google Scholar
  239. 239.
    Ciatto S, Ambrogetti D, Bonardi R, et al. Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates: results in the Florence screening program. J Med Screen. 2005;12:103–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Liston JC, Dall BJ. Can the NHS breast screening programme afford not to double read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol. 2003;58:474–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Lian K, Bharatha A, Aviv RI, Symons SP. Interpretation errors in CT angiography of the head and neck and the benefit of double reading. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:2132–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. 242.
    Wolf M, Krause J, Carney PA, Bogart A, Kurvers RHJM. Collective intelligence meets medical decision-making: the collective outperforms the best radiologist. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Yates T. The antidote for radiology errors. Imag Technol News. 2012. http://www.itnonline.com/article/antidote-radiology-errors. Accessed 18 Jan 2018.
  244. 244.
    Kahlben CL, Yetter EM, Olson MC, Posniak HV, Aranha GV. Assessing the resectability of pancreatic carcinoma: the value of re-interpreting abdominal CT performed at other institutions. AJR. 1998;171:1571–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    La L, Sonners AI, Schulman BJ, et al. Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1622–6.Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    Tilleman EHBM, Phoa SSKS, van Delden OM, et al. Reinterpretation of radiological imaging in patients referred to a tertiary referral centre with a suspected pancreatic or hepatobiliary malignancy: impact on treatment strategy. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1095–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  247. 247.
    Shetty AS, Mittal A, Salter A, Narra VR, Fowler KJ. Hepatopancreaticobiliary imaging second-opinion consultations: is there value in the second reading? AJR. 2018;211:1264–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. 248.
    Chang Sen LQ, Mayo RC, Lesslie MD, Yang WT, Leung JWT. Impact of second-opinion interpretation of breast imaging studies in patients not currently diagnosed with breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:980–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    Garcia D, Spruill LS, Irshad A, Wood J, Kepecs D, Klauber-DeMore N. The value of a second opinion for breast cancer patients referred to a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer center with a multidisciplinary breast tumor board. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2953–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  250. 250.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Duszak R Jr, Babb JS, Glover MK, Kang SK. Discrepancy rates and clinical impact of imaging secondary interpretations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1222–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. 251.
    Bosmans JM, Peremans L, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM. How do referring clinicians want the radiologists to report? Suggestions from the COVER survey. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:577–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  252. 252.
    Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Asfaw BA, Thrall JH. Quality initiatives: key performance indicators for measuring and improving Radiology Department performance. Radiographics. 2010;30:571–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  253. 253.
    Paushter DM, Baron RL. Practical quality assurance. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. 254.
    Kaewlai R, Abujudeh HH. Root cause analysis (RCA) and health care failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA). In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 38–51.Google Scholar
  255. 255.
    Sardanelli F. Evidence-based radiology and its relationship to quality. In: Abujudeh HH, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 255–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. 256.
    Bruno MA, Flemming DJ. Teaching quality and safety to radiology residents and fellows. In: Abujudeh H, Bruno MA, editors. Quality and safety in radiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 241–4.Google Scholar
  257. 257.
    Ludmerer KM. Learning to heal: the development of American Medical Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  258. 258.
    Ludmerer KM. Let me heal: the opportunity to preserve excellence in American Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  259. 259.
    Broder JC, Cameron SF, Korn WT, Baccei SJ. Creating a radiology quality and safety program: principles and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2018;38:1786–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. 260.
    Sarkany DS, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Catanzano TM, Fineberg TA, Eisenberg RL, Slanetz PJ. Running a radiology residency program: strategies for success. Radiographics. 2018;38:1729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. 261.
    Gunderman R, Chan S. Knowledge sharing in radiology. Radiology. 2003;229:314–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. 262.
    Graber M. Introduction to diagnostic error. The Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine. Diagnostic error resources. Video presentation. www.improvediagnosis.org/page/Education. Accessed 24 Oct 2016.
  263. 263.
    Penn curriculum in cognitive bias and diagnostic error for medical residents. In Society to improve diagnosis in medicine. Clinical reasoning toolkit: education. www.improvediagnosis.org/?ClinicalEducation. Accessed 6 Dec 2016.
  264. 264.
    Croskerry P. Dalhousie University critical thinking curriculum. In Society to improve diagnosis in medicine. Clinical reasoning toolkit: education. www.improvediagnosis.org/?ClinicalEducation. Accessed 6 Dec 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haris Chrysikopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.CT & MR DivisionEurodiagnosis Imaging CenterCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations