Advertisement

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

  • Jeffrey H. Weinreb
Chapter

Abstract

Lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) is a method to treat degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine in skeletally mature patients without high-grade spondylolisthesis who have failed conservative treatment. Although decompression and fusion for degenerative disc disease is considered the gold standard, potential drawbacks of arthrodesis include pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. The purpose of TDR is to restore and maintain motion segment mobility which is intended to prevent adjacent segment disease and relieve pain. This chapter discusses the background, indications/contraindications, technique including preparation and positioning, approach, and implant placement, along with postoperative care, and outcomes.

Keywords

Lumbar total disc replacement Degenerative disc disease Adjacent segment disease Low back pain 

References

  1. 1.
    Lumbar total disk arthroplasty Michael F. Duffy and Jack E. Zigler operative techniques: Spine Surgery, PRO. 42:371–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lumbar total disc arthroplasty Richard D. Guyer and Ernesto Otero-Lopez Benzel’s spine surgery, 184:1591–6.e1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van den Eerenbeemt, Karin D, et al. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(8):1262–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine David T. Anderson and Adam L. Shimer. Arthritis and Arthroplasty: The Spine, Chapter 47:357–64.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, et al. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine. 2006;31:S152–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, et al. A comparison of two retroperitoneal surgical approaches for total disc arthroplasty of the lumbar spine. Spine. 2008;33:205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec J-C. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine. 2003;28(10):1023–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Failed Total Disc Arthroplasty Andrew K. Simpson and Jack E. Zigler Rothman-Simeone and Herkowitz’s The Spine, Chapter 104:1889–901.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali e-H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:353–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine. 2007;32:661–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siepe CJ, Heider F, Wiechert K, et al. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Spine J. 2014;14:1417–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2005;30:2230–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J. 2009;9:374–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Regan JJ, McAfee PC, Blumenthal SL, et al. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charite Artificial Disc. Spine. 2006;31:2270–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey H. Weinreb
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryThe George Washington University HospitalWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations