Advertisement

Percutaneous Iliac and S2AI Fixation

  • Lauren Matteini
Chapter

Abstract

Pelvic instrumentation in spine surgery provides crucial fixation to the distal end of a long-construct fusion or added support to comminuted sacral fractures or pelvic ring injuries. Studies have shown increased rates of pseudoarthrosis when fixation is terminated at S1 in deformity cases. There are several techniques with which the pelvis can be instrumented. The most common is the iliac bolt, but S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw has gained popularity due to in-line connection to the cephalad construct and lower profile. Both can be placed safely via a percutaneous technique.

Keywords

Ilium Sacroiliac S2AI Fixation Deformity Iliac bolt S2 alar iliac Lumbopelvic 

References

  1. 1.
    Tsuchiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Baldus C. Minimum 5-year analysis of L5–S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity. Spine. 2006;31(3):303–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Brien JR, Yu WD, Bhatnagar R, Sponseller P, Kebaish KM. An anatomic study of the S2 iliac technique for lumbopelvic screw placement. Spine. 2009;34(12):E439–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Berra A, Lenke LG. Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum. A matched cohort analysis. Spine. 2004;29(18):1996–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Jung Kim Y, Berra AB, et al. Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis to L5 in adults: the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine. 2003;28(18):2122–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho KJ, Edwards CC 2nd, Rinella AS. Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):721–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cunningham BW, Lewis SJ, Long J, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbosacral reconstruction techniques for spondylolisthesis: an in vitro porcine model. Spine. 2002;27:2321–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lebwohl NH, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev A, et al. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model. Spine. 2002;27:2312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y, et al. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine. 1992;17(suppl 8):S235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Brien JR, Yu WD, Kaufman BE, Bucklen B, Salloum K, Khalil S, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared to iliac fixation. Spine. 2013;38(20):E1250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nottmeier EW, Pirris SM, Balseiro S, Fenton D. Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation. Spine. 2010;10(7):595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schildhauer TA, McCulloch P, Chapman JR, Mann FA. Anatomic and radiographic considerations for placement of transiliac screws in lumbopelvic fixations. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15(3):199–205; discussion 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O’Brien JR, Matteini L, Yu WD, Kebaish KM. Feasibility of minimally invasive sacropelvic fixation: percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation. Spine. 2010;35(4):460–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Matteini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and RehabilitationLoyola University ChicagoMaywoodUSA

Personalised recommendations