Advertisement

Virtue Ethics and CSR: The Two Sides of Sustainable Organizational Performance

  • Mihaela ConstantinescuEmail author
  • Muel Kaptein
Chapter

Abstract

The book chapter explores business ethics insights of a virtue ethics orientation to add a normative component to empirical research on CSR concerned with intrinsic and extrinsic drivers for organizational social performance. It argues that we need to adopt a broader perspective concerning the intrinsic motivations of business organizations to pursue goals that go beyond short-term, basic economic performance and strive for long-term, sustainable performance. This broader perspective can be achieved by taking into account the overall organizational internal context that stimulates both managers and employees to engage in ethical behaviour. The chapter thus appeals to the organizational virtues developed by the Corporate Ethical Virtues to assess whether an organization is intrinsically motivated to be socially responsible. To this end, it analyses how the virtues embedded by the organizational context foster organizational virtuousness, which is interpreted as an intrinsic driver for organizational ethical performance. This is further correlated with CSR reporting guidelines, interpreted as an extrinsic driver for organizational social performance. The chapter argues that organizations need to address both of them in order to reach a desirable level of long-term, sustainable performance, with the good news that both can be improved through ongoing practice.

References

  1. Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Brickson, S. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32, 864–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bright, D. S., Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2006). The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 954–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruhn, J. G. (2009). The functionality of gray area ethics in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium, corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia, a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Child, J., & Tsai, T. (2005). The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Constantinescu, M., & Kaptein, M. (2015a). CSR standards and corporate ethical virtues: A normative inquiry into the way corporations integrate stakeholder expectations. In S. Idowu, C. Frederiksen, A. Mermod, & M. Nielsen (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and governance: CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance (pp. 159–180). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Constantinescu, M., & Kaptein, M. (2015b). Mutually enhancing responsibility: A theoretical exploration of the interaction mechanisms between individual and corporate moral responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawford, N. (2007). Individual and collective moral responsibility for systematic military atrocity. Journal of Political Philosophy, 15, 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, K., & Frederick, W. C. (1984). Business and society: Management, public policy, ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Del Baldo, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: The experience of some “spirited businesses”. Journal of Management and Governance, 16, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellen, S. P., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrell, O. C., Thorne LeClair, D., & Ferrell, L. (1998). The federal sentencing guidelines for organizations: A framework for ethical compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, 23, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). Is the perception of “goodness” good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graafland, J. J., & Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten, C. (2012). Motives for corporate social responsibility. De Economist, 160, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Kaptein, M., & Van Oosterhout, J. (2006). The ethics of the node versus the ethics of the dyad? Reconciling virtue ethics and contractualism. Organization Studies, 27, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Kaptein, M., & Van Oosterhout, J. (2008). Contracts to communities: A processual model of organizational virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 100–121.Google Scholar
  23. Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). Explaining shades of green: Why do companies act differently on similar social issues? Law and Social Inquiry, 30, 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Husted, B., & Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, T., & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaptein, M. (1998). Ethics management: Auditing and developing the ethical content of organizations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 923–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior by unravelling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64, 843–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaptein, M. (2017). When organizations are too good: Applying Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean to the corporate ethical virtues model. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26, 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (2002). The balanced company: A theory of corporate integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katz, J., Swanson, P., & Nelson, L. (2001). Culture-based expectations of corporate citizenship: A propositional framework and comparison of four cultures. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ketola, T. (2008). A holistic corporate responsibility model: Integrating values, discourses and actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kolk, A. (2005). Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or divergence? Management International Review, 1, 145–166.Google Scholar
  34. Lindenberg, S. (2001). Intrinsic motivation in a new light. Kyklos, 54, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Looser, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2015). Doing well or doing good? Extrinsic and intrinsic CSR in Switzerland. Umwelt Wirtschadt Forum, 23, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Dasborough, M. T. (2011). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morse, J. (1999). The missing link between virtue theory and business ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shanahan, K. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2003). The development of a virtue ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sison, A. J. G., & Ferrero, I. (2015). How different is neo-Aristotelian virtue from positive organizational virtuousness? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24, 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Story, J., & Neves, P. (2015). When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: Exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swanson, D. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myth. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 69–81.Google Scholar
  45. Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. (2013). Feeling good by doing good: Employee CSR-induced attributions, job satisfaction, and the role of charismatic leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weaver, G., Treviño, L., & Cochran, P. (1999a). Corporate ethics programs as control systems, influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 41–57.Google Scholar
  48. Weaver, G., Treviño, L., & Cochran, P. (1999b). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance, management commitments, external pressures and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICUBUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.CCEA, Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations