Advertisement

Engaging the Community: Community-Based Participatory Research and Team Science

  • Nina WallersteinEmail author
  • Karen Calhoun
  • Milton Eder
  • Julie Kaplow
  • Consuelo Hopkins Wilkins
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the potential for incorporating community partner perspectives into contemporary team science by recounting contributions made by community–researcher partnerships characteristic of community-based participatory research (CBPR). These CBPR partnerships look similar to cross-disciplinary academic teams in their histories and imperatives to create shared leadership, mutual benefit, and multidirectional trust and respect. First, we define and then situate CBPR within the range of community-engaged research practices and discuss the opportunities as well as challenges for CBPR and community-engaged research (CEnR) to become established within Academic Health Science centers and clinical translational science award (CTSA) infrastructures. We will share summary results of CTSA surveys about community engagement, from the academic perspective and from community perspectives on barriers they continue to face. An in-depth example will be shared of a successful community–academic partnership that grew from a pilot study to a large-scale clinical and population intervention center. We will end with a CBPR conceptual model that showcases how cross-disciplinary teams are needed to describe the richness of contexts in which research take place, to frame the development and use of measures and metrics to evaluate partnerships, and to identify promising participatory practices associated with research and health outcomes. Recommendations are provided for engagement of community partners within the cross-disciplinary team science enterprise.

Keywords

Community-based participatory research Community engaged research Academic-community research collaborations Collaborative research 

References

  1. Abrams DB. Applying transdisciplinary research strategies to understanding and eliminating health disparities. Health Educ Behav. 2016;33(4):515–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borner K, Contractor N, Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Fiore S, Hall K, Keyton J, Spring B, Stokols D, Trochim W, Uzzi B. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Commentary Team Science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(49):49cm24.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Cacari-Stone L, Wallerstein N, Garcia A, Minkler M. The Promise of Community Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence with Policy, American Journal of Public Health 2014;104(9):1615–23.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper LA, Ortega AN, Ammerman AS, Buchwald D, Paskett ED, Powell LH, Thompson B, Tucker KL, Warnecke RB, McCarthy WJ, Viswanath KV, Henderson JA, Calhoun EA, Williams DR. Calling for a bold new vision of health disparities intervention research. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl 3):S374–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. CTSA U54, Clinical and Translational Science Award U54. 2016. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-15-304.html. Accessed 2 April 2016.
  6. Cyril S, Smith BJ, Possamai-Inesedy A, Renzaho AMN. Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:29842.  https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.29842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Dankwa-Mullan I, Rhee KB, Stoff DM, Pohlhaus JR, Sy FS, Stinson N, Ruffin J. Moving toward paradigm-shifting research in health disparities through translational, transformational, and transdisciplinary approaches. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. De Las Nueces D, Hacker K, DiGirolamo A, Hicks LS. A systematic review of community-based participatory research to enhance clinical trials in racial and ethnic minority groups. Health Serv Res., in Measuring and Analyzing Health Care Disparities. 2012;47:1363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01386.x.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Duran B, Oetzel J, Pearson C, Magarati M, Zhou C, Villegas M, Muhammad M, Belone L, Wallerstein N. Promising practices and outcomes: learnings from a CBPR cross-site national study, Prog Community Health Partnersh. in press.Google Scholar
  10. Eder M, Carter-Edwards L, Hurd T, Rumala B, Wallerstein N. A logic model for community engagement within the CTSA consortium: can we measure what we model? Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1430–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Eder M, Evans E, Funes M, Hong H, Reuter K, Ahmed S, Calhoun K, Corbie-Smith G, Dave G, DeFino M, Harwood E, Kissack A, Kleinman LC, Wallerstein N. Defining and measuring community engagement and community-engaged research: CTSA Institutional Practices. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):145–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Eder MM, Holzer J, Calhoun K, Strong LL. A retrospective on the vision for Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2017.0001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman ER, Seifer SD, Stupak M, Sprague Martinez LS. Community engagement in the CTSA program: stakeholder responses from a National Delphi Process. Clin Transl Sci. 2014;7(3):191–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Frerichs L, Hassmiller Lich K, Dave G, Corbie-Smith G. Integrating systems science and community-based participatory research to achieve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2015;106:215.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302944.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambescia SF, Woodhouse LD, Auld ME, Green BL, Quinn SC, Airhihenbuwa CO. Framing a transdisciplinary research agenda in health education to address health disparities and social inequities: a road map for SOPHE action. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(4):531–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham PW, et al. What is the role of culture, diversity, and community engagement in transdisciplinary translational science? Transl Behav Med. 2015;6:1–10.Google Scholar
  17. Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E, editors. Handbook of transdisciplinary science. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Hall KL, Feng AX, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S243–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmes J, Lehman A, Hade R, et al. Challenges for multilevel health disparities research in a transdisciplinary environment. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):S182–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award. 2016. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-06-002.html. Accessed 2 July 2016.
  21. IOM, (2013 Institute of Medicine). The CTSA program at NIH: opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Israel BA, Eng E, Schulz AJ, Parker EA. Methods in community based participatory research for health. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):311–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Jernigan V, Peercy M, Branam D, Saunkeah B, Wharton D, Winkleby M, Lowe J, Salvatore A, Dickerson D, Belcourt A, D’Amico E, Patten CA, Parker M, Duran B, Harris R, Buchwald D. Beyond health equity: achieving wellness within American Indian and Alaska native communities. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:S3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kagawa-Singer M, Dressler WW, George SM, Elwood WN. The cultural framework for health: an integrative approach for research and program design and evaluation. In: Office of Behavioral and Social Science. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Kaplow JB, Calhoun K, Porter Howard L, Follebout M. Implementing trauma- and grief-informed assessment in underserved communities: towards a best practice assessment model. School-community Health Alliance of Michigan Conference, Grand Rapids, MI. 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Kaplow JB, Layne CM, Oosterhoff B, Goldenthal H, Howell KH, Wamser-Nanney R, Burnside A, Calhoun K, Pynoos R, et al. Validation of the persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) checklist: a developmentally-informed assessment tool for bereaved youth. J Trauma Stress. 2018;31(2):244–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaplow JB, Layne CM, Pynoos RS, Cohen J, Lieberman A. DSM-V diagnostic criteria for bereavement-related disorders in children and adolescents: developmental considerations. Psychiatry. 2012;75(3):242–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplow JB, Rolon-Arroyo B, Layne CM, Rooney E, Oosterhoff B, Hill R, Steinberg A, Lotterman J, Gallagher K, & Pynoos RS. Validation of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (RI-5): A developmentally-informed assessment tool for trauma-exposed youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.019
  31. Kastelic S, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J. Socio-ecologic framework for CBPR: development and testing of a model. In: Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, Minkler M, editors. Community-based participatory research for health: advancing social and health equity. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2018. p. 77–94.Google Scholar
  32. Layne CM, Kaplow JB, Pynoos RS. Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (PCBD) Checklist – Youth Version 1.0. and Test Administration Manual. Los Angeles: University of California; 2014. http://oip.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/1-Pager_PCBD_Checklist.pdfGoogle Scholar
  33. Layne CM, Kaplow JB, Youngstrom E. Evidence-based assessment of childhood trauma and bereavement: concepts, principles, and practices. In: Cloitre M, Landolt M, Schnyder U, editors. Evidence-based treatments for trauma-related disorders in children and adolescents. New York: Springer Publications; 2018.Google Scholar
  34. Lucero J, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Alegria M, Greene-Moton E, Israel B, Kastelic S, Magarati M, Oetzel J, Pearson C, Schulz A, Villegas M, White Hat E. Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community based participatory research. J Mix Methods Res. 2018;12:55.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez L, et al. Community conceptualizations of health: implications for transdisciplinary team science. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;4(3):163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCloskey DJ, et al. Clinical and translational science awards community engagement key function committee task force on the principles of community engagement. In: Principles of community engagement, vol. 2011. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2013.Google Scholar
  37. Minkler M. Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl 1):S81–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Minkler M, Garcia A, Rubin V, Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research: a strategy for building healthy communities and promoting health through policy change. In: A report to the California endowment. Oakland, CA: PolicyLink; 2012.Google Scholar
  39. Muhammad M, Wallerstein N, Sussman A, Avila M, Belone L. Reflections on researcher identity and power: the impact of positionality on community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and outcomes. Crit Sociol. 2015;41:1045.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513516025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. NARCH Grants, Federal Register. A Notice by the Indian Health Service on 12/22/2008. 2008. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2008/12/22/E8-30300/native-american-research-centers-for-health-narch-grants#h-5. Accessed 28 Feb 2016.
  41. O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:129.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Oetzel J, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Sanchez-Youngman S, Nguyen T, Woo K, Wang J, Schulz AM, Kaholokula JK, Israel BA, Alegria M. Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the CBPR Conceptual Model: Pathways to Outcomes within Community-Academic Partnerships, Biomedical Research International, Article ID; 2018a, 7281405,  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7281405.
  43. Oetzel JG, Duran B, Sussman A, Magarati M, Khodyakov D, Wallerstein N. Evaluation of CBPR partnerships and outcomes: lessons and tools from the research for improved health study. In: Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, Minkler M, editors. Community-based participatory research for health: advancing social and health equity. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2018b. p. 237–50.Google Scholar
  44. Oetzel J, Villegas M, White Hat E, Duran B, Wallerstein N. Governance of community-engaged research: exploring the associations of final approval with processes and outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(6):1161–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Oetzel JG, Zhou C, Duran B, et al. Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community-based participatory research conceptual model. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):e188–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearson CR, Duran B, Magarati M, Oetzel J, Zhou C, Lucero J, Villegas M, Wallerstein N. Research for improved health: variability and impact of structural characteristics in federally-funded community engaged research studies. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015;9(1):17–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Rifkin S. Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: a review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29:ii98–ii106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Saltzman W, Layne CM, Pynoos RS, Olafson E, Kaplow JB, Boat B. Trauma and grief component therapy for adolescents: a modular approach to treating traumatized and bereaved youth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.Google Scholar
  49. Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, Avila M, Belone L, Mau M, Pearson C, Tafoya G, Duran B, Rios LI, Wallerstein N. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(4):680–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharma AE, Grumbach K. Engaging patients in primary care practice transformation: theory, evidence and practice. Fam Pract. 2017;34(3):262–7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Skinner JS, Williams NA, Richmond A, Brown J, Strelnick AH, Calhoun K, De Loney EH, Allen S, Pirie A, Wilkins CH. Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(3):263–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Stokols D. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. Am J Community Psychol. 2006;38:63–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prevent Med. 2008;35(2 Suppl):S77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trickett EJ. Community-based participatory research as worldview or instrumental strategy: is it lost in translation(al) research? Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1353–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S40–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, Minkler M. Community-based participatory research for health: advancing social and health equity. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2018.Google Scholar
  57. Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Duran B,Magarati M, Pearson C, Belone L, Davis J, Dewindt L, Lucero J, Ruddock C, Sutter E, Villegas M, Dutta, M. Culture-Centeredness in Community Based Participatory Research: Its Impact on Health Intervention Research, Health Education Research, 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyz021.
  58. Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Duran B, Tafoya G, Belone L, Rae R. What predicts outcomes in CBPR? In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community based participatory research for health: process to outcomes. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2008. p. 371–92.Google Scholar
  59. Wallerstein N, Yen I, Syme L. Integrating social epidemiology and community-engaged interventions to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(5):822–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilkins CH, Spofford M, Williams N, Mckeever C, Allen S, Brown J, et al.’ Community representatives’ involvement in clinical and translational science awardee activities. Clin Transl Sci. 2013;6(4):292–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Zerhouni EA, Alving B. Clinical and translational science awards: a framework for a national research agenda. Trans Res. 2006;148(1):4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Wallerstein
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Karen Calhoun
    • 3
  • Milton Eder
    • 4
    • 5
  • Julie Kaplow
    • 6
  • Consuelo Hopkins Wilkins
    • 7
  1. 1.College of Population HealthUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Center for Participatory Research, Health Sciences CenterUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  3. 3.Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  5. 5.Office of Community Engagement to Advance Research and Community Health, Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  6. 6.The Trauma and Grief Center, Texas Children’s HospitalBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  7. 7.Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations